compfreak847

SARCASM ALERT SARCASM ALERT I never said I was always right, nor that people shouldn't argue with me. I'm far from always right, and I certainly wouldn't want people to stop arguing with me. Just give me a real argument, not a personal flamewar.

A few hundred FTP players on the forums indeed won't increase server costs that much. 250,000 FTP players on the forums will. SQL queries and database searching, to say nothing of storage and archiving, all take up a considerable amount of processing power.

Mage cape is perfect IMO, I really like it. I don't see the point in wasting programming time for something that's just a matter of opinion. Look at the summoning cape, too complex and we end up with glitches that have to be resolved.

You will, but it'll be rather slow and dangerous. I wouldn't advise it.

Not a chance. You'll be lucky to get 3-4 kills, especially with only a terrorbird. You really need higher stats or you'll never hit him and get owned by the minions.

But the fact that they are a company, formed to make money, does. Not sure without knowing their market data. Perhaps they were convincing players that members stuff wasn't all that great, or was removing some of the mystery. I'm not making a big deal about it, just a single post saying I don't like the direction Jagex is moving. The rest of my posts were backing up and proving every part of that first post. I don't need to prove profit is being lost, all I need to prove is that expensive are increasing. And since servers, maintenance, electricity, bandwidth, and man power are not free, I've already proven it.

We're all waiting with bated breath. Could you either stop spamming or contribute something productive before I report your posts? That's not their fault. XP rates have stayed almost precisely the same for combat since the day the Abyssal Whip came out.

Not when your ripping out the accurate, never-missing 48s only slightly slower then the 24s from a MSB.

Yes, I'm aware this is sarcasm Prove it. Let's see your task rates for each hour, and we'll talk. And you don't? I'll laugh when I see the grave over your manly-but-dead corpse. I train in PVP worlds, and I don't want to get KOed by a PKer like this guy: [hide=][/hide] Already added. In the 800 hours for maxed including summoning, it works out to 3 XP per hour - within statistica variance for my numbers anyway, so it doesn't matter. I got 8 hilts from bandos not on slayer. That proves nothing. Nice lie, they don't even drop them :roll: Did a cat jump on your keyboard or something? w00t the big 5k! Here's to another 5k productive posts, TIF!

Copy and paste it into word :-# ATTENTION: THIS IS THE FINAL POST BEFORE I HIT THE BIG 5,000. I PLAN TO GET IT ON THIS THREAD. SOMEONE PLEASE POST SOMETHING UNINTENTIONALLY STUPID SO I CAN GET IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

I included charms in my calculations. A month certainly isn't going to be enough to offset the thousands of hours of zarfot\ydraisel\qeltar\my testing, your going to need far more then that before challenging the numbers :P

*ahem* *Points to signature*. Should round it out at an even 20 later this evening, 1 more demon trip and I've got the charms for 96 summoning.

Exactly what I said. Instead of going to R&D for an update, it's going to pay for server costs for some FTPer who hasn't paid a dime.

Oh, the irony. Since I responded to all the visible text, all you have to do is point out where the invisible text I didn't respond to was. Easy enough :P I looked really hard, but I still couldn't see any invisible text. Could you show me where you did it also? Thanks, you too.

Because it isn't. See pages 100-1,950 for discussion of the rates. If you have a problem with what me, ydraisel, Queltar, and Zarfot worked out, feel free to show where. What are you trying to prove? If you want to train the most efficient way you'll train with Slayer as getting 99 Slayer with 99 Attack, Strength and Defence is faster than getting 99 Attack, Strength and Defence, and then get 99 Slayer afterwards. If you want to find the best possible melee xp/hr it's obviously not going to be Slayer as, nomatter what the skill, the fastest way to train it loses money. But who needs 99 slayer? Amen, brother Well, now we're moving up. I think that argument was covered in the 3rd or 4th page. Pretty soon he'll be arguing about things settled in page 8 \ 10-19.5 :P I was referring to text volume, not forum pages. I think the forum pages were around 7-49 :)

