pureprayer

Godsword is good for slayer if Dragon Claws is your other option. WHIPS ARE NOT IN THIS DEBATE! For god's sake, do you even know what a comparison is? Honestly, drop it. Your logic makes no sense. Thanks.. Lord Shalaj Ok honestly assuming you have 75 attack and have an Ags or even a Bgs you will have a whip. Hands down. BUT if this is a debate where you have nothing in the bank but torags, and enough money for claws/godsword you should buy a godsword because you have left over money (even for a whip) for other supplys. Now claws are crashing and going for 100% junk so if you have a lot of junk get claws. Assuming you are one of the 99% of people with a whip. And you are going to buy a bgs/claws, while keeping that whip, you WILL NOT use your godsword for slayer (sgs for spec). So if you are 50/50 on dragon claws or a bgs the "fact" that a godsword is better for slayer tasks is obsolete because you will not use your godsword for slayer. I can say 99% of people have a whip if they have money for a bgs. For pvp D claws are way better and for boss hunting its D claws assuming the cost factor. As a reminder D claws only requide 60 Attack so if you are a pure there good. Sorry for spelling mistakes im using IE and im tired. Again YOU WILL HAVE A WHIP IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY FOR CLAWS/BGS IF NOT GET A BGS.

There are three people in the game with untrimmed slayer. Proof

I know this should be in Tech and Computers but there are no active users there. When I try to load it on Firefox and Chrome this is what I get. Any suggestions would help. Again please dont move this.

Bari if everyone got equal play time in that game would it be alright?

You're falling into the pit known as the friend zone. Kick a rock down there. Hear it bounce? No, you didn't. Because there's no way out. 100% Agree there is no way out never was never will be.

Maybe the coach wanted to see who had heart? Where I live when my coach watches the football game he sees who tries 100% of the game. Just a thought.

I do that several times every day? Not sure if you were being serious. :| I ate stem, core, seeds, and the bottom.

Whip is more costly BUT if the poster had 70 attack and whips were cheaper then rune 2h's and the poster was either going to buy a bronze 2h or a rune 2h I would say get a whip. Unless said poster was going for strength xp. (or was f2p). If this was a thread in H & A I would say its rune 2h's but a whip is cheaper and way better. Your lack of logic baffles me. We were NOT discussing whips at all. OP never mentioned it AT ALL. He asked, "which is better, d claws or a godsword". WHY DID YOU BRING IN THE WHIP IF NOBODY ASKED FOR IT? Honestly ALL I SAID WAS YOU CANT USE "GODSWORDS ARE BETTER FOR SLAYER TASKS" AS A STRONG POINT BECAUSE YOU CAN EASILY BUY A WHIP AND IT IS BETTER.

I ate a FULL apple (stem and all)

Guy two said "1" which means true. I still don't get it. True = 1 The guy said = 1

It has to do with whoever strikes the ore first. If he does he has that little boost that can push him over the top and get the ore.

Level 80's-90's with 99 strength and craphouse defence/hp shouldn't either but were not opressing it are we? Lord_Shalaj, remember they were the one's who payed 100m+ fully knowing they would drop eventully but they decided to jump the gun and go for it. Makoto_the_Phoenix, good point. Theres a "Reason" its called a Godsword, not a "D-Claws-Own-The-Godsword Godsword." :| Makoto saw that on youtube. @3hit who ever said his full hp was 85? He could be ~95 and not wanted to waste a shark trying to be max health.

I heard that chinchompas are good money but im not 100% sure, im not even into hunting :wall: im still lvl 1 :wall: Hunting being killing not the hunter skill... Edit: Tripsis beat me to it.

Nope false rumor.

Kinda offtopic: Do you know Zarfot? Also I wonder how the new "soul collecting" will work Not personally, but he joined tip.it to post on this thread a few dozen pages back and said he was following it. What "soul collecting" :? It soul wars sorry and i misread the Behind the Scenes for February its actually a minigame where you kill slayer monsters or something.

Kinda offtopic: Do you know Zarfot? Also I wonder how the new "soul collecting" will work

Guy two said "1" which means true.

(insert stupid comment involving a super cannon and a vacuum) Or splittin the atamz.

[ CHARMS ]: [7Best efficiency for lvl 53] 0 Gold, 800 Green, 1200 Crimson, 250 Blue | Total Exp: 426,000 | Total Shards: 242,050 | Shard Cost: 6,051,250gp | Expected Lvl: 67 (562,594exp) Make Magpies, Leaches, and Iron Minotaurs And maybe a few terrorbirds to help speed the process. :thumbup: Gratz on 1.7k posts. If you have some golds it might push you to 68

Stats are slightly low for that, so slay 'till 65 and then dust devils. :thumbup: Considered that then looked at the 33 Slayer. Would be 70 summoning before 65 slayer.

