Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

mario_sunny

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mario_sunny

  1. 100! Why that's nothing! Let's go for 500! :shock:
  2. I'm sorry baal, this one was just so much funnier. :P
  3. I've just checked several rares from zybez' pricecheck. They'll all acurate(give or a take a few hundred k) However, I can agree with your point that zybez does control a good part of the market.
  4. Awesome! I'll definately be there! :)
  5. Two words: GE paranoia. :P
  6. Look at it this way: - The alliance will not necessarly attack us, RSC is their main target. - If the alliance does run into RSC, since they have less opts than expected(because tip.it and RC declined), both sides will be severely weakened, or one totally destroyed. - If they are weakened, tip.it will slaughter them like chickens. RC shouldn't be a problem as it is a mediumish fansite with no big clans. - Runecrypt, even though medium-sized, will not necessarly attack tip.it, they may even have their primary focus on the alliance.
  7. ^ Ah, I'm glad it came to that. I personally supported declining it. I also noticed that RuneCrypt declined also, so at least if the alliance turns on us RuneCrypt won't necessarly be fighting us. I'll be scanning RSC to see what they have to say about our decline, I noticed some have already mentioned RC's decline. Also, I like to take this time to encourage everyone to recruit as many people as possible. We want to blow away all the other fan sites with hundreds of green capes! :P
  8. Colors: Dark colors; black, grey, red, ect. Images?: Two swords instead of the beer glasses(see below image) Text: TCE Events Team Notes (anything you want to add): Specifically need this 35x80, exactly like the sample image below. Use this image as a base to work it off: Thank you :)
  9. I don't mean to advertise my suggestion here; but I really think it is essential to this dicussion. Here is the topic, if you would take just a small glance at it.
  10. I found an interesting quote while scanning through the RSOF's Duel Arena rants sticky. With no personal comment, here is the quote, with player names censored out: The Duel Arena Update Quick find code: 27-28-630-54011496 : page 378
  11. Thanks for the picture, I wish I could have been there. :)
  12. The picture is fake. :P Thanks for the great laugh though, it made my day! :) If you go to page 424 of the Duel Arena sticky in the RSOF you'll find in between the 7th and 8th post(which are 20:19:42 and 20:20:14). In the picture, Paul's post was at 20:20:03, which would place it inbetween those two posts. There is no Jmod postsbetween them, additionally there is no 'Dan0952'(the fellow who posted above Paul in the picture) on the real page. :P
  13. 2x wouldn't be possible; the staking relies on a 10% price range.
  14. Just to let you all know, RSC is aware of our actions. Quote from the RSC MSSW3 topic:
  15. So... my point was do whichever you want. None of us disagreed with allowing this, so it's pretty much up to the leader(s) of the Tip.It team as to whether this will happen or not. He's not prohibited from doing whichever he chooses: going along with this or not. I think we have decided that was Dbz. Whatever his opinion, I know he will consider both side's arguments and choose well. I am in favor of not signing it, I agree with Stormrage's post earlier.
  16. I've been reading over many rants, as well as many suggestions lately. Piling all these together, I think I may have come up with a solution to the duel arena update, which has displeased many players. This solution will hopefully please both parties; jagex and the players. Here is the suggestion; when two players enter a 1 vs 1 stake(non friendly), they may stake anything as long as both the items, according to the soon-to-come GE prices, stay within a 10% price value of each other. For example, one player may stake a dragon 2 hander(I believe this is around 1.2M). The other player can only stake something that is in the price range of 1.08-1.32M; 10% below, as well as above. Another example: If a player puts up 10M cash, the stake can only be valid if the other player puts up an item(s) or cash within a 9M-11M range. Another useful feature; each player would see how much their item(s) are worth in gp value. If someone puts up 200 flax, they'll have "36,000gp total," if they put up an additional dragon longsword, it will read "136,000gp total," and so on. Both players can put up whatever items they want, check if it is in the 10% range by hitting 'accept,' and duel. If it is not 10%, a message will tell both players that their values do not match the 10% range. How would this benefit the players? Good, old staking. It would be like nothing was changed by the update. Stakers can stake as high as they want, as long as the stakes are fair, which they should be in the first place! How would this benefit jagex? Jagex' original goal was to eliminate multiple account sharers who used the duel arena to quickly, and sneakily get away with trading between two accounts. In this new way of staking, both accounts would have to offer very similar amounts. Because nearly all account sharing involves sharing between a wealthy high level main, and a poor low level, the low level could not offer the high amount of cash, and therefore, not even be able to duel! A quote from the update page: If their main goal was to eliminate duel arena account sharers, then this is a benificial solution. However, I am aware that account sharers will most likely adapt, similar to autoers; but at least, overall, account sharers will take a big blow if this is implemented.
  17. Of course not. It is only human to err. And satisfying one group will only create complaints in another. It is impossible to satisfy everyone's desires. Of course, but it would be wise for jagex to aim for pleasing the majority of the players. After all, one of all MMO's main goals should be to constantly please the players.
  18. What would you expect? Players, as of now, can stake items according to jagex' set market prices, however once the Grand exchange is released, the prices will be converted to player set values. I appreciate that jagex was trying to eliminate multiple account sharers, but at the expense of ruining tens of thousands of stakers, it just doesn't seem like a fair trade-off. I hope we can come up with a solution that will satisfy both players and jagex(I've already seen some excellent suggestions on the RSOF). :) EDIT: Do I still have that headache, or is that a tip.it ad in the picture? :shock:
  19. This is getting bad, I'm currently following a huge riot that a 109(which you can see in front) started about 4 minutes ago.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.