Yeah, but since then the argument has devolved to a point where you two are just shouting at each other.

Or Rocco getting angry with dusty while he gives reasoned arguments.

 

Rocco: [bleep] [cabbage] I hate you [bleep] [bleep] I'm teh prnZ0r! [bleep] z0mg! I actully left some people there in my [bleep] [bleep] imagination!

Dusty: Actully (page, link) you didn't. your argument isn't very good.

Sorry, by shouting, I meant stating the same points over and over again.

I think that's the basis of all arguments.

Yeah, but since then the argument has devolved to a point where you two are just shouting at each other.

Or Rocco getting angry with dusty while he gives reasoned arguments.

 

Rocco: [bleep] [cabbage] I hate you [bleep] [bleep] I'm a donkey [bleep] z0mg! I actully left some people there in my [bleep] [bleep] imagination!

Dusty: Actully (page, link) you didn't. your argument isn't very good.

 

Hex.... Seriously... SHUSH...

 

He has people in there, and to Dusty, you probably have, but I might of missed it, can you give the evidence to Rocco saying he moved out all his troops?

Sorry, by shouting, I meant stating the same points over and over again.

I think that's the basis of all arguments.

But generally, this type of argument doesn't go on for like, 3 pages now?

(Also, lol at Hex blindly supporting you)

1) I thought my post was quite impartial, but whatever.

2) Dusty, that's what your arguments consist of. I try to be fluid and react to the other person when I'm arguing a point, you just state your point over and over as though you've got a sledgehammer instead of a brain.

3) Hex, the irony right now is hilarious. You misunderstood Rocco, not him Dusty.

Yeah, but since then the argument has devolved to a point where you two are just shouting at each other.

Or Rocco getting angry with dusty while he gives reasoned arguments.

 

Rocco: [bleep] [cabbage] I hate you [bleep] [bleep] I'm a donkey [bleep] z0mg! I actully left some people there in my [bleep] [bleep] imagination!

Dusty: Actully (page, link) you didn't. your argument isn't very good.

 

Hex.... Seriously... SHUSH...

 

He has people in there, and to Dusty, you probably have, but I might of missed it, can you give the evidence to Rocco saying he moved out all his troops?

That's a good question.

 

Can I just say all of my people were moved to Harakkis? I'd rather play this game completely interstellar rather than sit and wait for 40 years before I have enough manpower to do stuff in space. And it's not godmodding, because it doesn't give me a significant advantage.

 

And Killerwatt, first page :thumbup:

 

And since the only person to oppose an insta-move was Doom, and three others are for it, I see no reason why I can't go for it. So there, all 250 million Nigerian citizens have been relocated to Harakkis and Uthiah.

 

Tip.it was down all yesterday and today :'(

 

Ion research continues. I've decided that my full population of 260million-ish has now reached Harakkis. Some have taken private shuttles to Uthiah.

 

The base on Ogrekus has expanded further.

 

I'm back in the NWO.

^The first two show the intent (which was not to leave 10% of the population, idk where you got that from Dungeonal), the third one is when the moving was done.

 

2) Dusty, that's what your arguments consist of. I try to be fluid and react to the other person when I'm arguing a point, you just state your point over and over as though you've got a sledgehammer instead of a brain.

What else can you do when an opponent refuses to acknowledge the evidence right under his nose? Also, nice job with the personal attack :)

Yeah, but since then the argument has devolved to a point where you two are just shouting at each other.

Or Rocco getting angry with dusty while he gives reasoned arguments.

 

Rocco: [bleep] [cabbage] I hate you [bleep] [bleep] I'm a donkey [bleep] z0mg! I actully left some people there in my [bleep] [bleep] imagination!

Dusty: Actully (page, link) you didn't. your argument isn't very good.

 

Hex.... Seriously... SHUSH...

 

He has people in there, and to Dusty, you probably have, but I might of missed it, can you give the evidence to Rocco saying he moved out all his troops?

That's a good question.

 

Can I just say all of my people were moved to Harakkis? I'd rather play this game completely interstellar rather than sit and wait for 40 years before I have enough manpower to do stuff in space. And it's not godmodding, because it doesn't give me a significant advantage.

 

And Killerwatt, first page :thumbup:

 

And since the only person to oppose an insta-move was Doom, and three others are for it, I see no reason why I can't go for it. So there, all 250 million Nigerian citizens have been relocated to Harakkis and Uthiah.

