Giordano

Hm, I hadn't thought of that. Certain quest bosses and bosses in general would be horribly ruined. I still always like the idea of some sort of class distinction. Not necessarily classes you get restricted on, but at least like Elder Scrolls like somebody above me said. But for classes like WoW and such, I prefer not in RuneScape. As said a million times before, it sets RS apart from the others.

Heh, same here. Especially when the tattoo is so over-used like a flower, butterfly, or cross. Though I can't agree with the piercings though, I'll rather have the world have their entire body filled with tattoos than have one piercing.

Fixed. Better fix yours now. :razz:

A better way to of gone is kill the higher ups of the IRS. Give him and us a break. :razz:

That was awesome. [hide=spoilers] Spyro = Win.[/hide]

Woot, I finally finished my entry! It's not as good as I want it to be, but me and my friend (who provided for the voices) are pretty tied up with our other machinima. Still, I like it. Will post when it converts + Youtube approves it. EDIT: Well, that was fast.

You don't get real life movies neither? It just the same stuff. Just with more internet humor than needed sometimes, but, all good. Anyway, today I'ma start on the voices for my entry with a friend. Then off to editing! It feels kinda good to do this again with RuneScape; last time I made RS machinima was years, years ago ha. :razz:

But that still means an idea can be so stupid that no way it can be true. At this point God and Darth Vader have the same weight in argument.

The thing is, once a God enters the picture, as in a deity who's absolutly perfect in it's essence, and that can decide what's good and what isn't, the ideology that's stretchable becomes a very fanatic, none-stretchable religion. Your definitions and labels may be nice, but it's the final outcome I'm discussing. Sure you could call Philosophy a religion. And? What of it? Bottom line is that Philosophy has no greater entity, and the different philosofical statements can be proven, unproven, and proven again. Religion cannot be proven, and neither unproven, which is where fanatics come from. As for your comment about the followers of religion who make it's cons- A. That's not entirely true (Slavery, Anti-Gayness, etc). B. If you call what's in A a followers' fault, then the pros of religion should be considered the followers' result aswell. C. It matters not where the cons come from, only that they exist and that they wouldn't have existed if it wasn't for religion. Who says religion can't be proven? You can, but until one does, you can't go around saying it's fact. Cuz it's not...yet.

Deloreans ftw!

History's longest custody battle...

From what I understand, the Empire started to rely less on clones when they became imperialized and started to recuit folks. And what I always read/heard, driods don't have a compariable intelect for strategy and tactics when events change and whatsonot. Though, driods like R2-D2 and that bounty-hunter one disprove that...

I see the idea of it but don't think it'll go down too well. This will be like YouTube: idiots like Fred would get all the clicks and those with actual talent would get very little. Thus idiots like Fred get money, but whats worse, it came from those talented folks.

I smell Anon.

Oh okay I get your question now. Issues cleared.

Truly pathetic. If the internet was a privatized service these politicans would have shares on, Australians wouldn't see censorships rather the opposite. (with huge rip-offs, of course)

This guy's voice sounds familiar...familiar as in those YouTube "current event bloggers" that get their info from news lines articles and conspiracy websites. As for the actual gold standard vs. dollar, for what little I understand of it, would prefer to use the dollar because it creates an "artificial" economy not based on real world objects; similar to money in banks (it's not phyiscal money, but numbers in a computer).

Getting pissed off over a fictional piece of work... Pretty much as sad as the guy who fainted when he got the first Halo 3.

*Wales. :angry: If you're referring to England then you say England, if you're referring to Scotland you say Scotland...the same with Wales and Ireland. If you're referring to England, Wales and Scotland as a whole then you say Britain. If you're referring to the UK in general then you're talking about Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The British Isles is England, Wales, Scotland and the whole of Ireland. And FYI, they're all individual countries. Wales is *not* a part of England! :angry: Political maps seem to disagree :???: <_< It's like Canada, USA, and Mexico all join one single nation. Each countries have their own states/provinces but now THEY'RE perceived as the states/provinces of the new North American nation.

Not a population crisis, but just a population. If you place a bomb in the middle of a crowd of people, most of them will die. If you place a bomb in the middle of a field, hardly anybody if anybody would be injured. It depends on the location of the disaster and we can't really stop populating because of disasters; It's ridiculous to think so.

That's just intolerantive and dumb. I can't believe human beings really believe these things (even if that particular one was a joke, I'm certain some believe it to be atleast partly true). To all you gay haters, here's a question- If you saw any graphical/real gay act, heard of it, or had the ability to perform such acts- Would you become gay? Even the slightest? If your answer is yes- newsflash- you already are gay. I assume most of you would answer with "no", in which case I've got another question- If you wouldn't become gay, what makes you think other straights would? Wow, the irony. You didn't get the point of the picture, didn't you? It's supposed to mean that when gays marry there won't be any negative effect to match the paranoia of society. Think a little bit before you judge a picture on the spot. And what's up with the second question?

50+ degrees F on average throughout this week. Nobody freezing their balls off in California right now. :thumbsup:

Bingo, somebody nailed it. There is still land availble: a simple road trip across western North America is surely enough for you think otherwise. The problem with urban overpopulation is a different discussion to this at hand and would probably fall under the high density vs. suburbs debate. Farmland is also not an issue. Farms in America make feed an entire continent and then some. Farms in Central America and Asia don't feed as much not because there's a difference of land but because there's a difference in technology. Technology isn't a population problem, but a distribution-economic problem. As for the actual topic, my views of it: :wall:

...four blocks down. ARTILLERY TIEM!!!11 Definition of overkill and awesome: "Secret Weapons over Normandy" ...

WTH's Fat Tuesday?