Sir_Squab

Sixteenthed.

Wrong. It improved their lives. I'm tired.

I third this.

Banned because I'm confused about what happened on the last page.

Banned because I actually made more posts then you on page 1841. Sorry to burst your bubble. Actually, no, I'm not sorry. Tis what it is.

[bleep] you. In the dick. With a spoon. With a sharp, serrated spoon. What the 'ell. I don't like mornings. Or morning people.

[bleep] you. In the dick. With a spoon. With a sharp, serrated spoon.

Banned for not banning me. I AM A BAN MASOCHIST

<*clobbers Squab with a pack of trout*> BANNED BECAUSE I'M NOT FEMALE! :angry: ~D. V. "But, I'll sure clobber you with fury like one!" Devnull Banned for not knowing what a mary sue is. I'm calling you a mary sue because the persona you use in the forum games is OP as shit, and therefore incredibly boring.

You wake up in the gutter without remembering the night before. You wonder if you were fired from some shadowy organization for telling your friends about your work there.

Banned for being a mary-sue.

Cursed by the "Ban of Xhina." The curse is that you're banned.

Banned by the king of old Xhina.

CLEARLY YOU HAD SEX WITH A MONGOOSE

Fired from the Izzet guild for doing experiments that didn't cause huge explosions.

Banned by the great banhammer of thor.

given that dg has only a certain number of possible items and that the customization menu allows you to keep three presets with their individual color values when applicable thus proving the limitations aren't as low as we are led to think they are ("it's too time consuming and/or impossible to convert existing items to custom menu" + few months later = "hey buy our keepsake keys" + a few more months later = "hey we turned rare card collectibles into custom items despite the fact that we didn't do this earlier with any of our other items not released from solomon but you can't have them without paying") i don't think it'd be like, a huge dedication to allow three specific full gear loadouts per person, especially when many people hate certain types of combat anyway Imo the logic thing to do would be firstly allow 1 bind per slot per type of item. Eg Weapon you are allowed 6 binds - staff, wand, bow, knife, 2h and 1h Shield you are allowed 6 binds - 3*shield (each class) + 3* offhands etc. Plus have 5 slots into which items you can't use go (so you can bind like primals or w/e without killing off ur usable binds) Then have the 3 sets and make it so each set can only use binds from 1 class (melee, mage or range) and have however many slots, 5 seems ok BUT the first slot is like a specialised 'hands' block that can take a 2h OR a 1h and an off-hand. Plus give them a ring assignment slot. Then on the ring of kinship right-click toggles have 3 options (melee, range, mage) with only 2 visible subject to what ur on and can't toggle mid-combat. Boom dw vs 2h not a bind issue and the swapping thing made useful. most damage in dg comes from attacks your armor can't block, and enemies who are higher than your level in terms of damage output does having a helmet+gloves+boots really make much of a difference there? yet there's no reason to actually HAVE those items made, and for the most part, it's wasted content you can either just have those gears be never used, or you can make a system where they are used alternate idea: offhand items can have their own bind slot like ammo Offhand items having their own bind slot makes the most sense.

Needs a drawbridge. And maybe sharks with fricken lazer beams attached to their fricken heads.

Banned for trying to light the elemental lighthouses.

Sounds to me like the easiest solution is make it so off-hand binds don't count towards your active bind.

*hits Alg and BtMF with one epic smack* *kicks Alg in the shin for not hitting, slapping, glomping, trackling etc. BtMF in your last post*

What cards did you end up with? Or at least what noteable ones?

Today is april 1rst.

This. Don't expect any advice from us RPG. Our advice is to get out of that situation. You want to stay in.

Banned for being quoted.