None2None

Lol, no, no lessers in lumby :lol: And I might make a support list, I just need some more time... :)

macros get banned without getting reported...and it takes an average of 1-2 weeks to get banned in the first place. Macroers use these 'throw away accounts' that your reporting to get the money, not to store or use it, that's what their 'mains' or 'mules' are for. I seriously dont recommend wasting your time doing that. :roll:

You can't even discuss it? Well that seems a bit extreem, though it is funny how little people have even looked in this forum...eh, if that's the case I'd definately say it should be allowed to be discussed, that's just crazy, I can understand telling people not to discuss macros, bots, cheats and bugs, but something that's borderline legal should be against the rules to discuss, I mean really, nothing has changed with the legality in the past 2 days we have been discussing this... Yea, normally true, I'll admit :) But then again, I'm pretty new on the forums, not meaning I'm not educated on forums, but meaning that I dont know the people here well, lets call that an unfair assumption on my part :wink: Yea, I knew that, most things have an encryption method...but it wouldn't be that hard...if you want to skip the whole 'hacking' thing, you could just get the plugin for FF unencripting most passwords ;) not to give your admins any ideas or anything (jk of course)...but I'm an admin on a different phpBB3 forum and I know how the acp works very well, and do know that I can see passwords, yet dont do anything, I'm higher than that, and after looking back, I'm sure your admins are aswell, that was another comment that I guess I shouldn't have said... #-o but keep in mind that strider is very close to Jagex aswell and I'm sure wouldn't scam or would risk a definate IP ban by Jagex and possible suit because of the mass-problems that he could cause...I doubt he would risk that... So I can't post other opinions? I dont get it...admin or not, we're all human and sometimes dont see every angle of every side...I proposed two other ideas and was attacked for it... :roll: ...and now, yes, I'm defending my actions. Why not support it, your communities are too far apart, you seem to be more competing than forming alliances, why not combine guides and make better as opposed to trying to improve your weak point that they have strong and having them repair their own weak points you have strong... It's like having 2 weak communities as opposed to two strong, I dont get that whole 'we're never supporting them' statement... :notalk: Well, at first I gave 3 ideas on how to possibly deal with the issue at hand, sure, after an admin had spoken, but the point is is that the other two ideas posted by me were not stated before... :wink: Again, now it seems I'm more defending my actions of posting the two other ideas more than advocating...or at least that's the angle I'm seeing this topic from... :roll:

ember3579 thoes are some pretty cool suggestions :) Uhh...are the moss giants normally around that area? I dont totally get the question...but monsters have a general 'area' where they are found, and I'm suggesting that that space moves 50-100 spaces all around and little fights could happen if their space overlaps another monster's space. And sure, you could have rocks have more than ore ore before disappearing, but I dont recommend having a bunch of gray ones to take their place, it would be too much of a waste of space to do that, why not have them appear?

Yea, it should probably be moved to suggestions, but agreed 100%, something along the lines of that needs to be added... Maybe spend all and spend X :shock: :lol:

Yea, I get what your saying, but the "good" members will put insight into their posts and actually give some decent info...I'd say my average post is 5-10 lines long...so not to shabby by me ;) But then you could go to price checks, (just an example; one of many)...It would be possible for someone to go on and on and fluff their posts beyond 5 lines with useless info, or they could just cut to the chase, same goes for the market, there's no reason to go indepth when all you need to say is "100-500k" or "I'll but 5k, PM me in-game" There would be a counter argument, but yes, I agree, useless posts do get very annoying at the same time... :-k Maybe a rep system would work to solve your problem? idk...just a suggestion...

Tip.it has never linked to any other fan sites or 3rd party clients in the 6 years it's been up and running. Ever. Users in the forums may have, but the website itself hasn't. Regardless of how trustworthy you think Strider may be, there is always the possibility something can be compromised. You could argue Jagex could be compromised too, but Jagex is getting payed to keep things secure. They abide by certain security related laws due to the handling of credit cards and personal info. Third party clients have no such obligation and can screw you over on a whim. Overall, 3rd party clients are for the lazy people among us. There is no need for anything more than a standard web browser for anything rs related. implying that you never did link to them in the first place? so is he wrong in saying unbanned? Or did you link and now are just arguing against me because your all trying to back up your admin...which is great and everything, but you cant always suck up...and who's to know that one of your admins don't go bad...the whole forums could go down or they could try everyone's tipit passwords with their RS accounts, I'm sure many would work...we can go on with what-if's all day, that doesn't mean anything is going to happen, hence the disclaimer... for all I care tell everyone that they should scan it every time they dl a new one...I think your being way to uptight personally. :roll:

I don't work for TIF, but even I can understand why. Why in the world would you give free publicity to your rivals? Seriously, is it that hard for you to understand? Why consider them your rivals, from the looks of it, you used to have a link to it, why did you back then? You seem scared that people will look at their community as better and stay there, I dont see why.