Look, you can stop talking about what 'crazy' money demons are (actually, they're weak compared to green dragons). It does not matter what you get on a task. What does matter is the AVERAGE - and your arguing from a slayer level of 72, with melee stats in the low 80s. Obviously your not getting precisely what I am at armored zombies, nor are you doing anything resembling testing! You can't go there for 2 hours and then trumpet your XP rates as final, it requires literally dozens of hours to even attempt to get an accurate number. It's the averages that count - and mine are carefully calculated using literally hundreds of hours of testing by me, ydraisel, Zarfot, and Qeltar. Your one person with mid 80s stats and 72 slayer trying to argue about tasks that you won't even be getting in the next dozen levels! I respect your opinion, but there is a difference between opinions and facts. I'm not trying to argue about how fun slayer is. It's one of my favorite skills, and it's made me millions. What I AM arguing is that it is crappy XP. This is not an opinionated debate. It does not matter how fun you find it or how much you hate grinding blah blah blah. What matters is the cold hard XP rates - and unless you can show me some REAL testing to prove mine wrong, I'll take the numbers of myself and 3 other maxed, experienced players over a level 110 who's tried it for 2 hours. Actually Abyssal Demons are better money than Green Dragons. Green Dragons are about 400k per hour and you therefore need to kill them for 3 or 4 hours to make up what 1 Whip gets you. However, in 3 or 4 hours time at Abyssals you will ALWAYS get Rune items and very possibly a Whip in that amount of time. My best in 3 hours is a Whip and about 400k in Rune items which is about 1.8M, that's almost 5 hours of Green Dragons. Only once did I get 2 Whips in that amount of time. Slayer dosen't always give Abyssal Demon tasks though. Thats his main point. You cant base ALL of you rates on fire giants or Abyssal Demons. [/hide] Well duh, agreed. But on that same note, slayer doesn't alwayz give you horrible tasks such as kalphites, or miths or steels, or wyverns and such. And even if you do have bad luck and get those tasks, again you can cancel or perm them. What's not clear about that?? Because after that, tasks are great money makers and are very easy, fast, and good exp. Canceling a task wastes ~60k The rates still dont compare to zombies. What do you mean wastes about 60k?? how? 35 slayer points is enough for 250 deaths and 1000 minds which is 65kish

Split up and you all look for worlds. Toast that was mostly for the equipment.

Slayer untill 68 and then waterfiends?

Look, you can stop talking about what 'crazy' money demons are (actually, they're weak compared to green dragons). It does not matter what you get on a task. What does matter is the AVERAGE - and your arguing from a slayer level of 72, with melee stats in the low 80s. Obviously your not getting precisely what I am at armored zombies, nor are you doing anything resembling testing! You can't go there for 2 hours and then trumpet your XP rates as final, it requires literally dozens of hours to even attempt to get an accurate number. It's the averages that count - and mine are carefully calculated using literally hundreds of hours of testing by me, ydraisel, Zarfot, and Qeltar. Your one person with mid 80s stats and 72 slayer trying to argue about tasks that you won't even be getting in the next dozen levels! I respect your opinion, but there is a difference between opinions and facts. I'm not trying to argue about how fun slayer is. It's one of my favorite skills, and it's made me millions. What I AM arguing is that it is crappy XP. This is not an opinionated debate. It does not matter how fun you find it or how much you hate grinding blah blah blah. What matters is the cold hard XP rates - and unless you can show me some REAL testing to prove mine wrong, I'll take the numbers of myself and 3 other maxed, experienced players over a level 110 who's tried it for 2 hours. Actually Abyssal Demons are better money than Green Dragons. Green Dragons are about 400k per hour and you therefore need to kill them for 3 or 4 hours to make up what 1 Whip gets you. However, in 3 or 4 hours time at Abyssals you will ALWAYS get Rune items and very possibly a Whip in that amount of time. My best in 3 hours is a Whip and about 400k in Rune items which is about 1.8M, that's almost 5 hours of Green Dragons. Only once did I get 2 Whips in that amount of time. Slayer dosen't always give Abyssal Demon tasks though. Thats his main point. You cant base ALL of you rates on fire giants or Abyssal Demons. [/hide] Well duh, agreed. But on that same note, slayer doesn't alwayz give you horrible tasks such as kalphites, or miths or steels, or wyverns and such. And even if you do have bad luck and get those tasks, again you can cancel or perm them. What's not clear about that?? Because after that, tasks are great money makers and are very easy, fast, and good exp. Canceling a task wastes ~60k The rates still dont compare to zombies.

[ CHARMS ]: [7Best efficiency for lvl 53] 0 Gold, 800 Green, 1200 Crimson, 250 Blue | Total Exp: 426,000 | Total Shards: 242,050 | Shard Cost: 6,051,250gp | Expected Lvl: 67 (562,594exp) Make Magpies, Leaches, and Iron Minotaurs