December 18, 200916 yr Link to the declaration:http://forum.tip.it/topic/248608-hp-declares-on-eternitypor/ (not the 1e post but some reply's down on the page)Winning clan (both name + initials):Eternity [E]Winning clan's member-list:http://forum.tip.it/topic/248608-hp-declares-on-eternitypor/Losing clan (both name + initials):Hussaria Polska [HP]Losing clan's member-list:http://runehead.com/clans/ml.php?clan=husariaStarting/ending ops of both clans (screenshot is valid proof): Eternity: Hussaria Polska: Story; Eternity was massing and Hp was showing up. I looked again too the declaring topic and their was 21:00 gmt+1, but i'm sure i arranged 20:00 gmt+1 , so after asking hp why they weren't their he said it was over 2 hour( so 22:00 gmt+1)(20:04:47) <Shinn> u guys coming?(20:06:56) <Kosciej13> today?(20:07:05) <Kosciej13> 2hours(20:07:07) <Kosciej13> leftSo after having some fun in world 141 and losing members because they gonna out too the pub etc. Hp was offering a matched +-2 instead of the orginial rule 25 vs 25 rule.(20:26:35) <Kosciej13> matched +2 ... say yes or no, in 35minsso we accepted that on 21:00 gmt+1 and the war was started.we pulled 20 and they pulled 27, they cutted too 22 and the war was starting.Now the problem; The rules will be the same only it was gonna be a matched +-2. instead of bringing 3 rangers they had 8+ rangers AND 1 person that isn't in HP. screens of proof: Ranger #1 + person that isn't in Hp.(22:00:49) <@Shinn> .clan worek xd(22:00:56) -[ZZ]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Worek Xd was not found in the RSHSC. Ranger #2: Ranger #3: Ranger #4: Ranger #5: Ranger #6: Ranger #7: Ranger #8: Ranger #9: 6 rangers on 1 picture: - Hope too see that the tip.it staff is gonna take action about rule breaking, Cya. I do it because I can. I can because I want to. I want to because you said I couldn't.
December 18, 200916 yr "Ranger #1 + person that isn't in Hp.(22:00:49) <@Shinn> .clan worek xd(22:00:56) -[ZZ]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Worek Xd was not found in the RSHSC. "First of all, have you ever heard about "display name change"? He changed it today from 0lollol0 ... sth sth to Worek xD. "Hp was offering a matched +-2 instead of the orginial rule 25 vs 25 rule. "I would not call it "offer" but addicting to more fair fight for your team. Think about 25 vs 20 with 3 rangers and todays fight. Imo, first option is worse. "Hope too see that the tip.it staff is gonna take action about rule breaking, Cya." We agreed to make you happier so nothing will be done. And to resum all up - you are crying about some points after loosing not able to win fight. <!-- m -->http://kosciej13.[ReferralLinksNotAllowed].com/<!-- m -->
December 18, 200916 yr IMO ET can claim autowin IF ET can proof about the max 3 rangers rule.read the declare topic than ;)
December 18, 200916 yr Author "Hp was offering a matched +-2 instead of the orginial rule 25 vs 25 rule. "I would not call it "offer" but addicting to more fair fight for your team. Think about 25 vs 20 with 3 rangers and todays fight. Imo, first option is worse. then ok, if we didn't agree that is was a 25 vs 20, and u still had 9 rangers? on 1 time rangen. I do it because I can. I can because I want to. I want to because you said I couldn't.
December 18, 200916 yr Worek xD was last known as O_lol_O_O, and he is on your memberlist. HP will not be docked points for multiclanners. Furthermore, you broke the ranger cap significantly, nearly tripling the amount of rangers you should have brought. Considering a rule broken like this would've been severe enough to change the flow of combat, unless you can prove that you agreed to remove/change the cap, the win will go to Eternity,
December 18, 200916 yr lol, we changed rules from 25 ppl cap to +/- 2 matched to make it more fair and now u r claming autowin, sad... eat these points!!!
