9/11 Commision LIES

The governments official story of what happened on 9/11 is full of holes. The 9/11 Commission Report ignores or changes facts which interfere with this theory, and is a blatant example of how far the government will go to cover up incompetence or purposeful negligence or at worst, planning and execution.

I suggest anyone who wishes to be an informed individual reads the 9/11 Commission Report, and the excellent book by David Ray Griffin entitled The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions, from which this information is distilled.

Here are some of the worst errors.

 

 

 

1. The omission of evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

Way too many conspiracies floating arond... :wall: :wall: :wall:

Gotta love another piece a crap that's meant to make a person money. God bless capitalism!

Way too many conspiracies floating arond... frustrated frustrated frustrated

 

 

 

Wait a minute here, I haven't presented any alternate theories, I've just shown how the government conspiracy theory is false. Please read the topic before posting a response, as is the norm in internet communities?

 

 

 

Gotta love another piece a crap that's meant to make a person money. God bless capitalism!

Yeah, a college professor of theology and philosophy of religion writing a book that alienates him from his colleaugues and ruins his future career prospects is really in it for the money. Ace observation.

 

 

 

 

Gotta love another piece a crap that's meant to make a person money. God bless capitalism!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, a college professor of theology and philosophy of religion writing a book that alienates him from his colleaugues and ruins his future career prospects is really in it for the money. Ace observation.

Yup. That sounds just about right. It's just amazing what people do for money, eh? eh?

Wait a sec, whats a conspiracy then? And what would this be?

PS- Quoting is done like this"

[quote name="Errdoth"]->Insert Quote Here<-[/quote]

11. The omission of Larry Silverstein's statement that he and the fire department commander decided to "pull" Building 7 (28).

Fail. He deliberately confessed to it in or around 2003. Not to mention, they hadn't ignored it, they had just throughout it far stretched. In 2003 however, they had to eat crow.

He never admitted to it until 2003, I think it was 2003, or around that.

Wait a sec, whats a conspiracy then?

Just google it.

Fail. He deliberately confessed to it. Not to mention, they hadn't ignored it, they had just throughout it out stretched. In 2003 however, they had to eat crow.

What?

Silversteins statement is completely at odds with the governments official version, and my point is, the 9/11 commision didn't report on this at all.

So I don't fail, I win.

 

Wait a sec, whats a conspiracy then?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just google it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fail. He deliberately confessed to it. Not to mention, they hadn't ignored it, they had just throughout it out stretched. In 2003 however, they had to eat crow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silversteins statement is completely at odds with the governments official version, and I believe he deliberately "Confessed" to it as well, to confuse people away from the truth.

No, I know what a conspiracy is, I just want to know what you'd call this

A conspiracy theory is a theory that claims an event or series of events is the result of secret manipulations by two or more individuals or an organization, rather than the result of a single perpetrator or natural occurrence.

The US government claimed that Osama Bin Laden masterminded the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the US authorities failed to stop him. This is a conspiracy theory.

The 9/11 commision is so factually challenged that it hardly supports this theory, though it tries extremely hard. It got rid of or changed facts that didn't fit. The 9/11 commision report is full of lies.

And Grim_Jokes, are you actually going to respond to my post? I would like very much to hear your opinion or any facts you can think of which might be relevant.

The 9/11 commision is so factually challenged that it hardly supports this theory, though it tries extremely hard. It got rid of or changed facts that didn't fit. The 9/11 commision report is full of lies.

That is not a consparicy theory, it is proven fact.

A consparicy theory is the book you are citing, and you would be considered a consparicy theorist by large. That usually carries a negative implication.

That is not a consparicy theory, it is proven fact.

Wait, I just posted a list of factual errors in the government document which tried to fully explain how 9/11 happened and who did it, and all you can say is "But, my theory is a proven fact."

Please learn to read books and research topics for yourself instead of repeating the party line. Baah?

A consparicy theory is the book you are citing, and you would be considered a consparicy theorist by large. That usually carries a negative implication.

Please read the definition of conspiracy theory. And learn how to spell conspiracy, maybe, and kill two birds with one proverbial stone.

 

That is not a consparicy theory, it is proven fact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wait, I just posted a list of factual errors in the government document which tried to fully explain how 9/11 happened and who did it, and all you can say is "But, my theory is a proven fact."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please learn to read books and research topics for yourself instead of repeating the party line. Baah?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A consparicy theory is the book you are citing, and you would be considered a consparicy theorist by large. That usually carries a negative implication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please read the definition of conspiracy theory.

No, I said that the US government having knowledge of it is a proven fact. They have records. Osama bin laden being responsible is also a proven fact.

Please, go back to intelligence school where you learn that one source does not fit all. And also ask the teachers about attacking the argument, not the poster. You do know attacking the poster is a sign of a lost argument, dont you?

I am also curious as to why this man, and only this man, found these so called "facts". If these facts were truly correct, and not blown out of proportion, than the other intelligent minds would react. However, I didnt see any other books come out on this, and Liberals never complained to bush about this. Am I missing something, or were the liberals just abducted by aliens from osama bin laden :roll:?

Dont be rude :roll:.

Another person saying 9/11 was a conspiracy. I love these types of threads. If this really was a conspiracy and they killed thousands of people do you think they would let the truth get out? No, the author would be disposed of.

Another person saying 9/11 was a conspiracy. I love these types of threads. If this really was a conspiracy and they killed thousands of people do you think they would let the truth get out?

I haven't exposed the truth; all I have done is exposed some lies. I do not know what happened on 9/11, and neither do you. The lies of the government I have exposed are many, and you have responded to none of them.

