Saru Inc

Ha, that's how I was before I graduated. However, be it Native American Day or Columbus Day, you'd still get the day off, so there's no harm in questioning, right? Entitled bastards :(((( (I kid <3) I don't get school off, so I'm just skipping. I think it's a pointless holiday. Was it not Amerigo who discovered America? Albeit Columbus may have started the socio-cultural fetish, but it was Amerigo... right?

So then what are debating here? lol'd

But isn't everyone's meaning the meaning of life? There certainly can't be a universal opinion.

move to civilization. A la America.

To be honest, I consider asking the meaning of life to be stupid question. And here is why.... Life, is what you make it. It's a completely subjective meaning, thus asking waht is the meaning, is pointless.

Sex is one of the best things life has to offer so it is pretty important to me. My girlfriend is a huge part of my life and she's hot so you could almost even say my life revolves around my heterosexuality. I'm not really expressive about my sexuality but I do enjoy bragging about how hot my girlfriend is (10/10). Still too much. Maybe if Pirate Day died I would be more understanding, but anything with "Day" after it just naturally gets shunned by me. Good man. I mean to be honest, I don't think a national coming out day is needed... at all. When I saw it I was like "whats the point... honestly...?" I just used that as a topic, becuase I know many people who while in tune with their sexuality, kind of keep it behind closed doors. While others flaunt it in front of everyone, and I wanted to know what it was like with you guys.

Ok i confess

after the rain drifts on you and me am i currently feeling you here or am i simply remembering when i used to feel you near

Rinse, and repeat. Seriously, that's the number one way to loose a best friend, is to sleep with their ex. Other way? Sleep with their parent. It's an utter and wholly complete betrayal.

Doubt the human race would survive if men and women weren't attracted to each other :rolleyes: Sperm banks, cloning, and other means would still work. Let me rephrase. Doubt the human race would exist if men and women weren't attracted to each other. Doubt the human race would survive if men and women weren't attracted to each other :rolleyes: Well, before I'm even going to reply to this. I'm going to commit a form of a logically flawed argument, by first understand that with the all the abundance of Matriarchal FLESH in your signature and avatar, you are a poonhound. Thus, I must understand you will never see my way. Still, I will divulge. Ok first? Let's read what I said. "To be honest(and I'm not trolling either) I feel just as awkward around heterosexual people. I really do. I find it (again, being completely serious) bizarre that men and women are attracted to each other. It weirds me out. Which is why despite I hate homophobes, I'm not as judgmental of them as other gay men and women." Now, pay attention to the verbal tonage I used. I am implying that I am aware it is awkward to feel the way I do, (indicated by the comments in the parenthesis). Second, I never said where the human race could reproduce on homosexual intercourse. However, it certainly is possible for the human race to reproduce with homosexuals in it... :) Maybe possible, but not really practical. You said you find it "bizarre" that men and women are attracted to each other when it's pretty much a "dependant" natural way of life, without attraction of opposite sexes, how would humans as well as animals have expanded population. Is human nature really that practical? Is the human condition really practical? Not really, but definitely possible. YOu are missing the point I am making, and assuming to be the point you wish me to make, being that heterosexuality is not natural. Which is not what I said, I am grossed out by it, and however I welcome heterosexuality to all heterosexuals, since they didn't wish to choose it. But it's not the same as "condoning but condemning" I see Heterosexuality as the exact same playing field as homosexuality, just on a different part of it. I don't look down, nor up to heteros, simply across. And again, that's all I ask. Condoning but not condemning places us lower than you, if only by a few inches. edit: incase of confusion, I am aware Machavelli (sp) did not speak about the condoning but not condemning, that was Ralag (sp) however, I feel this attitude to be much more widespread among the population.

well how much of the cussing is you, and how much of it is the goatee speaking through you? These are things we must ask ourselves, if we are to be anything in the world. How does facial hair, change the way we act?

