Hold up. I feel this discussion is going in circles. Obviously everybody has their own opinions and it seems here that nobody is going to budge on the matter. But that is perfectly alright, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. First of all, the Tip.It Times is authored by our Editorial Panel. What is written by the Editorial Panel is therefore the opinion of the individual author and their views do not reflect those of the owner, the administration nor Tip.it as a whole. What this essentially means is that the times is the perfect place to voice opinions on current RuneScape events as this article does. The Panel encourages discussion and debate (but not flaming and personal attacks..) and therefore there will always be some topics which are more controversial than others. That should be a given. People writing for an editorial paper don't say what they think everybody would like to hear - they say exactly what they think. This promotes discussion and debate. The article published this week by Racheya is about a current event and I feel it was a perfect topic for the times this week. Many valid points were raised in the article. After reading the article, you know exactly what the author's viewpoint on the matter is and some of you disagree with it. That is exactly what the Times is about. Opinions. Everyone is entitled to their own and everyone is entitled to voice their opinions in an article. This is not the first article to upset anyone and it will certainly not be the last. When we're talking opinions, where there is no right or wrong answer, it is impossible to hit a topic everyone agrees with. Such a topic just does not exist. However, it is obvious some bits of the article come off in a condescending nature. There is no denying this. I'm sure the author would agree that had these bits been worded better it would have improved the article. But the article has already been published. You don't see top newspapers editing their stories because they were raising controversy. And therefore I see no reason why Tip.It would modify or edit the article because of some controversy raised by it, except in the case of legal issues. The Panel stands by the article, condescending or not, because that is what the panel believes in - Debate and Discussion. Could have been written differently, but the fact is it was not and it would show that the panel does not take pride in their publications if they were to edit or remove articles because of a little bit of controversy. The Panel fully recognizes that it may not have been the best worded article, but what exactly can be done about it? Finally, some of you are persistent that the author was directing this article towards a specific group of players. Although in this case that is absolutely false (the article was written prior to posts made by the author on any topics on the matter), I fail to see what is wrong with this. If someone delivers a speech that you totally disagree with and you write a very one sided article against it, what is the problem there? That is exactly what an editorial is. And that is exactly what this article is. The strong opinions of the author on a matter that disgusts them. This leaves a wide space for someone to step up with a counterarticle on the subject presenting the other side of the matter, perhaps as strongly opinionated as this one is. In conclusion, there is absolutely no way we can say articles like this will never surface again. Why would we obstruct someone's opinions on a valid topic of discussion well within what is appropriate on our website? Perhaps this will ease some of your concerns, maybe it will fuel them. But this is exactly where the Panel stands on this matter and this is exactly how the Administration feels on the matter. Disagree if you want. It's your opinion, no? Cowman_133 Tip.It Administrator