Which is more respected? Total Levels or Total XP

[Tomale]

Who should be more respected?

 

 

 

1. Player with 1500 Total Lvls, 17,000,000 XP

 

2. Player with 900 Total Lvls, 20,000,000 XP

[tijgerforce]

should be person 2

 

Is person with highest CB

[moose585]

I would say that i would respect both of them.... i bow to their prowess :wink:

[HatshepsutLecter]

i personally think that they should both be respected equally. (yeah, i know the chickens way out.)

 

 

 

the person that has the higher total lvl has shown that he is good in a variety of things in the game. the person that has the higher xp shows that he has the dedication to stick to the things he like and make them great.

 

 

 

hmm, now that i think of it maybe the person that has the higher ltotal vl should be more respected. he has shown that he can do a wide variety of things and the person that has the hight xp lvl has shown that they can stand in the same spot in the game and click a lot.....

 

 

 

ok, now im confused. :P

[lavirylime]

Player 2, because player 1 is obviously a member. Member skill totals 1200~1500 are a dime a dozen unless they have tens of millions of total exp.

[Hobgoblin11]

Number 2, easily.

 

 

 

Everybody knows that as you pgress through the levels, it gets harder to level up, therefore this person clearly would have a few skills at a high level. Number 2

[Killerate]

Well player 2 has technically done alot more effort than player 1. But I find alot of people don't pay attention to experience. They think levels count more because you appear higher up in the hiscores.

 

 

 

Player 2, because player 1 is obviously a member.

 

 

 

Not necessarily I see alot of pures on p2p that have 80+ range and mage so they can use ancients etc. But you're right members tend to have less exp at a certain level than f2p's, but that's simple maths they have more skills so in most cases there experience is spread out more.

[lavirylime]

But I find alot of people don't pay attention to experience. They think levels count more because you appear higher up in the hiscores.

 

Jagex puts priority on skill total over total exp because they want people to subscribe to members for an easier, higher skill total.

 

 

 

Not necessarily I see alot of pures on p2p that have 80+ range and mage so they can use ancients etc. But you're right members tend to have less exp at a certain level than f2p's, but that's simple maths they have more skills so in most cases there experience is spread out more.

 

Enlighten me how it's possible to achieve over 1000 skill total on f2p with only 3 mil total exp, let alone 1500. Either way, the maximum skill total on f2p is 1492, so the example player 1 is definitely a member.

 

 

 

I don't mean to be condescending or anything, but with the given examples, "not necessarily" is simply outruled.

[das_masta238]

i personally think that the highscore board should be based experience wise. I think that people that play the game to get 500mil experience should get higher status than people that have level total or [x] amiount and 300mil exp

[Hobgoblin11]

But I find alot of people don't pay attention to experience. They think levels count more because you appear higher up in the hiscores.

 

Jagex puts priority on skill total over total exp because they want people to subscribe to members for an easier, higher skill total.

 

 

 

Not necessarily I see alot of pures on p2p that have 80+ range and mage so they can use ancients etc. But you're right members tend to have less exp at a certain level than f2p's, but that's simple maths they have more skills so in most cases there experience is spread out more.

 

Enlighten me how it's possible to achieve over 1000 skill total on f2p with only 3 mil total exp, let alone 1500. Either way, the maximum skill total on f2p is 1492, so the example player 1 is definitely a member.

 

 

 

I don't mean to be condescending or anything, but with the given examples, "not necessarily" is simply outruled.

 

 

 

True. The maximum skill total you can have if you have 3,000,000 XP or under in F2P is a total level of 708. For P2P it is 1166, so actually the initial post is also wrong.

 

 

 

The minimum XP you can hit a total level of 1500 at is at roughly 13,310,074 XP. This complies with the initial post.

[Golden_Glory]

Totally number 2. People with more xp have put more effort into their character than someone with high levels and low total exp.

[NY_Vice]

 

 

 

True. The maximum skill total you can have if you have 3,000,000 XP or under in F2P is a total level of 708. For P2P it is 1166, so actually the initial post is also wrong.

 

 

 

The minimum XP you can hit a total level of 1500 at is at roughly 13,310,074 XP. This complies with the initial post.

 

 

 

ugh i dont know about the p2p stuff, but the f2p is DEFINATELY wrong. One of my accounts is f2p, has about 2mil xp, and has 697 total level. I could easily get 12 levels without needing 1 mil xp...

