Boris5000
-
Posts
1741 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Boris5000
-
If the labour government is described as one that spends money, then the conservative government, by definition should be one that conserves money. But in reality that isn't the case. Infact in the 7 years of lies, and cuts and all round lunacy the deficit has grown, but it is still somehow labours fault. :rolleyes: (Boris5000 is in no way a Politician or an Economist - Just a poor boy from a poor family.) The last labour government (ala Blairite Labour), was a peculiar breed that was essentially Center-Right Left (Tories being Center-Right Right). That labour essentially crumbled when the recession hit and w.e money was available needed to be used to bailout banks. Now we have a labour that we could actually call socialist (Left, but not as left as the green party) that is committed to spending money in the NHS and Education, a leader who is described as "radically" left, un-electable, a terrorist sympathiser and someone who would run the country into the ground. But he was continuously elected the leader of the labour party (atleast twice). He is more interested in peaceful resolutions for conflict. And at least attempting to give the working class of the United Kingdom a chance. What really [bleep]ed me off, was when one of the live debates essentially boiled down to "Jeremy Corbyn, why won't you kill millions of innocent people with nuclear weapons? Theresa May said she would do it in a heartbeat, but you refuse!". What also [bleep]ed me off is that the people who rely on the public services would rather have voted Tory just because they didn't like Corbyn. Edit: I need a few more [bleep]s. [bleep] [bleep] [bleep]
-
As it stands, depending on which side of the fence you sit it is 'good' for both sides. The Conservative leader "lost" the election (lost too many seats, to not obtain complete majority), but still won. And the Opposition (Labour) "won" the election (gained more seats but not enough for a majority, even with a minor-opponent coalition) but nonetheless lost. To reach a majority, the conservative party is attempting/succeeded in forming a coalition with a NI party the DUP. The kicker here is the conservative campaign spent most of the time slating the opposition leader for being a terrorist sympathiser - then the conservative party upon not reaching a majority then (attempts to) form a coalition with the DUP (which is backed by terrorists, apparently (according to my social media bubble and reddit, such research)). And according to slogans from the DUP they expressly implied that they were not going to listen to the Tories "Vote for people who listen to you and not listen to the tories" (OWTTE). In total I believe there was essentially 2,500 votes (counting the constituencies that have narrows vote margins) that mattered between whether a labour majority (or Labour/SNP/LD coalition) would win - and I feel bitter about it. As someone deeply invested in Science, A hard brexit is potentially catastrophic for my growth as an academic in the United Kingdom. And the results of this election closes some doors for me, and a lot more for others. n.b. Nothing is really confirmed yet. So I crying prematurely. I would like a re-election tbh. EDIT: Also I should add, that now that there is a stronger opposition it is likely that certain policies which are particularly bad will be unlikely to make their way out of parliament.
-
I saw a dragon impling by the fishing guild, but u weren't on go figure lel even though you stopped looking :D
-
Yeah but I remember when that law passed the law was intended to be a warning label for stuff people wouldn't expect to have health problems and would impact their decision making. Such as some brand of plates has x and you may not want it. Instead they screwed with the law by making the wording so vauge that literally every building has a label and has chemical names that are 30 syllables long to where its useless information. So the warning labels are intentionally made useless by that especially when Oxygen can be placed as a cancer causing chemical. Hold on there Chuck, don't forget about Di-Hydrogen Monoxide, the leading cause of dysentery!
-
[bleep]ing Saq. Ruined everything with his gimped leg and hopeless, numerous, romantic encounters.
-
You got a mouse with more that 3 buttons? One of them may be configured to trigger backwards while browsing the internet. You may accidentally be hitting the offending mouse button once in a while.
-
Woo-Hoo.
