Alg

Say there's a small town hiding a mage from you. The "Stupid Evil" villain would butcher the entire town personally and maybe kill the mage in the process. A smarter villain would perhaps set the town against the mage, or force the mage to reveal him or herself, and then kill him or her. Actually want to play an evil mage character now... :razz:

Woo

Getting 80 dungeoneering in a couple of hours or so. The dungeons themselves have been trolling me all day.

Gorgonite Plate and Promethium Longsword. Ammo is 125 cosmics, and I would have had a surgebox but my runecrafting level is too low.

Yes it was :thumbup:

Added

I need your voices! Vote here http://forum.tip.it/topic/285485-wildernessfree-trade-poll-expanded/#entry4689485

If the Wilderness/Free Trade Referendum had more options, would your vote have been the same? Now's your chance to actually vote that way. Post too, if you want. There are other topics about it here, and I'm really just making this thread for the poll. This section gets more traffic than Questionnaires, and I'm betting that would make the result more accurate.

Yaay fishing!

And now for something that's hopefully interesting. "Mask" is the name I've been using because it's meaningful. Especially here on the internet, where we all hide behind a persona that's entirely different from our actual selves. However, we do this in reality too. Think about how you behave with others, especially if you have several personas for several groups. Now think about your internet persona. Now think about your actual beliefs, thought processes, et cetera. Which are the most similar? For many people, the result seems to be that their internet persona more closely follows their actual beliefs. So, when plunged into a world of faceless strangers, is the mask that we've all had to create our actual selves? When, then, do we wear the mask, in face to face conversation, or behind out online identities? I seem to have lost my train of thought there. If I remember the rest, I'll post it. Hopefully that was coherent and at least somewhat interesting. It's not a story about romance, but it'll have to do. That said, I know that there's a low-level pure with the RuneScape name "Mask" and I do wish he'd either start playing again or give up the name.

Pfft. NCIS.

Truer words haven't been spoken. That's the one prejudice I'm trying to break. As you can probably tell, not going so well. I think I'm done here. Getting too worked up, going to leave before I break something else :razz:

Glad to contribute.

Robin Hood. It started out so well. Then it got so boring that I left. Waste of an hour an a half, and what makes it hurt so much is that it could have been epic.

All I ask is for the self awareness to realize that. :shades:

Tetris is better than CoD: Black Ops. I don't care about the 20 year and vast genre differences. Personal opinion also means nothing. Also you smell funny. Yeah. Especially console "debates". People spend so much time arguing about them that you have to wonder whether or not they've actually had time to play the games they're plugging.

...I'm not good at arguing, I just pretend to be :razz:

Yes. Religion is a delusion, and so is rationality or even delusions. Everything is a delusion :) And for some reason it's okay to disrespect one delusion but not another. It's somehow absurd to think that the religious man's delusion is less a delusion than Weapon's, here. I'm not religious. Didn't think I'd have to point that out again but everyone seems to think I am. Weapon's post - both versions - exemplifies what I hate about antitheists. Namely, the belief that their beliefs are untouchable but anyone else's are worthy of mockery.

You mean you're surprised that laws written for a desert-dwelling culture thousands of years ago are going to conflict with your modern Australian morals? Or, you know, the fact that the Bible isn't limited to Leviticus and Exodus? Every time someone brings up that dissonance, they always quote from Leviticus. No context, historical or literary, is necessary, if course... </sarcasm> I do hate arguing with antitheists. It's like atheism's answer to religious zealots.

wat You could accept the teachings of Christ (Or broader, the tenets of a religion) without accepting the belief behind it. You probably also have atheists/agnostics that are part of a religious group as well, in the same way. It isn't an all-or-nothing issue. Reasons may include the sense of community or the fact that even without faith the religion still offers a philosophy.

<MI> @Everyone - You see the sky turn red, as crimson lightning arcs between the darkened clouds and the ground. The earth beneath your feet shakes violently as cracks begin to appear everywhere. The screams of the lost and damned can be heard and their disembodied forms can be seen whirling in the sky. Breaks in the clouds lead to pillars of energy carving the ground asunder. People are panicking Ohsh- 0 Crafting - 30 0 Archery - 76 0 Thievery - 55 Inventory: Iron Dagger Iron Arrows Ghostwood Shortbow Half-carved piece of wood A book

I doubt it. :/ I suppose we could do a field trip sort of thing, but I really doubt it. That's why I was looking at CSU Monterey Bay for biology. You can see the ocean from the campus :razz:

It could really go either way, I think. Depends on the people themselves. People seem to forget that for every WBC or Al-Quaeda member there are an unbelievably huge amount of people that aren't nuts. Or that it isn't a "this or that" option. You could have people that consider themselves Christian and accept scientific explanations, like you could have atheists/agnostics that reject the evidence for something without question. Personally, I don't care either way. What other people believe isn't important... Until they start bashing others for it.

Fair enough.

What about baby mice?