Zierro

I think there would be some exceptions to that rule though. 75 Slayer is much harder to get than 70 Firemaking.

How convenient for Christianity that the bible states it's perfect... even though it has to be the most contradictory pieces of work I have ever heard of. Tell me, which statement is more "infallible"? And try your hardest not to evade it this time: Thou shall not kill or thou shall kill gays?

Being surprised is better of course. Although, I do like knowing which skills are closer so I can purposely train them and get that level.

Castle Wars

"The law of God is perfect." By the way Sly, I knew you'd avoid trying to prove that Jesus is God's son. I made that call a long time ago. ;)

5 does not equal 2. Besides, why should I answer your questions when you won't answer mine? That's a double standard. I don't want to get too off topic. All I'm gonna say is that looks great on your credibility. :lol: The point is, I wouldn't accept it. Or else I would be Christian, ya know? My main point is that there is no proof. Yes. Once again, looking great on your credibility. You won't even let the trivial things slide past. You just disagree with everything I say no matter what it is. Wow, God makes laws for no reason? And you worship this guy? :) In case you haven't realized, I wasn't technically asking you to prove something. I'm just waiting for you to say you can't because there is no basis for your argument, but you have way too much pride to admit that. I love you too. There are also people who come to the conclusion that it's fallible, granted there are people who disagree with them, naturally. Yes, that's exactly what's happening. Go ahead and slap the label "infallible" on that book. I'll just wait until you put it down and slap "fallible" right over top of it. ;)

But no matter how you want to word it, you still made a mistake and won't apologize for it. Understand? You just never admit when you're wrong and never have. Hell, I bet you think it's still not morally wrong to lure someone in RS. :roll: You mean you concerted effort to evade any question directed towards you? OK. I'll copy and paste in case you missed it :mrgreen: : That was what kind of proof I was looking for. And why are you making the assumption that I'm going to accept it anyways? You already know I'm not. I'm just asking for it to show you how dumb it is, and you avoid answering because you know this. I have, quite a few times. You're the one evading it. ;) So you're saying God makes laws for no reason at all? Other way around, bud. You can't prove anything unless you have a basis to work off of. What's your basis? Essentially nothing but faith! And I'm the one purposely being obtuse? That's nice but you skipped the part about why it should even be considered "infallible" in the first place. You can't just slap the label "infallible" on something for no reason whatsoever. I can do the same exact thing: I am infallible and we are in disagreement, therefore you are wrong.

I don't think you get the point. Necro was saying it's pathetic to get addicted to weed. Venomai was saying that it happens, and it's not all that pathetic - just like being addicted to heroin isn't. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think he was talking about the junkies specifically. Just the idea of becoming addicted in the first place.

He's talking about the "pathetic" factor, though.

Okay. Let me talk in simplest terms so you can understand this: I saw your post which only had two responses. I quoted you. I had other tabs up so it took me a while to submit my response. Before I submitted, you edited in your other responses. But you made the assumption that I conveniently skipped over them, when in fact, I didn't even get the chance to. I have the right to ignore your responses if I want. You should know that - I see you do it more than anyone else on these forums. Oh so that doesn't count as arguing but saying you didn't apologize for your mistake does? Like I said, the proof that makes you yourself believe that God is his father. Is that better? Or are you still going to nitpick at it as a way to evade the question? Oh man, this is too good to be true! "Because the Bible says so." You're telling me that you're sticking with the bible through rain, sleet, and snow! :lol: Doesn't the bible clearly state that you're supposed to kill sinners? No, to say it is "good" evidence - and to believe it - is disingenuous. That would be the point I was trying to make by asking you to prove it. You're making the claim that I never asked you for your proof about Jesus being the son of God? Good lord... Who says the Bible is infallible? Man... who is fallible. :lol: And before you say that God was the one who said it... Who are the ones who said God said that? Man... who is fallible.

You had the words "high potential" before that, trying to equate it to alcohol and tobacco. Yes, there is a risk to it but not nowhere near as bad as the other two drugs.

ACTUALLY It stated in the quote that collage students that do it get 4k into their collage pay. OR something around that, can't really QUOTE quote it. That's only for college kids, and it's only tossing them a bone. Anyways, what I mean by it's pointless is that the work they make you do is bogus. I had to keep score of little kids' basketball games for 65 hours because I got caught with a bowl.

I hate - no... I loathe community service. Pointless labor sucks.

11211

N64 caused me to really get into video games. The first game we got for it was Cruising World. It was so fun unlocking all those cars. :D Oh and who can ever forget Ocarina of Time? Best gameplay ever.

I never got why Ollie was black even though Cleveland was white. :lol:

I'd just like to add this: -Talking snakes -Zombies with magical healing powers -Virgin mothers -Zoo arks -A few thousand-year-old universe Now are you really gonna sit there and tell me that those aren't outside the realm of reason?

Basically it's: V.S. :lol:

Our race would have ended a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time ago, my friend.

Like Quoi Tu said, they can be treated equal without being treated the same. Let's think of an example... If a woman has a pet dog and cat and loves them both the same, she will treat them both equally but differently. She will feed the cat catfood, the dog dogfood, give the cat cat-litter, take the dog outside for walks, give the cat catnip, and give the dog bones. She gives them both different treatments but they are both getting about the same amount of loving.

*Is done waiting* I like the part how you skipped saying you were the one who made the mistake which was my point. Instead, you try to avoid it by bringing something else up. I wasn't the one saying, "Good job skipping 4 out of 5 of my responses!" Yes it is. I'm asking you for the best proof you have available - the proof that makes you yourself believe that God is his father. Is it really that hard to understand? *Points to Homosexuality thread whenever someone asks for *one* reason why homosexuality is wrong* I should be the one to ask specifically for what I already know doesn't exist? If you haven't noticed, the question is a trap because we both know there is no good reason to believe that he is the son of God other than blind faith. You're trying to use the fact that there is no good evidence against me! :lol: Stop avoiding the question Sly. Flinging the burden of proof as usual. It's ironic how you demand everyone to prove their assertions, yet whenever asked to prove yours, you just find a way to evade it every time. Good luck on proving that it is inside the realm of reasoning. :D

F2P are wrong when stating they "deserve" more. P2P are wrong when making the assumption that all free players follow that ideal.

Disturbed - Prayer Metallica - Invisible Kid

Vincent? What the hell? It's Cait Sith all the way! \

Korn - Falling Away from Me