yonman14

Here's where you're misunderstanding things. Science is concerned with how things work or came about. Therefore validation is needed for scientific beliefs. Also, you can't have true PROOF in science, as science is really about explaining what man's best guess about how things work is. Another comment: There is no evidence for the creation of something from nothing. There is evidence for the Big Bang, but that does not explain the existence of that very first atom and the forces (or maybe even only one force) acting on it.

Wow, this is quite an impressive argument. After taking a year of physics and understanding entropy, I was bothered by it. But wow, I can't believe I couldn't understand that entropy could in fact be a proof of God's existence. Kudos to you man, this is an mazing theory. You oughta consider publishing some kind of argument based on this. Yeah...I'm really impressed. P.S. After reading over my post I realized it could sound slightly sarcastic, it isn't...I really am amazed by insane's reasoning.

Two points I'd like to make on this statement. One, the FIFA rankings had the US at 5 overall. Although the ranking system makes about as much sense as the BCS, that isn't the media doing anything, the world's governing body of soccer had the US team hyped up. Second, the article in SI was all about inciting fan interest. About the topic in general. America is still the haven for a handful of major sports. Baseball, basketball, football, golf, hockey, tennis (could be wrong here, don't know much about tennis :) ) and extreme sports like snowboarding and skateboarding. The fact that all of these leagues can be moderately to extremely sucessful in America, and that the place to be for the elite in these sports is America shows that the USA still has a pretty strong hold on world sports. Just wait until the next summer Olympics, you'll see :D

Looking back, it humors me that the black ranger was black, the yellow ranger was Asian, and the pink ranger was a seemingly promiscuous(spelling?). Ah, playing to racial sterotypes is always a hoot. Also, you can watch a few episodes on youtube. Kept me entertained for a bit.

You might have to work through it until the kitten grows into a full fledged cat. Kittens are really hyperactive and will do things like nip at fingers. Grownup cats do those types of things much less often.

Did you grow up in a christian family? It doesn't matter :P that arguement is a fallacy, 'ad ignorantium'. Just because something cannot be disproven does not mean it is true. Quite right. That being said, Religion isn't isn't about proof or what not. It's a matter of faith. I'm NOT saying that people should refuse to believe in some things that science has shown (I refuse to say prove, because Science can't PROVE anything, all it does is suggest what human's best guess for things happening is). I'm merely suggesting that one shouldn't have to look for proof to validate their religion, they should know on the inside that it is truth, or at least what they believe in.

I've palyed RuneScape (obviously :)). Also I've played Knight Online, it's pretty good, but gets WAY repetitive. Ye, more repetitive than RuneScape.

Have you done his little miniquest, it might be required to buy Bloods.

Actually, this isn't quite Zezima's view in Runescape...You gotta add in the hordes of people following him, as well as the the loads and loads of spam in the message box. :P

I think that in regards to crying, just like most things in life, you need to find a balance. Being oversensitive and crying at everything bad is unhealthy, as well as the flip side of never crying. That being said, I'd say that in general guys are afraid to cry becaue they're worrying about their self image. Like I said before, it's really about finding the happy medium.

Did you see someone with the name none? That's a pretty cool name, sorta like null... [/sarcasm]

Around 1 year and 364 days. :P Here's to another 1 year and 364 days!

Yeah going for max prayer :pray: and max slash bonus. Only got rune gloves because I havn't finished RfD. My strategy can vary depending on when I'm playing. Of course I start off by flicking on Ultimate Strength and Incedible Relfexes. If I'm playing at a time that PC is very busy, the quality of the players is normally higher, so I can afford to just sit there killing the monsters racking up the XP (I know this is a little selfish), but if I'm playing at a time that's less busy, and go for the Portals, starting with the one to the right and working my way around. Usually the game is finished by at most when I get to the yellow one, but normally before then.

I think it might be a swarm of bugs kicking up dust, but who knows...

I honestly think that 1 person alone could destory all 4 portals in 8 minutes.

Cats for sure! I've got two of them and their antics just entertain me so much.

Dude, I'm totally with you there. Been trying for this one girl since 9th grade (in 11th grade now) and it sure is tough, ain't it?

About a minute ago, after 1.3k tokens...I FINALLY GOT A BRONZE DEFENDER! Hip hip hooray x3!

woah that doesnt sound fair He knows me, don't worry...I wasn't just randomly being really mean. n64: were you wearing a wealth ring?

I hate you n64jive. I've used 2k tokens and not one defender.

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. At this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad.

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. At this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad.

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. At this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad.

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. At this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad.

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. At this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad.