ROFL, E, I had to! They made me do it!!! :wink: hmm... i win. but after reading responses to my post, i'm not sure i should have; in skipping all the intermediate posts in the thread and having not been on the forums for awhile, i didn't realize people were looking for the editors with a malicious intent. my bad -.- (i love the new emoticons!) surely i'm not the only old-schooler around that knew that though? :? besides, Eeeeediot was before the controversial article(-s?). I'm personally certain that Eeeeediot DID NOT write the article that was removed. In fact, it appears they had an editor change-up before then. :-k And BTW, SenorTamale, not everyone here has a bad intent. In full fact, maybe 15% (maximum, not minimum) of the people in this thread have a bad intent, at the worst. Personally, I'd like to think that there are a lesser percentage. :) ~Mr. Devnull