It wont go wrong, strider isnt a bad guy.Yea, that's what I see Sure , and while we are at it , why dont we replace every single one of our guides with a link to zybez, or runehq .... :roll: Well, if you come up with your own legal client, tell me and that could be a better idea, but unlike zybez or runehq, you dont have everything that SS does, why not let your users use the resource that they have and you dont? :roll: Believe me, I dont suggest things to hurt your site, only benefit ;)

Ah, very good point, I totally forgot about that #-o , lol, Idk if I made this before or after that was made and removed, but eh, I'll change that :P Yea, idk how it would be made in full, I've had everything from 'propaganda newspapers' telling progress of the war mattering which side you got the paper from to making it another small mini-game, all that I care about is that it's actually on Runescape's map, another mini-game would be O.K, but a bit to in the norm for me, idk if you were siggesting a mini-game or not, but eh ;) course not :) alchemy should stay the same for the sake that alchemy is the science of changing one thing to another, the laws of nature wouldn't change :) Well yea, agressive monsters would probably only stay agressive to players that they are now, but at the same time, monsters that arn't agressive to players might become agressive to other monsters or guards ;) Yea, that's exactly what I had in mind :) And as for adding an extra random, seeing the macroers that we have now (and had when I origionally made the suggestion) I thought another, different one, may be in order. I dont think it would be too hard to impliment, all a player would have to do is keep an eye on what other players are doing, if everyone suddenly runs away, it would be a good hint :)

:P And there's just some mroe proof that the possibilities are endless. Thanks for your support :) I'd make a support list if it didn't have so many separate sections :lol:

This is also a main reason why marijuana is illegal. It cannot be taxed. The government doesn't like things coming into their country that they can't make money off of. Wow...get educated please? Legalization means sales will become commertial, i.e. companies begining to make marijuana cigarettes, all sales by law must be taxed, therefore when you go to the gas station and pick up a pack costing you $100, BY LAW they have to give $20 to the government. Oh and did I mension the taxation of growing it, the seeds, and the sales to the company and to the store? Dealers would no longer exist, they would be pushed out by big business...which is taxed...your dealer selling you the drug without giving a portion to the government is possible because that item isn't meant to be taxed. Why? because it isn't meant to be! :wall: :wall: :wall: :roll: Thanks for making my day... =D> I was agreeing with you, you know that right? I was just saying another reason why it isn't legal. With the system of getting it now, if everything with dealers stayed, there would be no way to tax it. I was just reiterating your statement... You just got mad because I agreed with you, good job... I still dont totally get what your saying, but ok... :-k And you got my earlier, not edited, more flame-ful post >.< ...I went back and changed a lot after thinking about it, guess you beat me to my post though, quick reply :XD:

This is also a main reason why marijuana is illegal. It cannot be taxed. The government doesn't like things coming into their country that they can't make money off of. Argh, I'm really sorry to say this...but please, learn something about taxation before talking. Legalization means sales will become commertial, i.e. companies begining to make marijuana cigarettes, all sales by law must be taxed, therefore when you go to the gas station and pick up a pack costing you $100, BY LAW they have to give $20 to the government. (assuming the tax is 20%) Oh and did I mension the taxation of growing it, the seeds, and the sales to the company and to the store? God knows how much that would add to the governments profit. We make tons of money off of the taxation of alcohol and tobacco. We can most definately do the same with marijuana. Dealers would no longer exist, they would be pushed out by big business...which is taxed...your dealer selling you the drug without giving a portion to the government is possible because that item isn't meant to be taxed. Why? because it isn't meant to be sold in the first place! Here's an example. Go out, sell a joint, and then try to pay the government for selling marijuana, they aint gunna accept it, it's not on their tax list. :wall: :wall: :wall: :roll: Thanks for making my day... =D>

That's not true at all, the government got in power because it was what out public thought would be the best situation for the time, the government doesn't know everything, in a democracy, the government is only chosen to support the people and enforce the major opinions. The government is NEVER always right. Nobody has ever died from smoking marijuana. Well, as much as I wan't marijuana to be legalized, there has to be a flaw in that fact. I dont know if it's that smoke inhilation deaths all go to tobacco or if it's that during a high, the drug isn't considered, but believe me, while driving, your not as sharp, and smoke will always hurt you, I dont care what drug your talking about. Smoke kills. Now after rebutting to a few other posts, I'll post my own opinions. Yes, marijuana should be legalized, but not because of a high that people get or because tobacco and alcohol are legalized, so why not make the drug problem worse by adding another addictive drug. This is why: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ I'm not sure if it's been brought up before, but America (and many other countries) are in major debt and we keep on trying to fix it. Well, as we learned from tobacco and alcohol, drug taxes can be set high and not hurt sales. So what do we do with marijuana? Tax the hell out of it! If we made takex on marijuana as high as 20% (and considering prices for the drug remain the same) each "joint" sold could be up to $10, 2 of that being to the government. I dont know if you're able to think in such small terms, but this could almost turn our problem around, or at least lessen it to such an extreem degree, life would be awesome. Summary - Legalize - Tax - Get High. 8-)

Rimmington? #-o :lol: Yea, I'm more of a skiller, but if your trying to earn money...dang...sorry, so are they, and their soo much better at it to tell the truth :wall: :roll: Another Edit: :lol:

