malo2

but its just the prices that fall, the value of items stays the same, just the value of money rises. This update drains money like crazy, so money is just becoming worth alot more.

i bet u guys couldnt imagein how hard it was for me to keep myself from shouting out when i read the update......i was at the school library....-_-

well atleast china wont make runescape illegal :lol:

to be honest, runescape is a little bit smaller than i thought compared to other games, but its rising fast. Wow is a little hard to belive, true it had a good jump start (ty to wc) and plenty of advertising, but thats still hell of a big number.

zezima was first to get slayer, none of the four previoust maxed skillers got to farming first (i think). Theres a good chance it will be neither of them again, but all of them will get there eventually espechially zezima, then hell be at the top again -_-

I imagine jagex will be adding new stuff to pohs later (new furniture ect) great skill btw.

thats sweet, i got 8mil rotting in my bank, and if the value double its would be greats

In your point of view :P in my opinion the atheist usually uses science, which is irrelevant to God's existence. Evolution? God could've used it. To say "it makes more sense that it just randomly happened", is merely a matter of opinion. To me, it makes more sense that something caused it to happen the way it did. Do you really thin kscientists just make up the stiff they figure out? the things scientsts claim have been proven to be facts after a long time of research, its not something they just decided to belive in and told the rest of the world to belive, thats religion, not science, science isnt just another religion, they have proof to support their discoveries, religions just have tales and verses that an unnamed author wrote long ago. (ps. see my sig) Do you realize that your response had nothing to do with his post? He said that science is irrelevant to the existence of God, and you said that science proves the things it claims. Where's the connection? His point was not that science is wrong, but rather that science deals only in the natural, therefore it is irrelevant to God, the supernatural. If you had actually read the entire 63 pages, as you implied earlier, you would see that most of the questions had been discussed and answered a long time ago. Perhaps they try to prove themselves right out of love? They believe that their religion is the truth, and they care enough about others to make sure that other people know the truth. And if you haven't noticed, every institution than humans are involved in is corrupted, not just religion. It's much more logical to say that humans are inherantly corrupt, rather than that religion is inherantly corrupt. What is all this evidence you're talking about? Evidence for what? Evidence against religion? If you're talking about science being able to proove its claims, as you were earlier, I refer you to my first paragraph about how science has nothing to do with God's existence. ok this argument is so hopless in just going to leave, i doubt you have ever taken more than 5 mins to think about all of what you said, im sorry for not taking the time to explain all of that, but im tired and ive gotta go anyway, cya everyone.

You're point doesn't make much sense because we're not trying to prove religion right, because we don't have to. You can't prove it right, all we are doing is explaining our faith. And I'm glad you didn't let your biased point of view affect your analysis of the 63 pages. Coming from my point of view, the religious argument is far from "struggling." when theres an argument going on then theres two people trying to prove themselves right, and over the last few pages, thats what has been going on. and in my opinion, whne one side only has a few people, that are doing a pretty bad job of providing facts, rather than stories, then theyre struggling. i guess some people see the world struggling in a different way. ohwell. 1) We are not trying to prove each other right or wrong. This discussion is not about proof. Read insane's post above. 2) Just because there are more athiests on this board than religious people, doesn't mean one side is doing better than the other. Once again, read insane's post above. 3) It's only your opinion that the religious side's points are "bad" and that's why your version of "struggling" doesn't work. You can't decide who is doing a better job in a discussion based on which idea you support. 1. when i said the athiest are overpowering the religions in an argument, It was an opinion in general, wethere its a religious forum or not, the argument and evidence dont change. You dont need alot of people to win an argument, its quality that counts not quantity, if religion would have evidence to support itself, one person with an iq above 80 would be enought, even if theres a million people on the otherside. If somethings right, you can prove it right no matter how many opponments u have. 2. you may not be debating over religion, but everyone else is, like i mentioned here, theres more than one person on this thread, so you cant just decide for everybod wether theyre debating or not.