 

Tip.it was down all yesterday and today :'(

 

Ion research continues. I've decided that my full population of 260million-ish has now reached Harakkis. Some have taken private shuttles to Uthiah.

 

The base on Ogrekus has expanded further.

 

I'm back in the NWO.

 

 

Its still a act of war though, but yeah, Rocco you seemingly have left it a ghost town

1) I thought my post was quite impartial, but whatever.

This post? this isn't impartial.

2) Dusty, that's what your arguments consist of. I try to be fluid and react to the other person when I'm arguing a point, you just state your point over and over as though you've got a sledgehammer instead of a brain.

Getting confused with Rocco

3) Hex, the irony right now is hilarious. You misunderstood Rocco, not him Dusty.

Yeh, I know that your not laughing in real life, your just typing away with a straight face. there is no irony, it seems irony is the new "I know you are but what am I"

Its still a act of war though, but yeah, Rocco you seemingly have left it a ghost town

Not really. I never attacked anyone, and no troops moved in. He completely abandoned Nigeria, yet still wants to keep it? Why? That doesn't make any sense.

 

Way way way before that I said my government would be lead in Nigeria.

You said it would be your capital. So...a capital with nobody in it?

1) I thought my post was quite impartial, but whatever.

This post? this isn't impartial.

 

No, not this post. The one I made on this subject yesterday.

 

2) Dusty, that's what your arguments consist of. I try to be fluid and react to the other person when I'm arguing a point, you just state your point over and over as though you've got a sledgehammer instead of a brain.

Getting confused with Rocco

 

No, I meant Dusty, in the 'argument/discussion' we had yesterday, he was just saying the same thing over and over.

 

3) Hex, the irony right now is hilarious. You misunderstood Rocco, not him Dusty.

Yeh, I know that your not laughing in real life, your just typing away with a straight face. there is no irony, it seems irony is the new "I know you are but what am I"

 

Hex, screw you. I was laughing. It is ironic. Of course you don't understand it, that's the whole point. You were saying Rocco couldn't/hadn't/whatever read the "12 word sentence" but the whole point was that Rocco DID respond to the entirety of the sentence with "Says who?" by asking WHO said none of his population was there, as he did not consider himself to have said it.

 

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

Its still a act of war though, but yeah, Rocco you seemingly have left it a ghost town

Not really. I never attacked anyone, and no troops moved in. He completely abandoned Nigeria, yet still wants to keep it? Why? That doesn't make any sense.

 

 

Hmmm actually I'm starting to see where your coming from, and Rocco if you moved your entire population out, but kept government in, you just left high officials open

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

The only time I can recall him saying that was yesterday, after all of this started.

 

I left them there because in the original thread we had been discussing a no-weapons treaty for the earth when we got to space, so I kept them there so they would be safe.

Maybe in the NWO IRC.

[hide]

1) I thought my post was quite impartial, but whatever.

This post? this isn't impartial.

 

No, not this post. The one I made on this subject yesterday.

 

2) Dusty, that's what your arguments consist of. I try to be fluid and react to the other person when I'm arguing a point, you just state your point over and over as though you've got a sledgehammer instead of a brain.

Getting confused with Rocco

 

No, I meant Dusty, in the 'argument/discussion' we had yesterday, he was just saying the same thing over and over.

 

3) Hex, the irony right now is hilarious. You misunderstood Rocco, not him Dusty.

Yeh, I know that your not laughing in real life, your just typing away with a straight face. there is no irony, it seems irony is the new "I know you are but what am I"

Hex, screw you. I was laughing. It is ironic. Of course you don't understand it, that's the whole point. You were saying Rocco couldn't/hadn't/whatever read the "12 word sentence" but the whole point was that Rocco DID respond to the entirety of the sentence with "Says who?" by asking WHO said none of his population was there, as he did not consider himself to have said it.

 

He responded BUT didn't understand the sentence.

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

So..... if most of his people were away dusty can almost walk in and eradicate the barneys?

 

Its still a act of war though, but yeah, Rocco you seemingly have left it a ghost town

Not really. I never attacked anyone, and no troops moved in. He completely abandoned Nigeria, yet still wants to keep it? Why? That doesn't make any sense.

 

Hmmm actually I'm starting to see where your coming from, and Rocco if you moved your entire population out, but kept government in, you just left high officials open

not..... very.... clever....Rocco....

