Romy

Hey, can you see my house from up there on that high horse? Are you saying it's not wrong? Blah, blah, blah, hypocrisy, hypocrisy, hypocrisy. Evil-doings? Wrong? Terms used by people to feel better about themselves by faking empathy. Confession: I don't care about other folks' opinions. Mainly because they're wrong. incorrect. I'm thinking you're the one using terms in other to convince yourself it's okay. You call it "love"? On what account? As far as I'm concerned, most "fat girls" are inconfident- so you show some interest, "get laid", and walk away....yeah, that would do wonders to her confidence and self esteem. Not only that, but you do it so you could call yourself a "man". That's just preposterous. What's your point? It's cruel, it's disgusting, it's appaling, it's wrong, it's idiotic, and nothing can justify that. I hope I got my point across now...

It can be very attractive, you just have to know how to do it, and not over-do it.

Ignore that please.

Execuse my elaborated response, I just can't help it. Say what? The international media isn't biased at all, I constantly see it cover Israeli fallacies and the like. I even think the latest "important" issue, of the passports, was way over-covered, and quite frankly, biased against Israel- even though Israel didn't do anything the USA, England, Belgium and China wouldn't do, Israel just got caught and the media celebrated over it. Except many see it as legitimate, for some reason I'd never understand... I can't believe you even seriously said that... I can assure you peace is not out of reach for anyone who wants it with Israel, and I have evidence to support that- Jordan and Eygept. I'd like to remind you that the pact with Eygept was formed with a very-right-wing-ish government on Israel's side. Ther reason a dual-state is not a possibility is- The majority of the Palestinians is not interested in it, even if they claim otherwise. Netanyahu presented his terms for a dual state and these were completely dismissed without the opportunity for serious discussion. I can tell you from my own biased opinion that the Palsetinians are not even after that, if dual-states would ever be achieved, they will NOT be satisfied, they want Israel completely out of there, and you can quote me on that. I agree that the US has helped Israel countless times, but I assure you Israel went through serveral wars without definite support from the US, the most surprising one being the very first- Israel used practically CITIZENS to get through it, alongside weapons it bought from the Czech Republic (USA supported with some money, but nothing too serious), and Israel won with great success. Israel earned the right to establish through fair votes in the UN. With good reason may I add (I don't mean they don't want peace I mean that too many just DON'T want it). I can give you a shocking example here. A peace-wanting-arab that is the son of a "successful" Hamas leader, saw the much hatred on the Palestinian side, and saw it as unjust. He secretly joined the Israeli foces, and when discovered was wanted dead by his own father. Today the poor guy is heavily guarded by Israel with good reason- the second he gets free, he's dead. Sorry for your bad experiences. However, I don't see how that's relevant. Care to elaborate here? I assure you the illegal settlements could and can be stopped by the other side, if it would just agree to discuss ANYTHING without pre-made terms and conditions. It's not that simple, as described above. If you could come up with a brilliant solution I'd be more than thrilled to read it. That's even less simple, especially when some people still look at the Hamas as a genuinely legitimate organization. Couldn't agree more.

I think it's worse that they don't know what they're singing. A 14 year old jew that will be preached about Christianity, will probably not pay much attention to it, most likely completely dismiss it. But a 4-10 year old, repeating the same rhymes thanking God on a daily basis, could easily feel a contradiction later in life when he hears the oh, so inappropriate idea of God not existing, or of a different God existing. Says who? @Fakeitormaeit- with all due respect, you're definitely not respecting other posters when you say things like "Oh my ܩܕܝܫܛ ܐܠܚܐ (I said the "you know what" in my crazy foreign speak so that no one would be offended by "Its" name being imposed and shoved down their throat). You can probably tell my opinion by reading my first line. I find it incredibly foolish when people make such a big deal over hearing or their children hearing the word 'god'" Give me a break and don't twist the situation. A child witnessing and participating in such a "course", on a daily basis, HAS to be on the scale of either having some difficulties (small or big) dismissing the idea of God, or blindly following religion... unless, ofcourse, his parents are strict atheists, etc. You can't deny that.