In your point of view :P in my opinion the atheist usually uses science, which is irrelevant to God's existence. Evolution? God could've used it. To say "it makes more sense that it just randomly happened", is merely a matter of opinion. To me, it makes more sense that something caused it to happen the way it did. Do you really thin kscientists just make up the stiff they figure out? the things scientsts claim have been proven to be facts after a long time of research, its not something they just decided to belive in and told the rest of the world to belive, thats religion, not science, science isnt just another religion, they have proof to support their discoveries, religions just have tales and verses that an unnamed author wrote long ago. (ps. see my sig) i dont think you really need to worry about those parts very much, you wouldnt really have anything better to say when youre waiting for the other side to offer arguments, sine I see so many arguments posted on the previous page that just arent answered. Now the point of saying that, is simply to ask, why are religions people ever trying to prove themselves right (if they are ofcourse, its not one person for you to decide of, if theyre arguing or not btw, there are alot of people, some argue, some dont) when they dont even know what they belive in, religion is just so corrupted (like its always been in countless ways), that its just amazing that there are people still defending it. The burden of proof really doesn't rest on anyone in this thread - it's not a thread titled "prove God is true" or "prove God is non-existent", it's a thread titled "do you believe in God?", meaning the burden of opinion/proof is on the poster. This isn't a scientific method-based forum where sure answers are written in textbooks. I dont think the title of the thread really decides what people are going to post, the moment i saw the thread i knew what id see inside, and obviousy, there are 2 sides trying to deside wether religion makes sence or not. Now, in other words of what i was trying to say (man its hard to explain :x): the argument over religion is always so rediculous, because one side is trying prove its self right so hard without any evidnce, whist the opposite side has all the ovidence in the world. Its like an aurmoured man with a large gun, versus a defensless man with nothing, you know what i mean? See first paragraph. It's not a matter of proof, since God cannot be proven or disproven. It's a matter of exercising our minds, playing devil's advocate. Y'know, fun intellectual stuff :P And just for the record, God does not equate religion. ok that one really had nothing to it :shock:

You're point doesn't make much sense because we're not trying to prove religion right, because we don't have to. You can't prove it right, all we are doing is explaining our faith. And I'm glad you didn't let your biased point of view affect your analysis of the 63 pages. Coming from my point of view, the religious argument is far from "struggling." when theres an argument going on then theres two people trying to prove themselves right, and over the last few pages, thats what has been going on. and in my opinion, whne one side only has a few people, that are doing a pretty bad job of providing facts, rather than stories, then theyre struggling. i guess some people see the world struggling in a different way. ohwell.

the ability to controll massive amounts of energy.

thats really gotta suck heres my suggestion, study hard, go to the militray (burn off anger), then colledge, the rest is up to you. thats all ive got, because i doubt writing an apology letter will help for long. But really, understand that gangsters are just a bunch of morons with iqs below 20 and in need of lives, the ugly side of the world that has nothing better to do with its self.

ok, so theres 63 pages worth of argument, mostly of the athiest doing a good job of proving religion crap, and the religious struggling to keep the athiest from proving it wrong. Now understand, religion wasnt a fact to begin with, so what the argument should be like, is the religious proving religion right, and the athiest trying to prove it wrong. The way its going now, I dont see why anybody is still hoping to prove religion true.

this prank is older than my parents

fletching does get randoms, just rarely, and its weird. I never got any randoms for about 5-6mil xp straight but yesterday, for some reason I started to get the cubes, got 2 yesterday. weird huh? :?

more xp than needed :lol:

Well, I guess I'm an exception. 8-) Got Guthans Helm, then next chest, guthans helm with veracs brassard. Here's the screenie :D In the chatbox Real-Life friend didn't even belive me. Lol thats not best possible tho, actually quite far away, because its 2 spears and a dhelm (i mean dmed) in one chest. But quite a few people have gotten 2 items from 1 chest before, thats how i know its possible.

Not having religion is like not having walls around your fort in enemy terretory. If you don't have em, your pretty much dead. can you please explain what youre saying?

1.) At that same time, christians believed in whiches, which the bible says there were none. Hence, there religious views were entirely different. 2.) (answered by tpam) 3.)After reviewing the bible on Noahs flood, I find that it never says the ENTIRE earth flooded. Also, it might have not been litteral rain. The area where Noah lived is possibly the present day black sea. If you notice, it is connected to the medeteranian by a very thin strip of water surrounded by mountains. It is possible that the Mediteranian might have been held up by the mountains that use to be where the thin strip of water is. This means the flood was possibly more of a dam burst than a flash flood. On that note, this is also possibly why the bible says it had never rained before. It could be translated into "The water had not burst through before. 4.) See number 1. 5.) First of all, god created man on the 6th day. Second, the bible says 10,000 years in heavan is like one second on earth, and one second in heaven is like 10,000 years on earth. In other words, the word "day" doesn't mean a litteral day. 6.) There was no scientific proof that there was a comet that hit the earth. 7.) 1. It is possible that it really is god's will to go to war. 2. according to leaders, if you commit a crime, you will go to jail, not hell. you really have proven nothing at all, you just provided possible alternatives, some of which dont make much sence, or just dont really prove anything.

its hard to belive you havent heard of runners. :roll:

mines guthans skirt the best possible i belive is 2 guthan spears and a dhelm, yes you can get 2 barrow items at once. The chances of that reward are beyond impossible tho, i doubt anyone will get that in years to come.

Hey Blue Tear!! Bubsa, hahaha >.< As to the topic.. I log in from time to time just to make sure that Jagex doesn't delete my account. they dont deleta your acount, i once logged in on an account that was over 300 days old. I personally do actively play atm.

Basic bodily function. So how come when it stinks, people have to hold their noses? who says they have to? they just do for some reason, and it makes life a little easier anyway.

lol I have an extra join in my arms, which isnt very common. This means I can twist both of my arms 360 deg.