Well, there are lots of different types of things in the world. And seeing as there are 365 days in a year, and trillions of everything in the world, I'd say we have barely anything.

i lold

But in all, honesty, Columbus didn't purposefully kill and enslave the Indians. That's like blaming (I think it was Einstein?) for the atom bomb being dropped on Japan. Columbus just discovered the Americas, his followers* were the ones who moved in. *As in, those coming after him. Someone obviously knows absolutely nothing about history. Columbus forced the Taíno, the tribe on the island, to mine gold for him and if they didn't meet their quota (which was likely since there was next to no gold on the island) him and his men would cut their hands off and leave them to bleed out. When he returned on I want to say his final voyage (not positive) he found that they had rebelled, and him and his men killed hundreds of them. Edit: it was his second trip actually. No need for harsh words, honestly. This forum is way too quick at jumping on a gun and shooting down people. First off, take it with a grain of salt that you think that Columbus/Settlers were harsh murderers, where if anything they were simply proving Evolution. TTanT disagrees, don't hang him for it. That makes no sense... what does that have to do with evolution at all? And those are historically documented events. I'm not telling him that he should hate Columbus, I was just saying that he was certainly responsible for violence towards native people. Although to be fair the first line wasn't totally necessary. Nvm @ Satenza. lol'd Yea I didn't mean to say that, meant to say they were practicing survival of the fittest, I was also talking about Evolution on a different forum, and I got them confused XD. So disregard that sentence. And you're right, Columbus did commit some of that, but why? Let's see..... What did Columbus do before he set sail? Oh yea. Begged for flipping money. You don't think the King and Queen of Spain wouldn't have hacked off his head for wasting their time if he came back empty handed? Them Catholics like their blood... I'm always going to side with the settlers essentially, if only because I've reviewed all the facts incredibly extensively *regarding the entire colonization process* and unless someone can provide evidence that will convince me otherwise. People paint Indians in these victim portraits, no idea why.

Why do you think homosexuality is not natural? What makes something natural? How does homosexual couples getting married affect you? Why would you be against it? I mean, even I'll admit, sex is effectively for reproducing. And effectively for having fun. Hehe. I meant on an instinctual level, down in the Animal Kingdom. If you're looking at it from the Evolutionary standpoint (vs. my religious standpoint), I'm going to guess that the first Homo (SEE EVEN GAYS WERE WAY BACK WHEN) Erectus first evolved into Homo Sapiens Sapiens etc., they didn't have as intuned emotions. Doubt the human race would survive if men and women weren't attracted to each other :rolleyes: Well, before I'm even going to reply to this. I'm going to commit a form of a logically flawed argument, by first understand that with the all the abundance of Matriarchal FLESH in your signature and avatar, you are a poonhound. Thus, I must understand you will never see my way. Still, I will divulge. Ok first? Let's read what I said. "To be honest(and I'm not trolling either) I feel just as awkward around heterosexual people. I really do. I find it (again, being completely serious) bizarre that men and women are attracted to each other. It weirds me out. Which is why despite I hate homophobes, I'm not as judgmental of them as other gay men and women." Now, pay attention to the verbal tonage I used. I am implying that I am aware it is awkward to feel the way I do, (indicated by the comments in the parenthesis). Second, I never said where the human race could reproduce on homosexual intercourse. However, it certainly is possible for the human race to reproduce with homosexuals in it... :) By not condoning it, are you not also condemning it? When a President says he is not condoning Marijuana, he is condemning it, for all intensive purposes. And that's the problem with homosexuality, it'll never be ok to be talked about, even in context in a lot of social circles. Examples? You: "yea so I just spent the weekend fishing" Me: "sounds fun. me and my husband just worked on our __________ all weekend. haha. he's epic" or You: "I'm going to the movies, wanna come?" Me: "Can't, I got a counseling meeting for LGBT youth" You: "Dude, just say an appointment, no need to keep on bringing it up" Me: "Am I bringing it up? If I said an "appointment" wouldn't you ask which kind?" ------ With the last sentence in mind, that is an important thing to remember. When some people find out one is homosexual, they view them as gay, not as Saru, or Th3 etc. So for example, I'm just one to explain what I am doing, I won't just be like "got an appointment" I'd say "I got a dr's appointment, tetnis shot time. " etc. Now if I was heterosexual? Would not be noticed. However if my actions are influenced by a homosexual "lifestyle" *cringes* naturally I'm rubbing it in your face. Which is why despite it being obvious at work, I'm not going to officially like... tell people. Because most of the people there are like "keep it in your pants and in your house" etc.

