Iamdan

Another reason why Jagex doesn't use such functions is because it wouldn't work. It isn't hard to change the process name to something else. I think one version of scar gives the user the option of changing the process name without having to change it them self. Verminox: Google OCR

I have no idea you just said.

My style is basking in my own awesomeness. Meh I don't follow any trends like emo or gangster, I have a little thing I like to call personality.

Game Guard? Don't make me laugh. Maplestory has Game Guard and they still have problems. One of my friends only plays so he can hack it. No, YOU don't make me laugh little kid, you obviously have no idea how Runescape 'hacks' work. A protecting system would render useless all current Rs scrips thus bots and cracks. Of course, programmers will always make programs to go around the security, but it will make it all much harder and long for them. There's not a game out there that is not being botted, no point in mentioning Maple Story, atleast they have a basic protection. Our 'protection' is randoms, which most are an ongoing annoyance for all honest players. As it is now, Rs is totally unprotected, heck it's a browser game no surprise, and as long as it stays as such, it will be a childstrick to bot on it. Jagex can't even stop them, they can just ban them if they get caught. I tried googling it and didn't find anything, could you explain how xtrap and game guards work? I am skeptical that they will work on Runescape because it is java and the bots work differently than they do in other games. However I can't tell if it will work or not because I don't know HOW they work.

How would making a new file change anything? The macroers will see it in the client straightaway, then delete it/use 2 etc.

Wow you are a whiner. Everybody has their own problems, you aren't the only one. Last year a close friend died, 2 close friends wanted to kill themselves and I had to talk them out of it or at least putting it off at least once a week for almost a year. They attempted it a few times, and one of them is still thinking about it now. Last year I started failing in school and broke up with 2 gfs. I had and still have a terrible relationship with my parents, to the point in that the only times we communicate is fighting, and it feels awkward just being in the same house as them, along with a bunch of other stuff I can't think of right now. Yet I knew that everybody has their own problems so I kept optimistic and things are picking up now. If breaking up with your gf and your mum getting her tires slashed makes you consider suicide then you are are in for a surprise later on when you run into real problems.

Jagex uses a java applet, there is a very limited amount of things they can do with your computer. How would you suggest making it un-delectable? Also, even if they make it un-deletable what is stopping macroers from using 2 uids? Just copy one into the folder and rename the extension of the other so the server ignores it when they are playing on their main, and switch when they macro. Macroers basically do that now anyway. Read my post above yours, and no_way2go's post. First cheaters used a program which let each other type the word in for them, then they developed OCR's to do it for them.

3 letters: OCR Google it.

1. No it didn't. 2. Only the obvious macroers would do this. 4. Failing randoms already triggers more randoms, if they are still failed then account = flagged. 5. It would take up too much memory to check this 6. Already does 7. The server already checks for a modified client via a reflection method. 8. Already done 9. It might already be done, I'm not sure. 10. See 5

Artificial_Doom_Flavor that would actually be quite easily bypassed. Generally macroers use an array of players. If one account gets messed up it switches to the next. There would have to be some sort of constant event each time the random event occurred, the macro could look out for this and kill the account then switch to the next.

Nobody is outputting any ideas because there is no way to effectively stop macroing. I have never seen any ideas to stop macroing which will actually work. I had my own idea (see "Real way to stop macroers, won't affect gameplay" in bugs and suggestions) which will kill client hacked macroers but won't stop colour clickers and BCEL injection etc.

Ip isn't going to work. Also, every macroer with half a brain knows about the uid. It is easy to either delete it all the time, or have 2 uid files, one which is used when playing with a main or pker, and another for macroing. Unsigned applet can't use uid.dat.

