Zierro

Queens of the Stone Age - Go With the Flow RHCP - Scar Tissue

I can make a positive assertion without hardcore proof so long as I have any reasonable support at all? No matter what way you want to look at it, "God does not exist" is a positive assertion just like "God does exist". That means there is a burden of proof on you for making the assertion - you can't say that theists must give hardcore proof to backup the claim that God does exist when you don't give hardcore proof to backup your claim that he doesn't either. That's where hypocrisy would come into play. Two-way street. PS: I agree with Lent about the logical argument. It's almost a cop-out of a real debate. Sure it's effective but when all you do is rely on logical fallacies to back up your points, things get really boring around here. It's lack of creativity. Blah.

Then if you expect the same, why would you call yourself a hypocrite in the first place? You're saying that it doesn't apply to you yet you're defending yourself as if it does. :lol: We were talking about a hypothetical scenario in which an atheist who claims that God does not exist (positive assertion) hides behind the burden of proof argument when a theist makes the claim that God does exist. All in all that is a form of hypocrisy. If you do not fit this hypothetical description then what are you sweating about? It brings up the fact that she can exist, and nothing more.

Chances are if she says she loves you, she's fine with kissing you. Make lots of eye contact so you'll have more room for opportunity. When the moment feels right, move your face close to her's and if she doesn't have an uncomfortable expression on her face then you're in the clear. There's honestly nothing to it.

You make it really obvious when you misspell words like "Runescape". -.-

70 is high until you reach it. Then 80 is the next best thing... until you reach that. Then 90 is high until you get there and only have 99's to look up to. It's actually quite funny. :lol:

Not going to bother responding to your other comments as you misinterpreted what I said. As for this one, I don't hate you....I just think you're an idiot, and I'm a co-founder of the I-think-Zierro's-an-idiot Club. I'm an idiot for not responding to every post made on here? You'd think you'd make a better troll by now, but your attempts of trying to harass me (yes I still remember those PM's you sent me) just keep becoming more and more pathetic. This is the internet, kid! Get a life pl0x!!

There were a whole lot less people back then than there are now. Is that supposed to be a pro-vegetarian argument or is it my misunderstanding?

There's literally no proof for or against God's existence which is why I think the burden of proof argument is so silly when applied here.

"Made in Runescape"

If I agree with my own point, then I wouldn't have bothered responding to one that disagreed with it? Umm... says who? Yeah, except his which is why I had a rebuttal. Is that really so out of the ordinary? It seems much more normal than repeatedly posting "I agree" to practically every post on this thread. Look, if you have a problem with the way I post then that's fine. Join the I-hate-Zierro Club. It really doesn't bother me though. I'm gonna be here for a while and post however I want. ;)

What does this have to do with anything? I'm really getting tired of this... Can you show in any credible manner that I am indeed hypocritical or even unreasonable because I assert that god does not exist? It's only unreasonable if you ask theists for proof if they say "God does exist". After all, Saru was giving a hypothetical and Ginger said those type of people are hypocrites. If you are telling me that you fit that description then I'm sorry but I'm going to have to agree. PS: Didn't we talk about this exact thing before on here?

And this is not a two-way street because...?

But when you say it like that, it's saying it as if it has been confirmed... which means there is a burden of proof on you.

You kidding? Most gay guys have more female friends than male ones.

I really can't find anything to talk about with other girls. The only one I can have a meaningful conversation is my girlfriend, but that's expected.

Yes, it's very easy to spot the benefits of high Strength compared to Attack and Defence. [Ratio of successful hits] + [Ratio of 0's you take] V.S. [Max hit] Which side is easier to keep track of?

It's completely fine that you think it is nasty, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to do it.

I thought we already established the difference between believing something and claiming that it's an indisputable piece of information? If you're saying that they are the same thing, then how much weight does "God does/doesn't exist" by those standards? I don't see any flaming going on. Just debating our own opinions.

Combat Rings in POH's if you want to get technical.

Sorry Madman. I didn't know I had to reply to every single post. My bad! Seriously, what do you want me to do? Post "I agree" to every single one of them?

By that logic, nothing exists. We might as well say houses don't exist either.

Maybe you missed something here. (He means they say it as if it is an indisputable piece of information. They are giving a positive assertion.) (He means that people who think it is an indisputable piece of information are hypocrites because they have no proof for their assertion, yet their main argument is the burden of proof.) By this, you are saying that you're one of those people, and if you're not then why would you think this applies to you? I think it's just a misunderstanding of the term "not believing". If you ask me, in order to "not believe" you would have to make a 100% conscious decision. From the looks of things, I think that's what Saru and Ginger meant too.

You choose to believe something is wrong for no reason whatsoever? :?

Because you know as much as I do that God is just as impossible to prove as he is to disprove.