Saru Inc

Try honey or some kind of butter menthol. Usually drinking a big glass of glass helps me a lot. Gargling salt water is supposed to help too, but I can't do that without puking :-# fixed. I want some chinese food. Dear god, I wish I lived in China. I'm pretty sure thats culturally ignorant. I'm pretty sure I want general tso :(((((

My core belief on questions like this is: It stops the possibilities that could come from that person, and they were undeserved. The last part is important, because technically prison takes away possibilities. Also: Four pages? wow, this forum really likes homosexuals.

I'm willing to entrust them with my life. After all, they all just wanna help out, right? For a liberal, you seem pretty paranoid of the government. For a conservative, you seem pretty dismissive of the concepts this country was founded on. The USA has always been about openness, but when we stumble across an immoral war, a bad president, and a bunch of knuckleheaded military gun-nuts, it gets hard to find the statistics. Assange's seemingly extremist actions would be unnecessary had the government stuck to its own principles in the first place. But I'll let you be. After all, questioning authority is sinful, right? I hope not. [bleep], all I do is blatantly break rules to break them, or just disregard authority because I deem it unworthy. So, I guess I'm a sinner. Oh wait. Also, I'm not a conservative. I took a political compass test, and it said (which I agree) really my only die hard conservative beliefs fall on the economy. As well a smidget in some other places. And I'm aware of what the country was founded on, but that doesn't change my opinion. And how was the Iraqi war an immoral war? And no, I don't want sarcasm. You seem pretty caught up on this blonde. My advice: masturbation. Or kidnapping + masturbation.

Wow. How many hours a day did you fish? THIS IS SERIOUS QUESTION

Don't be fooled by what wikileaks "tried" to do. The fact that the US made the information "CLASSIFIED" means that they didn't want any of it leaked to the public. If the US openly cooperated with wikileaks in further censoring the information they were to leak, what would that mean to you? That posting sensitive information is a legitimate thing to do? Here US government, you can have this olive branch from your olive tree we're about to cut down. HERE HERE! Don't be fooled by what wikileaks "tried" to do. The fact that the US made the information "CLASSIFIED" means that they didn't want any of it leaked to the public. If the US openly cooperated with wikileaks in further censoring the information they were to leak, what would that mean to you? That posting sensitive information is a legitimate thing to do? Here US government, you can have this olive branch from your olive tree we're about to cut down. So, you're willing to let the government deny you information? Information about actions that they have taken in your name, with your money, and possibly your vote? I'm willing to entrust them with my life. After all, they all just wanna help out, right? For a liberal, you seem pretty paranoid of the government.

I think the most overwhelming thing in this entire thread, is simply the irony. " He stands as an indictment of them. " I wonder why you said "them."

I think Pasta was being sarcastic...

Why wouldn't it be allowed? However, it is suspicious. Do you get pissed off every time you see someone eating mint chocolate ice cream? (Assuming you don't like it)

Rough drafts are lies made by teachers to trick students.

need moar links.

What I want to know, is the reason that his success, has affected you so. I concur. I watched Dexter. Got though the 8 episodes Netflix has on instant play. I now hate Netflix. I have to wait 3 days to get the other disc.

TWO AND A HALF MEN DESERVES TWO AND A HALF STARS. out of 67 total. DO NOT WANT I have nothing more relevant [cabbage] to say.

You'll get the last laugh in about 20 years, when they take your order at a fast food restaurant. But the worse part is, they may just be your boss. People have this idea that (and I don't just mean you, a lot of people believe it) a) if you're an idiot in high school you're an idiot for life or b) idiots don't become bosses. I think once you get out into a larger career field (and note I don't say this condescendingly at all), you'll find unfortunately "idiots" become bosses a lot more commonly than expected.