December 18, 200916 yr Guys i didn't suppose you can be so arrogant. I offered you matched +2 because your leader Shein didn't want to come for beggining rules. So we can say that we set rules 1hour before the war. And there was nothing about rangers. You were much worse than we and you want auto-win LOL. Not respect for rivals. We should cut 3 ppl but we cut 8 of them... <!-- m -->http://kosciej13.[ReferralLinksNotAllowed].com/<!-- m -->
December 18, 200916 yr Guys i didn't suppose you can be so arrogant. I offered you matched +2 because your leader Shein didn't want to come for beggining rules. So we can say that we set rules 1hour before the war. And there was nothing about rangers. You were much worse than we and you want auto-win LOL. Not respect for rivals. We should cut 3 ppl but we cut 8 of them...There was disagreement about the time, no wonder we pull less, so stop complaining about that fact.
December 18, 200916 yr Lol disagreement because of your fault ! LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your leader even didn't want to war us in appropriate time so I had to change rules!!!!!! And now you want points. Funny, poor clan. Ending: And you still think you could win this? I did everything to fight you today and you;re blaming us. No more respect. <!-- m -->http://kosciej13.[ReferralLinksNotAllowed].com/<!-- m -->
December 18, 200916 yr Lol disagreement because of your fault ! LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your leader even didn't want to war us in appropriate time so I had to change rules!!!!!! And now you want points. Funny, poor clan. Ending: And you still think you could win this? I did everything to fight you today and you;re blaming us. No more respect.just realise it doesnt matter for the aim of this topic. Whether we would have won or not does not affect the outcome of this.Anyway, I'll distance myself from this topic, let tip.it moderators decide whether its right or not. last comment:with that lot of rangers your clan will win anyway. I just wonder what it will be when there is a 3 ranger cap. That could give a whole different outcome. Guess we will never know now.... greetings,MJB15
December 18, 200916 yr And think what would you do if it was 25 vs 20 not 22vs20 You've been totally dominated - nothing to hide. Koes from 20ppl... I'm also wondering why are you so desperate about these points. You have been even searching for ppl which are not on our ML hah^^ And don't lie you've favorably accepted fighting at 9pm gmt+1 cause it was in rules... I written 10pm bye mistake which I corrected later. You've only showed things which are comfortable to you, why havent you showed that you dont want to come? <!-- m -->http://kosciej13.[ReferralLinksNotAllowed].com/<!-- m -->
December 19, 200916 yr Gratz HP, good luck getting the TWR "win" and points Eternity. Crimson Raiders Forums | Crimson Raiders Runehead | Crimson Raiders FA Runehead§ Crimson Raiders Veteran | Ex Downfall Warlord | Ex Team Vendetta Council
December 19, 200916 yr Gratz HP. dido E Ex Legendz Warlord - Proud DV Warlord- Ex SE Member - New Threat FADon's LastWordsFor twr - Click HereDont look if you cant handle the truth.
December 19, 200916 yr Favorite topic of the day :thumbup: 3 Years Strong<3 PM TheHitman|Will in #downfall at swiftirc if your interested in a fight against Downfall Clan
December 19, 200916 yr HP to cheat? humm.......... I don't know why they would but I hope it's false info lol :unsure: Sigma NU MOST Anticipated but still underrated Silent Ember
December 19, 200916 yr Time was a mistake, but the rules like sniper cap, range cap didn't change so you broke the rules with atleast 4 rangers because you had like 7 of them.And worek xD he wasn't on the ML and wouldn't change the outcome if he wasn't in the fight but the rangers that's just a rule what you guys broke. Sorry for claiming an autowin but we want just fights with rules and if you break rules we claim. I hope the Moderaters do their job good. Cya on the battlefield.
December 19, 200916 yr I smell beef. GL Eternity on getting your "win" ~@Gaz~%Runescape Elites - Advanced Elite ~ January 24th 2010 - Present~@Clan Europe - Co-Leader ~ December 27th 2009 - Present~@Team Rock - Official ~ May 25th 2009 - Present
Create an account or sign in to comment