Zierro

Korn has lots of good stuff. I really like Blind, Make Me Bad, Falling Away from Me, and of course ADIDAS :lol: . My favorite thing about them is that their music style is unique.

Okay I decided I changed my mind with some of my goals. I'm not going to go for 20M Hunter Xp. I figured it would be more fun to gain levels rather than Xp. So now I'm going to be striving for 90 Slayer, 90 Prayer, and all 80 Skills. :mrgreen: -90 Defence -94 Hitpoints

Having a member wearing the coolest gear go in a F2P and tease them. 8-)

I heard you get physical withdrawals from not having caffeine though.

Why would I admit that there were two responses there when I only responded to one? Wouldn't it make things look better for me if I lied and said I only saw one? Honestly, I can't believe you're arguing about something as stupid as this. Oh wait... I forgot who I'm talking to. :lol: I didn't say that. I said give me the best you can possibly give me.. I thought you said you quit cause Jagex was stupid about Summoning? :lol: It's so funny how you run away right before it seems like you're about to answer "Is Jesus the son of God?" Perfect timing.

If you quote someone their edits don't magically appear unless you go back and refresh. You were an [wagon] and made and assumption that I skipped your posts. I guess I shouldn't expect so much from you though. :) Wouldn't surprise me based on all your other posts. ;) I said give you the best you got. That's not an answer? So the word "proof" is more strict when it comes to refuting religion than it is when refuting hearsay? Say what?!

Yes, they were in before I submitted but not before I quoted you. I have a few tabs open up right now so that's why it took so long to submit. Wow, you must have skipped a lot of posts. Or you could, instead of trying to avoid it. And I asked you to give me the best you got. Are you implying that your own proof is bogus? Hey, maybe we'll agree on something here!

The "edit status" only appears after someone posted after your post. For example, I edited this post, but the "edit status" isn't under my post cause no one posted yet... and the time stamp still remains the same. Two can play at this game though. Christianity has been "refuted" many many many times in this thread already. Give me the best you got. ;) This is exciting.

Accusing me of skipping your responses when you haven't even posted them yet. Why else? I'm saying that you haven't "refuted" anything, or else we could just say we "refuted" Christianity as a whole. Are you scared to attempt to prove that Jesus is his son or something? Don't worry. I would be too. :lol: Isn't it kind of funny how the main point is actually "faith"? Big oops on your part, eh?

As long as she doesn't start to like Venom or Death then there isn't a problem. :D

Ooo... Name-calling. The fool's way of letting you know he's wrong and he knows he's wrong. By the way, since you want to play the "There were only two responses" card, notice what my first two responses happen to be. There's what you quoted, and then there's a link which refutes the "Jesus didn't exist claim" (Although, I'd already refuted it earlier). Oops on your part, huh? :mrgreen: Very sly of you to weasel your way out of that apology I was waiting for. That is so unlike you. PS: Refute is such a strong word to use when you have Tryto "refuting" your "refutes". Judging by your credibility, I'm probably going to have to side with him. That's Sly for you though. Being right just for the sake of being right, even if that means straying away from the main argument (Jesus being the son of God).

You edited your post Sly. :lol: When I read it there were only two responses. Now, be the bigger man and apologize. Or just be a d-bag and leave as usually whenever you're wrong.

Chocolate Fudge, Pumpkin, Butterscotch, Banana. Any ice cream that has candy bar or cookie pieces in it is good also.

The thing is, I can just as easily say that I KNOW Christianity is a bunch of bologna, end of story. Really, you gotta look on both ends of the spectrum.

I like it that way. If it's ambiguous everyday life would be so much more complicated :x. It makes right of way a little more instinctive and a little less spontaneous :). Maybe it just has to do with the fact that women are flattered easier than men, so a guy holding it open has more of a purpose than a girl holding it.

You're probably too nice.

Yes, because those men have been discriminated against so much. Damn, we just have it soooooo hard. So all men should suffer inequalities because of the past? Hmmm... Holding doors open for girls is "suffering"? Yeah, it might be a bit unfair but that's a pretty strong word you used for such a minor cause.

But that totally contradicts the true meaning of equality. Why must ending racism be in the hands of only one race? Why can't the world work together in this?

Ooo, never thought of it that way. :)

I know there are programs targeted at a white audience, but why would it be so wrong to take the extra step of putting "White" in the name of the channel just as the blacks did?

Yeah, that's a morale invoking one. :shock: I'd save my family. I mean, 10k people is devastating but not on such a personal as your own family - and after all, it is a personal decision.

This might be a little off-topic, but what is it that you want to do that keeps you here?

Sorry did I mean oligopoly? :-# You can ignore my post for now until I fix it up.

Holy jesus I barely even made it to the end of that sentence. I'm scared to read the rest of the post. I think a :roll: would suffice here! ;)

That's fine and I agree. What I don't agree with is the double standard that if we had a WET, it would be considered racist.