Sir_Squab

Eh. For what, two weeks? A month tops? After that time is up, how fast will those spins level up those skills?

FTFY Banned for not solving the problem of a lack of booze and naked women.

Canadian price is actually $500. But yeah, employee discounts ftw. Not technically allowed to say what it is, but let's just say my discount is high enough that it being $100 cheaper in the states doesn't bother me a whole lot.

[spoiler=Short rant] I hate the editor. Took me literally ten minutes to make this post. First off, having the image go directly into an image while making the post is annoying. Secondly, the stupid auto spoiler thing is broken or something. I can't get it to work. Hide tags are where it's at. So, remember that Lego Super Star Destroyer I was building a while ago? Finally built the damned thing. [hide][/hide] [hide][/hide] Next step is the Lego Imperial Shuttle.

Math is probably too "inside the box" for her.

Yes

What're BDs?

Tbh I was just wondering if the bosses from the Tzhaar quest were fixed. Pretty sure they were way tougher then they needed to be when I tired fighting them. I got stuck on the group of enemies before the last boss and kinda gave up - afterall, if the enemies before the boss gave me so much trouble, how would I beat the boss itself?

So I just hopped on RS for the first time in months. About to do While The World Wakes. Questions. Are Drygores still OP as [bleep]? Basically, did Jagex fix the equipment scaling that means that higher tier equipment renders combat triangle and general balance obsolete? And the last EoC update Jagex did, they made a lot of monsters stronger, and some became way too strong. Is that fixed?

Tell her, "hey, wanna hook up right before you head back home for the summer." If she says yes, you get a hook up. If she says no, well, she's gonna be back home pretty quick so whatever. #terribleadvice

EDIT: Sonofa[bleep]. Totally wanted to be like "yo guys the first person to call the youth young lazy gossipers was a greek philosopher" and then that [bleep]ing libertarian beat me to it.

Banned by the Azorius Senate.

I think of him as loki. Lots of names. I had an old name once. But this name is who I am now.

Banned for quoting.

I'd probably be stewing it over in your shoes as well, but the simplest way is to just ask "hey that guy I saw you with the other day, is he your boyfriend?" If she says yes, you know it's time to stop. If she says no, you keep going for her.

...Slightly.

Banned because hunting is your lowest stat.

Muggi we know you're poly but that doesn't mean you should try to sleep with everyone in this thread.

Fired for firing the president of the US.

Well played sir. Well played. Banned because I don't know where your avatar is from, and because she isn't holding a Gunsword.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice! You plan on sticking around, or are you just dropping by ol' chum? The leader of the Reddit clan is named Hiroki >.> I'll bet there's a reason for that :P -- -- Been looking for a new thrill and as luck would have it, a girl I talked to like 2 years ago hit me up on facebook. Hadn't talked to her since truly. She had a boyfriend at the time, but now she's single. And has nipple piercings. And a kid. weeeeee You seem to attract a certain type of woman.

Banned for having a signature below your signature

K, first off, I high doubt bus cameras would have helped in any way for the bus decapitation. He was seen by plenty of people, and to my knowledge there was never any doubt about at all, in the slightest, about who did it. Second example. Seems helpful here. At worst it's a minor obstacle for the bomber to overcome, at best it identifies the bomber. Third. You have a very good point here lol. Supporting cams in public places but not on public transport? Lol.

I will never understand why this stuff bothers people. There's nothing to worry about unless you're committing crimes. [bleep]. You. Yeah, we're just gonna randomly search your house. Don't worry, there's nothing to worry about unless you're actually committing a crime. You look funny. We're taking you down to the station and searching you. Don't worry, unless there's nothing to worry about unless you actually commit a crime. Following your logic, that's also acceptable. "Any society willing to give up a little liberty for a little security will deserve neither and lose both." I like this quote too. Now, granted, providing studies there are studies that show that video cameras prevent crime, I'm ok with cameras. Although, it does make me wonder - are there studies on how effective video cameras are at crime prevention, and if so, what do they say? We're talking strictly about camera survailence. Again, one idea doesn't apply to all. Not worrying because you did nothing wrong would wonderfully apply to cameras. It does not apply well to random (racially motivated) random searches (which waste time to the detainee). They're different things so please don't take the justification for one specific security method and apply it to all security methods. Correction. You're talking strictly about camera surveillance. I'm talking about the phrase "There's nothing to worry about unless you're committing crimes." I'm talking about the attitude that says invasion of privacy is ok because if you're doing nothing wrong, you don't have a problem with us looking. I could easily see a person making a rational, well thought out post explaining why the video surveillance on the train isn't a bad thing. Hell, I could write most of it myself. But you see, that's never what I was actually talking about.