Maybe thats what he meant, but that's not what he said. And once again, expanding on what I said previously: I'm a pragmatist: I'm not sure that I'd have the guts to shove someone in front of a trolley to save a dozen construction workers, but if one person has to die to prevent torture, genocide, illegal wars, the deaths of millions and violations of people's personal rights, then so be it. We trade over a million lives each year for the convenience of travel by vehicle, why is it unreasonable to trade one for the absence of the above? I would also like to point out, that as of yet, not a single death has resulted from this transparency, nor does any seem likely. Seems like a knee-jerk reaction from people who really don't want to be held accountable. EDIT: Thanks Skull: I was starting to wonder if my linguistic skills had abandoned me entirely - normally people understand my position, even if they don't agree with it. So if your brother and sister were in a special ops mission to take out a high profile taliban leader, and someone hundreds of miles away leaked that plan. 3 weeks later, you receive two pine boxes air shipped to you, and you're ok with that? As well, you are missing the key point, though I'm assuming you're intentionally leaving it out. The information doesn't have to be leaked, and the lives will still be saved. You imply that if you don't leak the information, that lives would be saved? That is not what I said. I said that if you leaked the documents lives would be LOST. I never said anything good would come out of it. Being a pragmatist doesn't mean anything.

I did. I also chucked in an explanation of why I felt that way, completely free of charge. You edited that in after I posted, nice try though. However, " No one complains that reporters risk their lives in war zones: we value information. If I knew that publishing something that would upset the Fundies, I would publish it despite the death threats and assassination attempts, if the information was of value. Wikileaks would let me publish it without being identified, and bring it to much broader public attention." Does not answer: " "I also wonder what's one's argument that supports Wiki Leaks, if Wikileaks posts material that endangers one's lives. " What's not to figure out what I mean? How would you justify Wikileaks existence on this planet, if someone died because of it? Anyone. Not just a soldier. Anyone. Justify it." Third times the charm?

You didn't answer my question.

"I also wonder what's one's argument that supports Wiki Leaks, if Wikileaks posts material that endangers one's lives. " What's not to figure out what I mean? How would you justify Wikileaks existence on this planet, if someone died because of it? Anyone. Not just a soldier. Anyone. Justify it.

You didn't answer my question.

This post made me giggle deep down in places of my heart I rarely visit. I thus appreciate this. I also appreciate your appreciation for Freedom of the Press, ironic as it may be. I also wonder what's one's argument that supports Wiki Leaks, if Wikileaks posts material that endangers one's lives.

My parents said they are fine with my getting an apartment, even if it's financially unwise. However, when they found out I was getting it with a girl, they beyond freaked out. They basically said the moment I leave the door of the house is the moment I'm no longer their son... For getting an apartment... With an engaged woman who knows I'm gay... I wonder what they would say if they found out I was gay... Btw. I love Dexter, freaking amazing show.

spanish people can be white if they......... im not finishing this post.

spanish gays are cool tho :thumbup:

I approve. Going to Chinese with my sister when I pick her up from the Airport in a bit.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/colloquial http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/colloquialism AKA: It's called a regional dialect, it's a part of our language. -------------------------------------- Ants. Our house has the biggest [bleep]ing (pardon the language...) ant problem in the world. I have ants all over my desk as we speak, and not ONE drop of food in my room. (We're not allowed to eat outside of the kitchen now, damn these are BAD!)

Its endangering soldiers and other innocent peoples lives right? And this, is why I'm not debating it. But it's not. The Government comes out with the same BS every time about it risking lives and it's absolute crap. Of ALL the times Wikileaks have released 'life-risking' documents, how many people have died from it? None. They're not bloody advertising troop movements and pointing a big neon sign saying 'HERE'S A WEAK SPOT GO KILL THEM'. It's exposing the hypocrisies and corruption of their regime. This doesn't equate to 'blood on Julian Assange's hands'. And this post exactly proves in even further detail why I'm not debating this. You didn't even know who Assange was. LOL endangering lives. *America invades middle east or bombs Yemen* THIS IS ON YOUR HANDS WIKILEAKS! So what are you going on about now.