Not at all, it was simply an add on to the original post. I believe that a person has a right to raise children if he or she wants to, and that right should not be deprived of them. Yep. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/conten ... order=page Here's a source. Where's yours? Those smarter people ARE us. Just because your in the top 70% of the population doesn't mean you suddenly don't want to take out the garbage. Sure, find out what part adoption violates. Then compare that with letting them die. Your welcome to marry who you want. If your both average intelligence, you'll have children. If your far below average, you'll adopt. That simple. It wasn't an argument against you, it was an argument against your unreadable sentance. Since you seem to have dropped it, I'll respond to this argument instead. Allowing couples to save childrens lives instead of letting them die sounds like a fair idea to me. I'm not quite sure what radding wikis are, but I'm not forcing nature to move in the direction I want - it's in the direction of more intelligent. Are we smarter then single celled protozoa? If so, then intelligence is the direction we've been moving throughout the course of nature :roll: Nowdays? Nope. Thankfully, my idea doesn't affect that in any way. Not any more, or we would be below apes on the pecking order. Yes, christian. Thankfully, I'm covering all three areas at once - by saving dying children via adoption, I'm far outstripping the 'violations' of having parents children be non-hereditary. Yeah, I did. Could you quote a source on that? I don't remember adoption being a part of the holocaust. I stated the facts. It's his fault if he takes offense to them.

I responded to every line of your post. Unless you had some size 1 text that I missed, every part of it was refuted. Too late, I'm already fully grown. Sooner or later you'll have to learn that just because someone proves you wrong doesn't give you a free pass to laughably absurd flaming :roll:

Yep Nope That was an add on to another post, therefore it was not spam. Every word of it was true and stated in a non-insulting manner, therefore it was not flaming.

Not a chance. With any luck I'll be able to stretch this into a week \ Every single company comes out and says whatever will make them look best. This isn't rocket science. No, because FTP is designed to hook people into members. Making an initial fee required would reduce good reviews and new player influx. Because my money is being spent to support freeloaders instead of giving me updates, and I don't like that. I stated my point maturely and without flaming, and have continued to do so throughout the course of of this thread. I have conclusively proven every word of my original post, and my statement that I don't like my money being given to free players stands. Because my money is paying for it. They most certainly can use it how they wish, as I mentioned round about my third post. And by the same token, I can comment on how they use it. Ah yes, what was the title of this forum again? I believe it was something about runescape discussion? I already said that they are still delivering my money's worth, but that's no reason to begin throwing fistfuls of it to freeloaders. Again, what's the name of this forum? I believe it had something to do with 'discussion', not 'agree with the OP or shut up'. I enjoy debating, and your welcome to either argue with me or ignore, but you sure as heck aren't going to order me off this thread. Just don't click on this thread! Even if you don't agree with us, you don't have to read it :ohnoes:

Because it isn't. See pages 100-1,950 for discussion of the rates. If you have a problem with what me, ydraisel, Queltar, and Zarfot worked out, feel free to show where.

Or else your just an immature jerk who refuses to accept that some people enjoy different things then him. I didn't even use sarcasm, for that matter. Learn to see beyond the end of your nose. See above. Yes, because I didn't listen to you and suddenly being not-enjoying sarcasm, your 'point' was proven. Grow up. You: It's 20% Me: (math stuff done): Actually, it's .54%... You: Yeah well... I just made it up! It's intuition! Me; Yeah, well... it's still wrong You: I can't argue with that but I gotta think of something so... Your reading skills suck! Me: Uhh.. Could you respond to my post? You: Your reading skills suck! Me: ... I just gave you the numbers to prove it wrong, do I need to go over them again? You: Your reading skills suck! Me: ... You: Your reading skills suck!

What a joke. Complete bunk perpetrated by uninformed idiots who see something happen once and immediately think it's some sort of secret, complex pattern. That's even worse then the 'faster IP' castle wars people.

They can still read forums without PTP. And do you really think RSOF Is more mature then tif or any of the other free fansites? Covered that in the first post, the sole point of FTP is to get people to become members.

I don't know many people too stupid to know how to adopt, but those people are welcome to live their lives without children if they so desire.

Separate banking times, don't include rare drops as the rate will be factored in later, and ensure your timing and XP are exact down to the last decimal place. Record outfit, inventory, prayers\pots used, how often each are used, the location used in monsters with multiple areas, and any results affected by competition be thrown out. Oh, and it's going to required hundreds or thousands of hours of testing to upset the results of me, ydraisel, qeltar, and (to some extent) Zarfot. Good luck.