TheValeyard

Ironic since it seems that everyone knows the Wii has so far the best controls for Call of Duty. I think we should blame the creators of shooters. If CoD6 doescome out on the Wii, and even if it didnt, we all know it would use full-support of SD cards. The controls are different not superior. Whilst MW2 won't be on Wii, WaW 2 probably will and then there might be SD card support. The new Zombie map sounds interesting. Personally I hope they make a mystery perk box where you can get every perk in the game, rather than the limited selection on the asylum one.

It's the same on the other consoles, though I think the glitches have been fixed. At least the wii doesn't have tanks, which are also a pain in the [wagon] in terms of balance. http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/978/978423p1.html Posted this earlier but it seems to have been missed. Zombies in a swamp will be interesting, and hopefully they will lower the price of the first map pack.

:lol: And besides I meant it in relation to WaW, in that you shouldn't be complaining about the raw deal you get from Treyarch.

So recognise that this is not what the Wii was made for and don't complain about getting a raw deal when developers don't want to waste their time developing a game not suited for the Wii. Though Treyarch are pretty lazy anyway.

It was obvious from the start that WaW on Wii was going to be a massive failure. Treyarch were very, very slow to update even the 360 and PS3 versions. People going under the map on Roundhouse a month after the game was released with a beta on the map is just appalling. I was all for giving Treyarch a chance but they [bleep]ed that up.

What do you mean "anything to win"? The point of the game is to kill as many people as possible... In your perspective you have to leave some people alone and let them kill you to have fun? I think you're just a bit frustrated. If I had glitchers going under every map I'd be frustrated.

There are complications due to people skipping maps, eg you play Dome, the game chooses Makin, Makin gets skipped, then Dome comes up again. The lack of balance, patches, creativity, players per team, and the fact that Treyarch just dont give a damn.

Also putting on grip and steady aim gives the SAW the hip firing of an SMG.

The lack of balance on cod5 is game breaking.

I still dont understand why natures are better before 91. I'd rather make ~170 gp profit per ess rather than ~100, even if nats can be made faster. I can see that nats are better xp but if I wanted that i'd use that altar down near castle wars that I always forget the name of.

So do cosmics sell in bulk? Even at min. price I'd get more from than from 1 nature rune.

I've come back after a year away and found that nat crafting is now pretty bad money. I've got the level to craft double cosmics and figure that getting 2x 149gp is better than 1x 225 gp. The only flaw I can see in this is if people have stopped buying cosmics for some reason. Also I was planning on making 1k pure ess worth of cosmics, selling 1k cosmics to pay for the ess and then using the other 1k cosmics at the mage training arena. Is this still a good way to train magic or has something better been added since a year ago?

Well recoil does make a difference on certain guns like the Browning and bolt action snipers but on most guns its negligable. The MP40 does have quite high recoil but as it kills in like 2-3 shots by the time the gun starts to jump they're dead anyway. Recoil is more important in COD4.

No it just shows they depend upon shovelware.

How about no. Thats just overzealous and uncalled for. Recoil in COD terms is basically how far the gun goes up or down (or in some cases side to side as well) after each shot. eg. BAR has quite high recoil after 4-5 shots, but you can fire Gewher 43 as fast as you can without the sights moving at all.

It's not a lie. They make the money through software. They don't make the profit from the console they make the profit from people buying the games for the console. Sony and Microsoft make a loss on each console sold.

It sold more because it's cheap and marketed better than the other two. McDonald's sells more burgers than every other restaurant, does it mean they're really good? No, it's just cheap and marketed well. I already told Valeyard the same thing. Something more expensive (wow 50 dollars the xbox is more expensive by, I wonder why. maintenance *COUGH*) isnt better either. Something less marketed isnt better or worse either. Although Mcdonalds suck I agree >_> The point is the sales figures do not reflect the quality of the console.

Because they're desperate to squeeze out as much money as possible before being completely dominated by Modern Warfare 2.

Because Teyarch are a lazy developer.

Have there been ANY patches for the Wii since release? Also I found this. http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/978/978423p1.html Hopefully when its released they'll make the first map pack half price or something. As WaW competitive is pathetic I only want the zombie map.

Ive seen someone 1HKO a level 103 in fight pits. He was just standing there then this guy in Dharoks ran up and downed him with an 85

Tomb Raider. It's been dead to me for years.

Graphics are actually quite strong in that they are decent and dont require high reqs. I could run RS HD on my crappy old 128mb Geforce FX card. Whilst there has been recovery since December 10th, I dont thing the game will ever be as good as it was. Rs has become too sanitized and child friendly.

You should as long as you didn't PC or bandit it. Also take comfort in the fact that 99 str is actually useful unlike skills like firemaking that people max out then never touch again.

I know a guy who A. Had his 360 RROD 2 weeks after the Microsoft warranty expired B. Had his 360 RROD 2 days before Halo Wars came out after pre ordering the collectors edition