But in all, honesty, Columbus didn't purposefully kill and enslave the Indians. That's like blaming (I think it was Einstein?) for the atom bomb being dropped on Japan. Columbus just discovered the Americas, his followers* were the ones who moved in. *As in, those coming after him. Someone obviously knows absolutely nothing about history. Columbus forced the Taíno, the tribe on the island, to mine gold for him and if they didn't meet their quota (which was likely since there was next to no gold on the island) him and his men would cut their hands off and leave them to bleed out. When he returned on I want to say his final voyage (not positive) he found that they had rebelled, and him and his men killed hundreds of them. Edit: it was his second trip actually. No need for harsh words, honestly. This forum is way too quick at jumping on a gun and shooting down people. First off, take it with a grain of salt that you think that Columbus/Settlers were harsh murderers, where if anything they were simply proving Evolution. TTanT disagrees, don't hang him for it.

^^ hah was reading those, were awesome. ANd i hate horror stories/movies. Some of them aren't really freaky at all.. And I think some sentences were left unfinished.

he discovered the islands to the south, unless my 1st grade memory is wrong :XD:

gross :| liquor does not interest me. This includes all forms of it.

Hmmm. I was about to say to think of myself as pond scum, burn the surrounding villages, and kill all the philanthropists. It seems, I may have just met my match. Oh well, my side has warm soft pretzels. Your side has cookies. I win. -------------------------- My aspiration is to be an inspiration. And that's just what my personality is. While on these forums I may be a bit carefree with my posting style, and just plain rude in some debates, irl my goal is to be a role model. Of course I want lots of money, power, girls, etc. etc. Real estate as well :thumbup: But in the end, all of that doesn't matter (ALERT ALERT: CORNY CLICHE PHRASE ON THE HORIZON, ALL TAKE COVER), because when it all boils down, all I want someone to say is "you helped me be a better person," "you showed me a better way to do something and I appreciate it," "you're my inspiration." That, or "here's the key to the country don't start wars with Ireland."

I beg to differ. I don't have any statistical links to back me up, but I know there has been surveys that have shown a correlation between income and sexuality/gender/ethnic origin. Like how skinny people average more money than Obese people, pretty sure it would apply to sexuality too if you're really open about it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberace You guys just love to make arguments, don't you. Just [bleep]ing love it. That guy made money because he was a pianist, an actor, and whatever else he was. I'm talking about, sitting on a couch, being gay, do you make money? No. Playing the piano, makes money? Yes. But no ones going to give you a check because you're gay or straight. They'll give you money for the work you do. I will though agree with sexual orientation discrimination, but, they shouldn't be talking about it in work. I love debating :) Err more like nails in the eyes i'm right you're wrong... But yes, actually. It's called LGBT scholarships.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAO4EVMlpwM Discuss the epicness of vid.

bank worth?

Trust me, there be some douchebag gays. When gays are "bullied" as younger children, they, like many others develop compassion, and are more considerate, thoughtful, and idk. good traits and stuff. Those who are born in places where being gay is accepted, they actually tend to develop complexes worse than Larry the Cable Guy, because they feel entitled being gay. When in fact, they are just the left overs of a primordial soup bedpan.

fml. i totally just bought like, 30,000 business cards "Saru Inc, a Shiny Corporation" but now that we ain't an item... We certainly can't be printed on an item either... ummm... There's always Bows I guess. But sometimes he be messing with his bows and arrows too much, I do not like going apple buying with him.