Hey, can you see my house from up there on that high horse? Are you saying it's not wrong? Blah, blah, blah, hypocrisy, hypocrisy, hypocrisy. Evil-doings? Wrong? Terms used by people to feel better about themselves by faking empathy. Confession: I don't care about other folks' opinions. Mainly because they're wrong. incorrect. I'm thinking you're the one using terms in other to convince yourself it's okay. You call it "love"? On what account? As far as I'm concerned, most "fat girls" are inconfident- so you show some interest, "get laid", and walk away....yeah, that would do wonders to her confidence and self esteem. Not only that, but you do it so you could call yourself a "man". That's just preposterous.

Yeah, that happens to me too.

Fat girls need love, too. Don't you dare call your evil-doings love. It's disgracing and appalling.

Now you got me curious as to what you look like :P. I've posted pictures, but here: Wow, you really do look a lot like each other.... You literrally look like an older version of him.

I assure you atleast some of the children are brainwashed by repeating that. I know I was.

Now you got me curious as to what you look like :P.

That smuggler guy told me once that you may not be able to reach all rooms and shouldn't feel compelled to. I guess the reason is to give an incentive to level your skills, or benefit those who have.

Definitely. At least on my part- these are my thoughts exactly. I agree. This discussion isn't even between the whole of Tip.it anymore, but between Jagex and a few members which I shall not name. If I may, let me rephrase that. The issue is with Jagex. Some Tip.It'ers take good notice of that issue. Still, a large part of Tip.it is no longer participating in this rather controversial discussion. Don't get me wrong, I agreed with Tip.It's decision from the beginning. I just found the mere fact Jagex proposed forced such a thing, as extremely wrong and inappropriate.

Ofcourse children don't care. Children simply don't understand what's wrong with it, you can see plenty of examples for that on the childhood thread or whatever it was called. They're practically brainwashed when, on a daily basis, they thank their God. And no, it's not the same thing at all. One side of the scale is repeating statements over and over, and the other is just not doing that...

Not at all. Time it took to complete a floor does not affect how much exp you get. And as to the reason F2P experience was fast, is that completing dungeons took less time (and thus you got to complete more dungeons in less time- which is where the extra exp came from.) EDIT: Sorry for triple post, some posts caught my eye and I just answered them all on different tabs.

Seriously? You can bind 125 ammo AND a weapon? Can somebody confirm Definitely. On level 1 you can bind 1 item and up to 125 of (the same) ammo. The amount of ammo never changes, only the number of items. (ammo being runes/arrows.)

You are right, but hey this is one of the biggest thread in the forum now. Actually this is probably the fastest growing thread in tif history. I am a bit confuse here about binding. If you bind a weapon and then you quit the dungeon after finishing the floor and do something else(like gwd), will you lose the bound item? Also, is the lever room possible to do solo? No, you won't lose it, and yes, you can solo a lever room. The levels' timer is set to the number of players in the party when there are 5, it's about a second before it turns off, and when you solo, you have enough time (if you run) to tick them all.

Definitely. At least on my part- these are my thoughts exactly. I agree. This discussion isn't even between the whole of Tip.it anymore, but between Jagex and a few members which I shall not name. If I may, let me rephrase that. The issue is with Jagex. Some Tip.It'ers take good notice of that issue.

Could be both, I read it as "they have to".

I'm better than you because, as opposed to the statement you put under "location", I have a post above yours :).

Kind of long, but hilarous and creepy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VDvgL58h_Y

@ Dizzle & abc-

I believe this qualifies as OWNED. To be honest we should probably have a sub-forum/topic specifically for news. Good idea. I don't see it happening. However, if you find it important, you should post your idea here. Oh and guys, please stay on-topic :).

I do. They're basically forcing upon their minds God's existence. Whether he exists or not is irrelevant- bottom line is that they literally force them to believe so. This remided me of a quote of Dawkins. I don't remember the exact words, but he said that describing a child as Christian, Jewish, Muslim, etc, is like describing a child as Marxist and the like.

You mean news topics? I found it interesting, it's news, I posted it. If it bores you, I don't see why you should bother posting.