 

did u just pull that numba out yo @$$? :^o

[EYOWAREYA]

Varies from person to person depending on what skills take up the majority of their xp.

 

 

 

Getting fletching or cooking xp would be easier than getting herblore, slayer, runecrafting xp.

[Hobgoblin11]

LMAO! No, I didnt pull that figure out of any of my various orrifices, I shall have you know!

 

 

 

My bad though, that figure is wrong. The error cam when I counted the number of F2P skills there are. I was lazy and looked at how many skill guides Tip.It have, which I took as 12. I forgot that the guides grouped together combat as just one skill. The actual number of F2P skills is 15.

 

 

 

So, I took 3,000,000 XP, divided it by the number of skills available to find the XP in each skill for an equal share of Xp. Then, looking at the XP table of tip.it main site, I found the nearest number of XP, and rounded down. Then, taking the corresponding level, multiplied that by the number of F2P skills available.

 

 

 

Therefore, the correct figure is 840. Thanks for pointing out my error.

[NY_Vice]

LMAO! No, I didnt pull that figure out of any of my various orrifices, I shall have you know!

 

 

 

My bad though, that figure is wrong. The error cam when I counted the number of F2P skills there are. I was lazy and looked at how many skill guides Tip.It have, which I took as 12. I forgot that the guides grouped together combat as just one skill. The actual number of F2P skills is 15.

 

 

 

So, I took 3,000,000 XP, divided it by the number of skills available to find the XP in each skill for an equal share of Xp. Then, looking at the XP table of tip.it main site, I found the nearest number of XP, and rounded down. Then, taking the corresponding level, multiplied that by the number of F2P skills available.

 

 

 

Therefore, the correct figure is 840. Thanks for pointing out my error.

 

 

 

lol np :P

[Tomale]

Apologies on my initial numbers. No calculations were made to get those numbers. They were purely hypothetical. :-w

[Screechingmu]

Who should be more respected?

 

 

 

1. Player with 1500 Total Lvls, 3,000,000 XP

 

 

 

I would be really hard pressed to find someone with that high total level and that low xp :shock:

[Holymyth]

Who cares about total XP - it does nothing for you. Skill total is useful and I think is more needed, unless the total xp winner has 99's

[Screechingmu]

 

 

 

So yea, i would be more impressed with the second one... :-w

[tefda]

Well this will sound kind of lame but in the book Siddhartha by Herman Hesse which follows along with the story of the Buddha has us learning that to truly be enlightened you must experience things, being enlightened cannot be taught and therefore you need to be out there to experience and learn for yourself, no man or woman can give it to you, you must give it to yourself.

 

 

 

That's basically why I think the first person with the higher skill total is the better person. They've experienced a vast majority of the game and seen all the facets that the game has. They're the one's that could answer a question you ask of them, the second one only has a limited range or knowledge and advice he can dispense whereas the first has seen so much that he is a fountain of knowledge.

 

 

 

The first one is my choice. Why play the game when you only get to experience part of it? Isn't that why most people joined members, to get a bigger piece of the picture that is Runescape?

[Risen_The]

 

 

 

So yea, i would be more impressed with the second one... :-w

 

 

 

Insane. I'm only 1 total lvl more than him and I only have 36m exp... :oops:

[blackscorpion]

Number 2, easily.

 

 

 

Everybody knows that as you pgress through the levels, it gets harder to level up, therefore this person clearly would have a few skills at a high level. Number 2

 

 

 

How higher your skill level, how easier to get xp.

 

Someone with a high xp total can only focus on the easiest skill, while the other train also skills not so easy to lvl : ie herblore, agility , runecrafting.

 

Combat is easy to train and you get exp for att,def or str + hp exp.

 

I have more respect for the person with a high skill total then for a high exp or cb lvl.

 

I see regulary people with cb 120 + lower ranked and less exp then me.

 

I for myself have cb 114 + total skill 1882

[Hobgoblin11]

The first one is my choice. Why play the game when you only get to experience part of it? Isn't that why most people joined members, to get a bigger piece of the picture that is Runescape?

 

 

 

I understand what you are saying, but that wasn't the question. The question was which deserves the greater respect, not which you would rather have.

[Shadow93]

#2, quality > quantity

[fallen_snipa]

100% agree with shadow its better quality than quantity