Jump to content

Jesus christ (excuse me).


Mountdoom77

Recommended Posts

I don't know if you've ever heard of the game fl0w but i just saw the trailer and went "I uhhh what uh misflamoppershwcween" (you can understand i was pretty speechless at how unusually boring and well unusual it was) so i went on IGN to see what rating it got. A 7.6! For the love of roman noodles what were they smoking? They'll give Spider-Man 3 a 6.0, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a 5.2 (or whatever), etc. (a mediocore score) but you'll give some game where all you do is eat stuff to grow a freaking 7.6 (you're an amoeba or some kind of wormy jellyfish :|) and yes believe that's all you do. IGN has got their heads so far up their [wagon] it's not even funny (this goes for all the other poor rating sites).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if you've ever heard of the game fl0w but i just saw the trailer and went "I uhhh what uh misflamoppershwcween" (you can understand i was pretty speechless at how unusually boring and well unusual it was) so i went on IGN to see what rating it got. A 7.6! For the love of roman noodles what were they smoking? They'll give Spider-Man 3 a 6.0, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a 5.2 (or whatever), etc. (a mediocore score) but you'll give some game where all you do is eat stuff to grow a freaking 7.6 (you're an amoeba or some kind of wormy jellyfish :|) and yes believe that's all you do. IGN has got their heads so far up their [wagon] it's not even funny (this goes for all the other poor rating sites).

 

 

 

Just because all you do is "eat stuff" does not mean the game is bad. There are a lot more to ratings than gameplay. What about graphics, Sound, Presentation, or how well the game was designed?

 

 

 

Seriously, it's like your smoking something because of your obviously a movie video game fanboy. First a thread saying they get a bad rap then a whole thread saying how your beloved movie games got lower scores.

goldenblade995.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On G4, X play gave it a 4 out of 5 and anyway i thought it was kinda fun. I mean it may look stupid at first but it is really good. Anyway dont trust IGN...the people on there are just normal people giving there opinions, not professional game reviewers.

hatsune-miku-wallpaper-49-1.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if you've ever heard of the game fl0w but i just saw the trailer and went "I uhhh what uh misflamoppershwcween" (you can understand i was pretty speechless at how unusually boring and well unusual it was) so i went on IGN to see what rating it got. A 7.6! For the love of roman noodles what were they smoking? They'll give Spider-Man 3 a 6.0, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a 5.2 (or whatever), etc. (a mediocore score) but you'll give some game where all you do is eat stuff to grow a freaking 7.6 (you're an amoeba or some kind of wormy jellyfish :|) and yes believe that's all you do. IGN has got their heads so far up their [wagon] it's not even funny (this goes for all the other poor rating sites).

 

 

 

Just because all you do is "eat stuff" does not mean the game is bad. There are a lot more to ratings than gameplay. What about graphics, Sound, Presentation, or how well the game was designed?

 

 

 

Seriously, it's like your smoking something because of your obviously a movie video game fanboy. First a thread saying they get a bad rap then a whole thread saying how your beloved movie games got lower scores.

 

 

 

Ok dude calm down. The whole bad rap thread was just giving my OPINIONS on movie-based games.

 

 

 

I just saw the trailer and it looked a little bland.

 

 

 

EDIT: Look at all the other people posting, they're not flaming me but their just saying it was a decent game. Next time do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you even played the game?

 

 

 

Just because the game isn't "omg look at those graphics" doesn't mean it's a bad game.

 

 

 

Exactly. I've never heard of the game though. Just wanted to look because of the title.

 

 

 

Change the title. It's misleading.

I dont need a siggy no moar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if you've ever heard of the game fl0w but i just saw the trailer and went "I uhhh what uh misflamoppershwcween" (you can understand i was pretty speechless at how unusually boring and well unusual it was) so i went on IGN to see what rating it got. A 7.6! For the love of roman noodles what were they smoking? They'll give Spider-Man 3 a 6.0, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a 5.2 (or whatever), etc. (a mediocore score) but you'll give some game where all you do is eat stuff to grow a freaking 7.6 (you're an amoeba or some kind of wormy jellyfish :|) and yes believe that's all you do. IGN has got their heads so far up their [wagon] it's not even funny (this goes for all the other poor rating sites).

 

 

 

Just because all you do is "eat stuff" does not mean the game is bad. There are a lot more to ratings than gameplay. What about graphics, Sound, Presentation, or how well the game was designed?

 

 

 

Seriously, it's like your smoking something because of your obviously a movie video game fanboy. First a thread saying they get a bad rap then a whole thread saying how your beloved movie games got lower scores.

 

 

 

Yes, there is more to a game than how it looks.

 

 

 

If a game is rubbish, cant it still get a good rating if it has good graphics etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One factor is uniqueness, what makes a PoTC: At world's end video game unique? Nothing. Lord of the rings for gamecube/ps2? Just another hack and slash.

 

 

 

I wouldn't discredit IGN just based on 1 'funny' review, sure fl0w is a cheap flash game and 7.6 is pretty much just a dumb rating, but IGN has very reliable other reviews, background info etc...

 

 

 

People want 'funny' stuff even if it isn't high quality, just for the sake of novelty. :) And after all, fl0w costs like what... $8? It's like one of those 3mb games on Steam, something to take a bit 'less seriously' (not that you should take games very seriously anyways, haha)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ive never heard of fl0w but arguing against large media ratings can not lead to anything good. Im sure you could find plenty of great games that got crappy scores, or vice versa. Its all about opinion, and people don't always agree with the general public. thats what makes us different. If i said i hated Halo (i don't but just as an example), thousands of people would flame me and try to change me. but honestly, being hated isn't going to change the games i like. If i said i loved shadow the hedgehog (i hated it but thats beside the point) there are still thousands of die hard sonic fans that would flame me. no matter what your oppinion is, someone will always disagree. sometimes, more disagree with you than in other circumstances, but thats life. get used to it.

 

 

 

wow that was a long rant about nothing :XD:

Quote

 

Quote

Anyone who likes tacos is incapable of logic.

Anyone who likes logic is incapable of tacos.

 

PSA: SaqPrets is an Estonian Dude

Steam: NippleBeardTM

Origin: Brand_New_iPwn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if you've ever heard of the game fl0w but i just saw the trailer and went "I uhhh what uh misflamoppershwcween" (you can understand i was pretty speechless at how unusually boring and well unusual it was) so i went on IGN to see what rating it got. A 7.6! For the love of roman noodles what were they smoking? They'll give Spider-Man 3 a 6.0, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a 5.2 (or whatever), etc. (a mediocore score) but you'll give some game where all you do is eat stuff to grow a freaking 7.6 (you're an amoeba or some kind of wormy jellyfish :|) and yes believe that's all you do. IGN has got their heads so far up their [wagon] it's not even funny (this goes for all the other poor rating sites).

 

 

 

Many things go into rating games. Graphics, sound, playability, concept, etc. etc.

 

 

 

If you're going to trash a game, at least know your stuff. :notalk:

I don't run races to see who's the fastest, I run to see who has the most guts. -Pre

thewho2.jpg

Currently the best beat out there:

Minuit jacuzzi (DatA Remix) - TEPR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.