Jack Daniels and coke over ice does great for me. I guess it's not healthy but it can be if you have it with a chicken and salad sandwich. But hey, why wait for summer? :D

I got it to work just by putting encoderadiobtn.checked = true etc in brackets, but that is much better. Also, how would I go about separating characters in an edit box? The user inputs a sentence, and I need to assign each letter to a variable as a number, so I can output that sentence but using a simple encryption I will change the letters so it is x letters forward or backward. EG: 'hello' 3 letters forward will become 'jhoor', 'jhoor' 3 letters backward will be 'hello'. I have a scrollbar that I use to set the variable 'key' and will just add 'key' to each letter, then add an if statement 'if it is over 26, then take away 26.' BTW I did copy and paste the code in, some versions of delphi have slightly different syntax than others. What I have written compiled fine with delphi 7SE, but if I wanted to compile it with delphi 5 then i would have to change it to if encoderadiobtn.Checked := true then encode; It doesn't compile without that colon.

^^ Same, I picked ranger and that account is still 6 range.

I don't understand how people can find borat funny. There were a couple funny things but not many, and there was waay too much naked men in it.

Bad things get better ratings. The media doesn't care about the quality of what they do, they exist to make money.

Try playing unsigned. Also, how much does windows slow down for signed and unsigned?

Processing power is mostly what Java uses. However if your 2ghz cpu usage goes up to 90% when you play Runescape that could be a lot of random things. As Cruiser updating your Java first is a good idea. If you get the same problem when you choose to play Runescape with default then it is probably not your Java version that is the problem. How much does it slow windows down when you play Runescape?

Fixed the first problem now I just have this question: Also, how would I go about separating characters in an edit box? The user inputs a sentence, and I need to assign each letter to a variable as a number, so I can output that sentence but using a simple encryption I will change the letters so it is x letters forward or backward. EG: 'hello' 3 letters forward will become 'jhoor', 'jhoor' 3 letters backward will be 'hello'. I have a scrollbar that I use to set the variable 'key' and will just add 'key' to each letter, then add an if statement 'if it is over 26, then take away 26.' (old post)>>This is in Delphi 7SE if encoderadiobtn.Checked = true then encode; if decoderadiobtn.Checked = true then decode; if encoderadiobtn.Checked = false and decoderadiobtn.Checked = false then MessageDlg('Please choose encode or decode' , mtError, [mbOk], 0,); It is part of a start button procedure It compiles and runs fine, except when I click start with them both unchecked the error doesn't come up when it should, encode runs the procedure and the message, (it should just run the procedure) and decode runs the procedure like it should. What I want it to do, is display the message if none are checked, run the encode procedure if it is checked, and the decode procedure if it is checked. I am sure this is something really stupid that I overlooked, but I have been trying to get this simple thing to work for about 20 minutes. Can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong?

It doesn't help, and they get you banned quickly.

This is a good suggestion :shock: :shock: Did you not read my post right below it? That idea would not work.

Yeah I did need a precise answer. I know trig, I have been doing it since grade 8. A big part of what we have been doing this semester is linear equations and graphs, I think we do trig for the next exam. When he did it on the board, he used the gradient and the distance formula to work out the angle - using knowledge of linear equations and graphs like we have been doing this term.

Cheers, I wasn't expecting someone to take the time to take a picture. There seems to be a few ways of doing it. assasin_696: If the gradient = tan of the angle then shouldn't the angle to the x axis should be -tan*gradient? Only problem is that I get a different answer... the gradient of -1,3 to 3,4 is 1/4 so the angle to the x axis is 11.25. the gradient of -1.3 to 5,1 is 2/6 so the angle to the x axis is 21.822 simple trig tells us that that second angle is equal to the rest of the first. so the angle at -1,3 is 33.07 The gradient of 5,1 to 3,4 is 1.5 so the angle to x is 56.31, take away 11.25 leaves us with the angle of 45.06 That leaves with the top angle being 180-45.06-33.07= 101.87 :( My teacher did it with just the gradient somehow, I'm sure he didn't use trig formulas.

Thank you. What unit of measurement does the distance formula work out? It can't be the same unit used to space the points because the hypotenuse is about 7.5cm, not 32cm. My teacher used the gradients when he did it on the board. Something about -tan of the gradient. Know what method he was doing? Where I am we don't have all those varieties of maths. We just have difficulty levels. I am in grade 11 maths B. It goes numeracy and literacy, pre-vocational, Maths A, Maths C, Maths B. (Maths B is harder than C, but if you do C then B is compulsory for some reason.