Argh, Spring break took it off the RSOF ...I'll put it back up later... PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING! __________ This IS NOT just one suggestion, in fact, it is quite a few, some you may agree with, some disagree with, but I decided to compile all of them into one...uhh...mega...thread?...anyway "Live Maps" is just my general term :P ...If a mod thinks it would be better if I had multiple threads for each suggestion, either tell me or just take action :) ...If any of these ideas have been suggested, tell me and I can alter them so that they havent been :wink: ...NOW READ! :lol: __________ Basically, this suggestion is stating that things should change once in a while in the land of Runescape. Changing maps or ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬Ålive mapsÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ

Well, I have a feeling that admins on tip.it check Runescape frequently eh? I would like for everyone to know that the SS staff and coders arn't dumb, and in the end I have a feeling they'll make it legal even if it ends up being an i.e. or FF plugin that requires you getting through Runescape like normal. _________________ Anyway, after taking that into account, from a person without 100 posts, my opinion is: 1.) I'm quite sure that you have at least a few Runescape Moderators on this site who also check Runescape frequently and would be happy to immediately notify one of the 2 or 3 mods that I see on all the time...make it legal to have the SS download site posted, yet have your moderators check before they get on, and before they get off to check if it is legal or not. 2.) Another suggestion would be at least to link to the SS site, yet set a disclaimer saying that you arn't responcible for the legality of it and say that it is choppy on wether it is allowed or not, tell people to constantly check the site for updates on what's going on, nothing that happens would be your fault, you should have no problems with legality after that. 3.) Well, it's been named, but the only other possibility that I can think of is to not allow it what-so-ever and to just let the news float around as it has been, and then finally allow it only after everything has been sorted out and it is going to be 100% legal as it had been in the past (that is of course unless you dont want to make it legal what-so-ever...but I wouldn't see why that would be rational, it's a great program) _________________ Thoes suggestions are in order by which I like the best, ATM it seems #3 has been chosen, but maybe after reading the other two some other ideas have popped into your head? idk. _________________ (lol, my first half-long post on tip.it :P you may be getting a few more of these if I'm in the mood to type :lol: ) Cheers!

Lol, nah, started with a black streak, transformed it, liquified it, filtered it, repaired it, moved some parts, and masked it red :P

Yea, that's be pretty awesome, but I have a feeling you may get a couple bucks for 10 pupular clips... Nonetheless awesome ;)

This was my result... :roll: PS rocks. :) Rate it or comment...idk...it's abstract... 8)

You'll ahve to define "drug" to make that statement, I would say there are many out there that are much less harmful...and the smoke from anything definately harms the body. The tallest man in the world died from a foot infection. :) If you read the entire article, it does say that the smoke harms you, but a casual marijuana smoker takes in an enormously less amount of smoke than other smokable product users. Also, by drug, I was talking about any tobacco product or illegal substance that is inhaled/eaten/injected/absorbed/snorted. I dont know where you got that fact, but here's an opposing side http://www.homedrugtestingkit.com/thc.html I wont argue anymore, dont wanna get too off topic, I personally say make a topic on it ;) I'm all for the legalization of it, buy just like to debate both sides of an argument :)

That's a good site, but actually, the reason that it is believed the guildings fell like they did was suspected that the heat of the explotion, the continuous fure and the impact was enough to destroy fire-proofing and actually soften the steel beams that were holding up the building, I forget exactly how long the buildings remained standing was, but it was much longer than having an immediate physical movement causing it. So I still keep my theory, but also will suggest that that site does not go totally 100% off truths, but partially off of assumptions and what certain (maybe reputable) people think. :) (And just the fact that this many sites exist disproving the theories shows the impact that they had on many people [no, thoes people were not nessarily dumb ;) ])

Yes, I've looked over many many religions and in the end still accept Christianity as the one that I accept the most. On the other hand I find it interesting the many uses that humans put God to, I mean really, think about it, everything from peace to war exists in most holy books, and guess what? Still exists today.

You'll ahve to define "drug" to make that statement, I would say there are many out there that are much less harmful...and the smoke from anything definately harms the body. The tallest man in the world died from a foot infection. :)

Do I believe it is true? no. I believe that America was attacked by Osama Bin Laden (not Saddam ) and thousands of people were killed. Bush would have blamed it on Iraq if he was to make it a conspiracy :roll: . On the other hand I will say that many of the conspiracists and their theorys are very thought provoking. Loose Change (I know it has been mensioned but I would like to bring it back up) was not a simple "Oh! Lets make a video and try to start something!" video. It was well thought out and had (and has) some very compelling arguments. Lets just say that not all people who believe in these theories are stupid ;) . But again, for me, it isn't good enough to disprove the thousands of deaths that day and the many more that came after. (Why is everyone so hostile in these threads? Try to open your mind to other ideas and suggestions. Not only will you have learned something new, but you also will be able to have a good debate in the future on relative or similar subjects. Again I reiterate - debates, not arguments. :) )