There is no point arguing about what you cannot prove/disprove... unless you happen to have a photo....

There's tons of evidence for a higher power or diety that created and drives the universe...but this is getting off the topic of the OP so ill let it be for now \

 

actually there isnt. there isnt a single thing that religion explains that science doesnt

 

 

 

 

 

ontopic: its runescape. take noone seriously. take nothing seriously

 

 

 

 

 

Of course the Big Bang is true. Nothing exploded and here we all are.

 

 

 

Flaming is an intrinsic part of the internet, however we may feel about it.

Honestly, just don't ask touchy questions that could be considered offensive (in idiotic ways, but still offensive) by religious people. Religion and stuff are touchy matters, and we should just respect them and leave them alone.

Honestly, just don't ask touchy questions that could be considered offensive (in idiotic ways, but still offensive) by religious people. Religion and stuff are touchy matters, and we should just respect them and leave them alone.

 

 

 

Thing is I like asking question a lot, I wouldn't mind getting flamed after asking for evidence like the OP did. It would just re-inforce my opinion on the matter.

 

 

 

Religions are indeed touchy matters, seems you can't discuss them rationally.

Honestly, just don't ask touchy questions that could be considered offensive (in idiotic ways, but still offensive) by religious people. Religion and stuff are touchy matters, and we should just respect them and leave them alone.

 

 

 

Thing is I like asking question a lot, I wouldn't mind getting flamed after asking for evidence like the OP did. It would just re-inforce my opinion on the matter.

 

 

 

Religions are indeed touchy matters, seems you can't discuss them rationally.

 

 

 

Err...yeah, because there's no rational evidence that there IS a god, (wait-read the second part before you flame me) but on the other hand, theres' no rational evidence that there ISN'T a god either.

Yep very well put. No flaming needed. From my point of view, all religions are either big hoaxes, some stories that got "twisted" by time or entirely genuine. Since I'm an atheist, I'd mostly think they are the first and second option.

Yep very well put. No flaming needed. From my point of view, all religions are either big hoaxes, some stories that got "twisted" by time or entirely genuine. Since I'm an atheist, I'd mostly think they are the first and second option.

 

 

 

I'm a freetinker myself. I honestly don't know whether there IS a god or not, but honestly, there is no evidence to support either side.

 

 

 

How did genes and stuff got programmed in the first place? How did life come about? What sparked off the "big bang"?

 

 

 

These questions are still some of the greatest mysteries in science probably. But it still doesn't support the religious people, because there is no evidence that god DID do all these things.

Yep very well put. No flaming needed. From my point of view, all religions are either big hoaxes, some stories that got "twisted" by time or entirely genuine. Since I'm an atheist, I'd mostly think they are the first and second option.

 

 

 

I'm a freetinker myself. I honestly don't know whether there IS a god or not, but honestly, there is no evidence to support either side.

 

 

 

How did genes and stuff got programmed in the first place? How did life come about? What sparked off the "big bang"?

 

 

 

These questions are still some of the greatest mysteries in science probably. But it still doesn't support the religious people, because there is no evidence that god DID do all these things.

 

 

 

Thats because it was Buddah, duh :roll:

 

 

 

I myself believe in whatever i see for myself or has been proven to be correct... God hasn't in any way benefitted me during my life so I in turn do not believe in him ( don't say god's gift to me was living -.- )

 

 

 

But i agree with Local... The OP did kind've instigate the argument by putting out an argument that neither side could win, but still argue over.

But i agree with Local... The OP did kind've instigate the argument by putting out an argument that neither side could win, but still argue over.

 

 

 

I could argue that the preacher was opening himself to criticism by voicing his opinion then.

But i agree with Local... The OP did kind've instigate the argument by putting out an argument that neither side could win, but still argue over.

 

 

 

I could argue that the preacher was opening himself to criticism by voicing his opinion then.

 

 

 

You open yourself to criticism by waking up in the morning. Everything we do is criticised by one person or another, it's if you choose to care that changes things.

epic graph

 

 

 

http://graphjam.com/2009/08/06/song-cha ... -religion/

Never start an argument with someone about the three following subjects:

 

1. Religion

 

2. Religion vs. Science

 

3. Politics

 

 

 

You're life will be a hell of a lot easier if you stay clear of those 3, trust me.

There is no point arguing about what you cannot prove/disprove... unless you happen to have a photo....

 

 

 

There is no point arguing about what you cannot prove/disprove... unless you happen to have a photo....

 

 

 

 

Heh, but since you can edit any photo, I guess you can get anyone to believe anything, right? :lol:

Never start an argument with someone about the three following subjects:

 

1. Religion

 

2. Religion vs. Science

 

3. Politics

 

 

 

You're life will be a hell of a lot easier if you stay clear of those 3, trust me.

 

 

 

Yeah, true. These are all very touchy topics, which people will immediately switch into "flame mode" if they're proved wrong and can't reply adequately.