Romy

There definitely is one. Or a whole lote more than one. I could list some, but there's always the easy way out, it's easy to twist these things around and call it unjust. To be frank, I doubt either of us can convince the other, so I'd rather leave it at that.

Can't think of a specific one at the moment, but I'm sure there is.

So you're saying murder can be justified? I don't know if he is, but I am. Ofcourse, that depends on what "the ends" is all about. And to me, if "the ends" is meaningful enough, yes, even murder is justified.

Thanks again Goon :D. 10/10

Make sure you'll visit the Netherlands: drinking allowed at 16+. BUT #1 Don't Visit Amsterdam, as it completely sucks balls. #2 if you drink (local) beer, only drink a Heineken if there's nothing else. Get Hertog Jan, as it rules any other dutch beers. As for Heineken drinkers that are not from the Netherland: What is wrong with you? Export Heiniken tastes like ...grosss. In the Netherlands it's acceptable, but there are much better choices. Fixed. Amsterdam is a great place for tourist to visit. It's an iconic location that everyone has to experience at least once. Much like Las Vegas. Amsterdam is so different compared to the rest of Netherlands.

Ooh, 10/10. :P @Thanks Goon. ;)

Why would she call 911? Shouldn't she call a doctor, or a gynecologist?

I feel like counting, lol. 4427.

Why though? Is she punished for something?

Guys, I know that topic encourages strong feelings for some of you, and that is exactly why I want to keep it open. So please, avoid snide comments and personal attacks from now on ;).

They're goony. It's not smart to live your life based on unsolvable paradoxes because...

Thanks everybody :D! And congratulations to Sam and Bad911 from me ;)!

Oops... It appears a mod cannot post after another... ignore this :P.

I think it's pretty obvious, Napalm. Just subtract 14 from his last post ;). 4454.

You have to admit there's something to it. A series had to put up with violent threats in the name of religion. So... It makes sense to get many more people to do the same thing that caused the threats, on a wider scale, with the intent of offending people. Yes, yes, a perfectly logical response. There is something to it. This isn't it. I think it's immature, don't get me wrong. I also think there's something to it. I don't see myself doing or encouraging anything like that, but can definitely understand where it's coming from.

You have to admit there's something to it. A series had to put up with violent threats in the name of religion.

Oh, you're a 10. You're definitely a 10. :rolleyes:

I don't want to pay taxes. But if I don't, I'll be jailed. That's just absurd! I just worded it wrong... What I meant was basically that a law requiring someone to watch something that would largely affect their emotions, whilst they have to make a rational decision, is absurd.

Better dead than *possibly* miserable? Your logic is messed up. Here's my first post on this thread: Why is it that pro-choice people fight against laws that require the mother to see an ultrasound of their child before they kill it? Isn't knowing your baby is a bit more than tissue, or a ball of cells critical in making an informed decision? The sad fact is that pro-"choice" people deliberately use language to muddy the waters. Its not a baby; its a ball of cells. Its not a child; its a bit of tissue. Why is it so shocking for some people to learn that abortion stops a beating heart? Any law requiring anyone to do something they do not want, is absurd. I'm all for ALLOWING women to watch it whenever, however, wherever. But having that REQUIRED? What?!

You do know this thread is called "Hot celebrities/models!! :) Post them here!!" and not "Hot female celebrities/models!! :) Post them here!!"... right?

Israel has nukes, but it's extremely unlikely that it would use 'em. Not only using them would ruin it's image anywhere that still looks at it's positive side, but it will also physically reach Israel. As in, hurt it. It's too small and too close to it's enemies to use it. OT: I think it's legitimate. A bit immature, but it's there to defend freedom vs. those who try to take it away, so I'm fine with it. *** By the way guys, better not turn it into a theist vs. atheist thread. There's another thread for that.

Have you personally had an abortion? I know several women who have had abortions, and let me tell you, all of them now regret it. I'm sorry, but I know two women who'se had abortions, one I even consider a very very close friend. Neither regrets the abortion part, both regret ever being pregnant. They both understand the outcome of having a child at this point of their lives (my close friend was 14 at the time, the other one was 21). Having that child won't only ruin the mothers' lives, but the childrens' lives aswell. Either way, and whatever the agenda towards abortion is, I don't think you (or anyone else for that matter) should have a say in whether abortions should be legal. The women who have them, decided to. They're probably well aware to the consequences, know what having an abortion means, know what not having an abortion means, and decide to have it anyway. Who are you to decide they should not?

Thanks a bunch :).

If it really is not much of a hassle, and if you do not mind... could you put all the quotes in the first thread so I could use Uzzisoft? I'd much appriciate it, and as you can see already have a new signature ;).

Looks like you'll agree with my position that abortion is always undesirable, in every circumstance. And in the act of abortion, a human dies. If you believe that, there's not much we can debate, because we're on the same page. I too think abortion is always undesirable. But I also think some of the time it's more desirable than not having an abortion.