April 9, 200719 yr Everyone knows this is a nice feature helpful to new members of a forum. The problem is, pictures are way too small. Some guides contain pictures full of them, and they're hard to read, clicking on the small picture every 20 seconds. Maybe here at TIF we can have an image-hosting site that allows users to post pictures in the "Add image to post" feature with actual size pictures.
April 9, 200719 yr Then use one of the other millions of free image hosts, you have have to use the one tipit say so. Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12
April 9, 200719 yr I have thought about this too, i love the adding image to the post but i don't use it because it is not the actual size, if it was possible then i would use it a lot more. [spoiler=My 99s (7)]9,638th to 99 Fletching ~ 29th January 2007 737th to 99 Hunter ~ 2nd July 2007910th to 99 Agility ~ 28th January 200859,467th to 99 Defence ~ 23rd December 200992,762nd to 99 Hitpoints ~ 26th June 2010102,704th to 99 Attack ~ 29th June 2010144,091st to 99 Strength ~ 29th June 2010
April 9, 200719 yr It displays actual size if your picture is not too large. Sorry I have no data on what the limits are (filesize or widthxheight?), but I have had pics show full size. ;-) it's a lot easier to get over yourself when you look at intelligence the same way you look at beauty, or height, or eye color: being smart is easy, but being good is hard ... being smart is handed to you, being good is handed to *nobody*.
April 9, 200719 yr Author Then use one of the other millions of free image hosts, you have have to use the one tipit say so.I do. :| I'm sure if pictures arn't too big they'd show. ftwImageshackftw doesn't have a thumbnail feature if the picture is small enough. :wink:
April 10, 200719 yr Imageshack doesn't have a thumbnail feature if the picture is small enough. :wink:If the picture is small enough to not need a thumbnail then it will work fine on this forum? Why is that a bad thing? Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12
April 11, 200719 yr Author Imageshack doesn't have a thumbnail feature if the picture is small enough. :wink:If the picture is small enough to not need a thumbnail then it will work fine on this forum? Why is that a bad thing?This thread is about the *Add image to post portion when you post a reply. :roll: Not imageshack.
April 11, 200719 yr Don't use the rolley eyes smilie with me, I was replying to a message that YOU posted. :shame: Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12
April 11, 200719 yr He may have, but you de-railed the thread. Anywho... :P Maybe there should be a 640x480 size limit (basically large enough for a full RS Java Applet screenshot), or something like that? I don't know what the size limits are either. :? However, it sounds to me like the size control needs to be on the Tip.It Server, and not on the external host, with a built-in script that would go client-side to maintain the image box. This would have it first showing in small size, but with a "click to enlarge" option that would dynamically show the larger image. As a note of comparison, this already exists in the IPB 2.x.x forums, but I always thought it was something that PhpBB should have, even if only to compete with things that people would have to pay a [bleep]-load for. This might result in PhpBB getting more users, which would get it more criticism, which would then get the problem of missing features fixed, which would then make it grow more. :) Just my $15 of mental thoughts. :wink: ~Mr. Devnull and normally with a cool mind.(Warning: This user can be VERY confusing to some people... And talks in 3rd person for the timebeing due to how insane they are... Sometimes even to themself.)
April 12, 200719 yr The problem is, pictures are way too small. Some guides contain pictures full of them, and they're hard to read, clicking on the small picture every 20 seconds. Hard to read???? Have you ever read a guide that has 20 or so pictures written by a person who has absolutely no idea how to crop an image? When you have to scroll side to side to read every line and then up and down to read the entire post , THEN its hard to read. I like to fart silently but deadly in movie theatersArd Choille says (11:41 PM):I wouldn't dare tell you what to do m'dear
April 14, 200719 yr Author Hah, that gave me a good chuckle, Albosky. I know what you mean. :-X I'm saying, if there's a picture with text, the words are so, ugh, small? I'm sure you know what I mean. :wall:
April 27, 200719 yr I agree. When everything's been said and done, more has been said than done.All skills 80+
April 27, 200719 yr Hah, that gave me a good chuckle, Albosky. I know what you mean. :-X I'm saying, if there's a picture with text, the words are so, ugh, small? I'm sure you know what I mean. :wall: That's because the poster does not know how to handle pics. Seriously, uploading on Imageshack or other free uploading services is dead easy, if only people would try it. Twitter ||| Google+ ||| Facebook ||| LinkedIn ||| My very interesting weblog about science
Create an account or sign in to comment