Everything posted by Zierro
-
Things that annoy the HELL out of you.
That's gotta be the most posted thing here. XD That and people walking too slowly are the most frequent ones I've noticed (I even posted those myself).
- Food
- Food
-
What are you listening to right now!?
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Magic Johnson lol
-
Looking for a New Game? Ask Here!
Grand Theft Auto 4, Red Dead Redemption, Bioshock, Dragon Age, and Mass Effect. Tons of single player gameplay. Fable 2 and Assassin's Creed are also up there, but they are not as fun. Team Fort 2 from The Orange Box is great to goof around on and kill some noobs. Don't bother with Gears of War unless you're a pro. CoD 4 isn't that bad, but I would stay away from 3 and MW2 because they suck. Never played Battlefield. PS: If you've only played Reach and not Halo 3, I highly recommend getting it - much much better maps and a pretty different online experience overall.
-
What movie(s) did you last see?
There are people that like Shaun of the Dead? Hmmm... Learn something new everyday. :smile:
-
What are you listening to right now!?
The Residents - The Census Taker
- Mistakes
-
Things that annoy the HELL out of you.
Zombie apocalypse memes.
- Today...
-
What are you listening to right now!?
Venom - At War with Satan
-
What are you listening to right now!?
Danzig - How the Gods Kill
-
What are you listening to right now!?
Tool - H.
-
What are you listening to right now!?
The Residents - Jambalaya
-
Abortion
But yet pro-life advocacy completely demolishes all the unclear ambiguity of the leap from a bunch of cells of non-importance to sacred personhood, right? That it is fine to kill billions of sperm by masturbating or wearing a condom, but immoral to kill one fresh fetus. I'm curious. What do you have against sperm? I am a believer of pro-choice, but that's not because it's the "perfect side" as there are a handful of flaws and moral discrepancies on both sides. But to claim your argument is the honest, moral, scientific, truthful superior and the other is a fluff-filled scandal really tells us something. You're completely disregarding any benefit to abortion - such as when a woman has been raped and never consented to having a child, but yet must go through with the pregnancy because if she doesn't, it's the same thing as walking into a random store and killing an innocent person. There's also your willingness to argue that abortion being legal is a cause of sexual abuse. :-? This is a very important point to take into account.
- Food
- Today...
-
What are you listening to right now!?
Soundgarden - Burden in my Hand I lost my head again, would you cry for me
- Food
-
Food
Disney World has the best chicken strips I've ever tasted. They charge you an arm and a leg (not to mention the cost of getting into Disney), but even with how financially destitute I am, I say it's worth the deliciousness. Chili's has some pretty generous buffalo chicken strips in their salad. I have to admit that I've never been that satisfied from a salad before. And so that you know my opinion is ear-worthy: I am a connoisseur of salads. :-w
-
Abortion
If she decides not to tell anyone, of course she is at fault for deciding not to tell anyone. And if she were threatened then that could be reported as well and action most likely would be taken, resulting in him not being able to have anymore contact with her and the situation being known. Not to say it wouldn't be a difficult decision to make, but it is still a decision that can be made. Blaming abortion for the cause of rapes being unknown is silly because she could just as easily tell her parents the father is someone other than the coach or that she consented to the coach. It purely comes down to what she lets be known. Again, a difficult decision, but she is capable of standing up for her own rights, consulting officials, and cutting ties to the man who she's probably better off never seeing again. She most certainly can get away from him, and she most certainly should. If abortion were illegal, you'd see more cases of parents neglecting and abusing their children - as they did not want to have them but the government prevented them from ending the children's suffering much sooner. You'd also see fuller foster homes.
-
Philosophy, Riddles and complete mind[bleep]s
I do understand that it is semantically impossible to "fail" because they would always still be trying infinitely. But what boggles me is the assertion that they are sure to achieve it. That it's an impossible scenario for them to try, and try, and try, and try, and try...--->>> As for the princesses, ask one which of her two sisters are younger and pick that one. If you ask this to the oldest one, she will truthfully tell you that the youngest one is younger, therefore you should pick the younger one. If you ask this to the youngest one, she will lie and tell you that the oldest one is younger, therefore you should pick the "younger" one. If you ask this to the middle one, it doesn't matter - you've already taken her out of the picture. So you're always safe in picking the "younger" of the two sisters.
-
Abortion
The girl not consulting her parents about it is what's covering it up - not abortion. And also that excludes all of the cases where the girl does consult her parents about the rape/affair. Society never fails to astonish me.
-
Philosophy, Riddles and complete mind[bleep]s
What makes you so sure of that assumption though? The claim sounds very much like a non-sequitur. I mean, I do believe it's completely possible that they can do it, but I don't see how having an infinite amount of time to type ensures their eventual success. It is completely impossible for them to always/infinitely type something that is not Hamlet?
- Today...