obfuscator

I can think of one or two occasions off the top of my head when this has not been done, and I admit that was a mistake on our part. Doing this is our SOP and it happens almost on every occasion.

We are always sure to consult the active ingame moderators when taking action on something such as that that we don't understand.

Ahh I'm torn in this series. I really want the sharks to do well but gotta root for vancouver, being canadian and all...

Indeed. This discussion would have gone a lot better if everyone was as civil as you (and Michael for that matter) have been, although I'll admit the staff could have acted a bit more civilly on occasion.

I'd also like to point out that several TEF members have managed to remain quite civil and not have a single post removed.

Or, you could post without being derogatory in the first place.

Grats :) 2k more to beat me :P

Nope. You can edit them to nothing though.

Menu font looks really out of place compared to the background imo...

Lol @ boston. Sucks for Kaberle though, thought he played a great game except for that awful giveaway...

No, Mexico would be our socks.

Well, if it's something like a phone call or text message then how the hell do you provide proof? Better yet, how do you show them the functions/script in question? Pastebin.com

Who told you that? Not everything has to be referenced. So seriously, where did you get that from? I meant with the contacting Jagex, which the moderation hasn't shown proof of doing after being asked multiple times for it. Because, for the thousandth time, it took place in a manner in which we can't provide proof. We're currently in the process of getting said tangible proof, also for the thousandth time.

They're also right across the border from the US, call them our hat. Shrug. And America is Canada's underpants. :P

. . . really? :rolleyes: Compared to being able to click and view in one second, yeah.

Can't speak for whatever anyone else decided to do then. But that is our SOP for sig violations.

Deleting all of our signatures is also an inconvenience. I didn't delete any signatures. I simply removed the rule breaking parts; and since I'm sure you all want to abide by the rules, your signatures would need no further changes.

A lot more painful then just being able to view the forums in one second.

And I have registered there. But it's an inconvenience.

It makes it a lot harder for us to verify that the scripts are acceptable when we can't just view them. If he was truly interested in working with us he'd have never made the forums private. Bearing in mind as well, the only "reason" given for doing that was that it's for "spam reasons", which makes absolutely no sense.

Posts speculating on the personal lives of tip.it staff have been removed. Further posting in this vein will result in warnings and or bans.

Actually, he used the multiple scripts posted there that are illegal by the admittance of your own admins to remove links as per our forum rules.

I dont care how you bloody talk to jagex, darkdude has posted that they were in contact with jagex before they began removing scripts. If you're going to make a statement like that, back it up with evidence. NO EVIDENCE OF ANY FORM OF CONTACT WITH JAGEX HAS BEEN PRESENTED. Because we cannot provide evidence of the contact we had in the form the contact was made, as stated several times previously. As you asked for, we are getting the evidence of contact with Jagex. Surely you understand this takes a few days as most people don't work on weekends?

Where exactly did we say we hadn't contacted Jagex? What we said was we had not contacted them via email. You requested an email from them verifying their opinions and we're doing what you asked for.

Also, all deleted posts are still visible to all moderators. So the so called "sympathetic" mods can still see them.