It's not unlike a government to allow or stimulate events which bring the public around to supporting a war. For example, Pearl Harbour was largely preventable, we had already cracked the Japanese code and we had destroyed a Japanese midget submarine earlier the same day. Also, the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was passed after a completely fictional attack on the US navy by the north Viatnamese. Finally, in the 60's, the Pentagon planned a fake terrorist attack against the US to incite war with cuba. (read more, and more)

No, the author would be disposed of./quote]

Oh, and the moon landing was fake because David Ray Griffin said so. It was filmed in hollywood. I have exactly one [1] source from an unknown, shunned author that proves this.

Yeah.. The government lied about 9/11 to kill thousands of it's own tax paying citizens. Along with those people went millions of dollars in buildings and many important papers/documents.. Yes, the government did this. [/sarcasm]

Go be paranoid somewhere else :roll:

Oh, and the moon landing was fake because David Ray Griffin said so. It was filmed in hollywood. I have exactly one [1] source from an unknown, shunned author that proves this.

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

http://v911t.org/

Weird 9/11 Facts:

~George Bush Sr. was meeting with Osama Bin Ladens brother on 9/11.

~WTC building seven was demolished, not knocked down by an aircraft.

~Some of the hijackers are still alive.

~There were numerous wargames/exercises planned on/near 9/11 by the US government.

~The universal failure of the US aviation authorities, the pentagons air defense system, and the US intelligence service, all happened at the same time.

~Most Bush administration officials were involved heavily in firms (Bechtel, Haliburton, etc..) that profited heavily from US policy changes after 9/11.

~The Bush Administration was planning a war in the Middle East way before 9/11, and even before Bush was elected. (google PNAC iraq justification for more info)

Sources for Alternative 9/11 Information:

http://911proof.com/6.html

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?sto ... 1155307646

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1990669218

http://69.28.73.17/911ontrial.doc/cdt911.html

http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortu ... -alive.htm

http://www.guerrillanews.com/

http://www.narconews.com/

http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml

Yeah.. The government lied about 9/11 to kill thousands of it's own tax paying citizens. Along with those people went millions of dollars in buildings and many important papers/documents.. Yes, the government did this. [/sarcasm]

Yes, it was worth it to Bush, heavily involved in supplying huge corporations with no-bid contracts, and Cheney, who recieved millions from Haliburton in a much more obvious spree of war-profiteering.

Have you ever heard of Bechtel? The Aqaba pipeline? and most importantly the Project for the New American Century? You may be sarcastic, but you are right.

Yeah, a college professor of theology and philosophy of religion writing a book that alienates him from his colleaugues and ruins his future career prospects is really in it for the money. Ace observation.

Wait...why is a professor of theology writing a book about American government? Seems rather odd.

 

Oh, and the moon landing was fake because David Ray Griffin said so. It was filmed in hollywood. I have exactly one [1] source from an unknown, shunned author that proves this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

 

 

 

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

 

 

 

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

 

 

 

http://v911t.org/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hmm... i dont recgonize the name of any of those sites. Mabye because they are not credible? I didnt mean any sources, I meant credible sources. I could go out and write a website about aliens and that could be my source. But its absolutely not credible, unless its a widely recgonized party. Those sites do not house widely recgonized parties.

 

 

Oh, and the moon landing was fake because David Ray Griffin said so. It was filmed in hollywood. I have exactly one [1] source from an unknown, shunned author that proves this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

 

 

 

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

 

 

 

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

 

 

 

http://v911t.org/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hmm... i dont recgonize the name of any of those sites. Mabye because they are not credible?

I'd have to say they're not credible. I saw something on the news once about how easy it is the make a website/video look professional and get people to believe it's real. *points at links*

Hmm... i dont recgonize the name of any of those sites. Mabye because they are not credible?

Maybe because you haven't looked at them yet. Youre poorly thought out and obviously slap-dash posts are beggining to take a toll on your own mental fortitude. If you don't trust a coalition of college professors long enough to read what they have to say, I think you need to rethink your attitude.

I'd have to say they're not credible. I saw something on the news once about how easy it is the make a website/video look professional and get people to believe it's real. *points at links*

Good job reading the content before responding. Excellent work on accusing the websites of being fake because the look real. And finally, congratulations on contributing absolutely nothing to this thread except an example of how skepticism of obvious facts can go on within America.

Wait...why is a professor of theology writing a book about American government? Seems rather odd.

He is one of the only people with the desire to educate people about what is going on in their country, it's rather hard work, you see. People don't like it when their expectations of government and reality don't fit.

 

Hmm... i dont recgonize the name of any of those sites. Mabye because they are not credible?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe because you haven't looked at them yet. You're poorly thought out and obviously slap-dash posts are beggining to take a toll on your own mental fortitude. If you don't trust a coalition of college professors long enough to read what they have to say, I think you need to rethink your attitude.

 

 

 

Credible college professors would not use the ending -.com

Its a widely known fact that Education Sites, as well as official sites, do not use a -com. ending. Those sources are most likely and widely used to collect profits and generate page hits, not supply reliable information.

Wow, I think this guy is bent on his theory. I dont think hes ever gona give up...

 

 

 

Credible college professors would not use the ending -.com

Is it possible the government controls who gets the .edu address ending and they don't want the scholars for truth getting one?

None of this is the point. I posted those websites on request, because you wanted more information. The point here is the 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT AND THE LIES CONTAINED IN IT

It is extremely telling that nobody can actually respond to the facts I have posted proving the official government report wrong, and only titter about details.

Pault.. I don't know who brainwashed you, but everyone around here is proving to be smarter than college professors. A conspiracy is just a bunch of paranoid people brainwashing others while making up a story that seems reasonable. SNAP OUT OF IT! Don't fall under their power unless you want to waste your life like them.