[/hide]

Is there a way to search through all of my posts?

If there is can you tell me? I just had to go through the entire thread pretty much :?

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

The only time I can recall him saying that was yesterday, after all of this started.

 

I left them there because in the original thread we had been discussing a no-weapons treaty for the earth when we got to space, so I kept them there so they would be safe.

Maybe in the NWO IRC.

No, actually I believe either you, Doom, or Ross made a pretty lengthy post about it in the original thread.

Does that sound like me? Haha. Probably Doom, that tree hugging hippie.

Since you guys have been arguing for like... What is it now? ...twenty pages, why don't we vote on it?

 

I believe Dusty should have it(not only because he saved me but Rocco isn't even a wee bit reasonable now, he even uses posts where he stated he both left and stayed as his defence).

So..... if most of his people were away dusty can almost walk in and eradicate the barneys?

 

Don't you realise this is what you've been arguing for?

 

Yes, Rocco did understand the sentence.

 

That earth no-weapons treaty was just some random [cabbage] in #NWO.

 

And Dusty, it was near the start of this thread iirc.

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

The only time I can recall him saying that was yesterday, after all of this started.

 

I left them there because in the original thread we had been discussing a no-weapons treaty for the earth when we got to space, so I kept them there so they would be safe.

Maybe in the NWO IRC.

No, actually I believe either you, Doom, or Ross made a pretty lengthy post about it in the original thread.

Does that sound like me? Haha. Probably Doom, that tree hugging hippie.

Actually I was against it. I feel like people can do whatever they want war wise. If someone wants to try to take over the entire earth, go ahead.

I abandoned the neutral Earth idea after like a week, so no worries on that front.

Is there a way to search through all of my posts?

If there is can you tell me? I just had to go through the entire thread pretty much :?

Since you guys have been arguing for like... What is it now? ...twenty pages, why don't we vote on it?

 

I believe Dusty should have it(not only because he saved me but Rocco isn't even a wee bit reasonable now, he even uses posts where he stated he both left and stayed as his defence).

That doesn't make any sense. We vote to see who gets my land? No. We'll come to an agreement ourselves.

 

Me and Dusty will continue this over PM to avoid further spamification.

 

And anymore contributions from posters toooo!

Yes, Rocco did understand the sentence.

Incorrect.

But yeah, as Dusty has shown, he did say it - 3 times. I mean, yeah Rocco did say he was keeping officials there about 3 weeks ago but.. 3 times? I guess he thought it was a negligible technicality, which it is, and Dusty has now jumped on it. But yeah, whatever.

The only time I can recall him saying that was yesterday, after all of this started.

 

I left them there because in the original thread we had been discussing a no-weapons treaty for the earth when we got to space, so I kept them there so they would be safe.

Maybe in the NWO IRC.

No, actually I believe either you, Doom, or Ross made a pretty lengthy post about it in the original thread.

Does that sound like me? Haha. Probably Doom, that tree hugging hippie.

Found my post, page 300!

 

Posted 10 October 2009 - 06:45 PM

My Earth land will be uninhabited in about 25 years, the only people who love there will be government officials who run the Empire in a deep underground bunker, just south of *transmission ends*

 

So, these 200 or so people take up the 32nd largest country on Earth?

 

How about this, just pick a spot where they can govern from. Either in Nigeria or somewhere else, it doesn't really matter. Saying you're holding that much land with so little people (who are underground in a bunker no less) is ridiculous.

 

edit: Whoops, didn't see that you wanted this over PM. *hides this post*

 

Oh and I just [bleep]ed up my monitor majorly somehow. Damnit.

Yes, Rocco did understand the sentence.

Incorrect.

Actually, I did.

You clearly didn't, he said "you gave away most your defences when you put your people away on the earth" but you appeared to read it as "you gave away most of your defences"

 

stop arguing over petty things now rocco.

Yes, Rocco did understand the sentence.

Incorrect.

 

Prove it.

 

I gave the evidence for why he did, you prove why he didn't.

Yes, Rocco did understand the sentence.

Incorrect.

Actually, I did.

You clearly didn't, he said "you gave away most your defences when you put your people away on the earth" but you appeared to read it as "you gave away most of your defences"

 

stop arguing over petty things now rocco.

 

 

Hex... this isnt a "petty" thing... It's a very large piece of land, something you don't know about