Hamtaro

@The Second Article There are currently ~13,800,295,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (13.8 nonillion or 13.8x1031) possible combinations of passwords between 5 to 20 digits. In my opinion, there is no shortage of passwords. With the 95 possible characters for a single digit you have suggested, this would become ~3,620,004,230,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (3.62 duodecillion or 3.62x1039). On the note of recovery questions, those should always be gibberish anyway. My favorite vacation spot may very well be frisbie1417shamrock9001tiger42, for example (it's not my answer, dw). I wouldn't mind if all those characters were to be added, but it's certainly not necessary if you have letters and numbers in at least a 10 digit password. Unless you have a keylogger, get phished, or tell your password to someone, it's highly unlikely you will be hacked. Overall, the article was an interesting read and I hope to see more articles from you in the future :smile:.

Thomas had so many great saves so far. The game could very well be even right now if it weren't for him. Also, Rome's hit was totally uncalled for. I hope Horton will be okay.

I wouldn't mind if drugs (at least marijuana) were to be legalized with regulations such as: -Sold exclusively by the government (others can be arrested) with maybe a 10-15% tax -Must be 19 to use (to try to keep it out of high schools, but lol that won't be followed) -Cannot be consumed in public places -A person causing a public disturbance (outside their own property, of course) while under the influence of drugs can be arrested for public intoxication -Cannot drive a motor vehicle on public roads while under the influence of drugs (maybe not for pot, IDK how that affects a person) -Companies still have the right to drug test and dismiss employees on drugs (maybe not for pot, so long as the employee isn't high while working) Some benefits? -Tax revenue (maybe to start paying off that national debt?) -Severely damage the drug cartels' power in Mexico (and American gangs) -Fewer people in prison leads to less of a burden on the tax payers -A person has less of a chance of being introduced to a more dangerous drug by a drug dealer, since they wouldn't have to visit one anymore I wouldn't personally want to try drugs, but whatever. Live your life the way you want to; you're the only one that has to die when it's time for you to die, so it doesn't affect me one bit (Jimi Hendrix :thumbup:).

My friend who does have 99 range (I obviously do not) really wants the Sagittarian longbow and wants to know the quickest way to get it (c1, small rush, more people, etc?). He also would like to know if prom chainbody or tyrannoleather top would be better. I have told him that range isn't so useful in Dung, but he's set on using range and these items. His stats are 70 Atk, 75 Str, 90 Def, 93 HP, 99 range, 52 pray, and 79 mage, 63 dung. Now, my question. I only train Dung with the same 2 people (we really hate playing with micromanagers and ragequitters). We are all the same Dung level (73 right now) and always on the same floor. What floors should we be rushing and which should we be doing c6 larges/mediums on? We don't need to hear that the strategies we use are inferior, inefficient, etc. We know... All advice is appreciated, but please just answer the questions. Thanks in advance :smile:.

It was one of the pictures provided to TIF this week. I thought it looked 'shopped at first, but I guess it's legit.

And another one...

grammer doesnt real but has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like for to dungeoneer?

RS Facebook (Français) I'm actually curious about an update for once. Hopefully it will be able to break the grind of Dungeoneering (inb4someone still argues this) and not force you to play with kids who try to micromanage you or ragequit over something insignificant. Too bad it won't happen. Maybe there will be a "bug" on the first day where the xp isn't horrible before they "patch" (read: nerf) it. Too bad I will be taking finals and won't benefit from the "bug" (read: intended xp rate before rants about nullifying "achievement" in a children's video game) <_<. Oh well, it will be an alternative one way or another, so I'm happy. inb4Dungeoneering argument derails thread

RS Facebook:

I missed this last time Van played: Tonight's game should be interesting. I like Tampa Bay better, but I think Boston would make a better final.

Ungrounded idea given it says the three hero npcs, Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen, we been told about ages ago will make their first appearance in-game AND wander around elsewhere. It doesn't even remotely imply the dg guys will wander off. I was more so referring to the fact that they look alike, not that they're the same person. Having not played for real since the bonus xp weekend, I think it was fair guess to make. Aside from the grammatical structure of the bts clearly indicating it referred to Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen; not the other names previously passed by... What? Did you even read my post? They're being introduced to the game for the first time meaning we've never seen them before. Unless you've seen Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen before, what you just said makes no sense in regards to my previous post. I clearly said they look alike, not exactly the same. ...and guess what? Pretty much everyone involved with Dung on Daemonheim looks alike. It would be very fair to assume that since the character in the picture looks similar to everyone else on Daemonheim, that this could be the update related to Dung. I can't believe I'm having this discussion. I was simply trying to justify why I thought it could have been the Dung update. You don't need to make an argument out of every trivial detail like every other thread. I won't reply to keep this pointless argument going, but come on now, this is literally arguing for the sake of arguing.

Ungrounded idea given it says the three hero npcs, Ariane, Ozan and Sir Owen, we been told about ages ago will make their first appearance in-game AND wander around elsewhere. It doesn't even remotely imply the dg guys will wander off. I was more so referring to the fact that they look alike, not that they're the same person. Having not played for real since the bonus xp weekend, I think it was fair guess to make.

Guess I was getting my hopes up too early. Not that it matters, but still. I assumed he kind of looked like Marmaros, considering each has the same paranoid expression on his face.

RS Facebook:

RS Facebook:

I had my tonsils removed against my will too as a child. I guess I had my human rights violated in the name of good health twice :(

Sorry that my cited sources weren't blog entries. Maybe this will make things better: [spoiler=Science]

Good job avoiding the question I asked multiple times in my post. Better change topic because you can say something without any logical meaning to it :thumbup: I read your previous posts. You repeat the same things over and over again, while I direct you to: The World Health Organization's thoughts on the subject: http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/MCrecommendations_en.pdf The Center for Disease Control and Prevention's thoughts: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm I know they're not so valid as opinion blogs, but I'll have to settle for them =/. Sure, circumcision is non-essential, but then by that logic, neither are vaccines. Guess what? Both increase your chance of not catching a disease! Maybe we should stop vaccinating people because some woman faked a disability after one (just like the supposed "psychological trauma" :rolleyes: that circumcision causes). I am yet to see a negative on the side of being circumcised Yeah, sexual pleasure is obviously super important (which is the same act where you're going to catch a disease more easily, especially if alcohol is involved, thus rendering that argument obsolete leaving nothing). It just seems like bitter anti-religious people who "have everything figured out" are hating on religion for no legitimate reason. Apparently, hating one religion makes you a bigot, but hating all of them makes you a rational thinker (spoiler alert: you're still a bigot). If you don't like the First Amendment, feel free to move to China where religion is nearly banned. Oh wait, that's why my great-grand parents left there... I must be brainwashed because I respect my parents enough to believe they wouldn't lie to me beyond Santa Claus. But, of course, you know for a fact that all religious people are brainwashed at birth, and you're obviously right. Sorry that I grew up in an effective household and ruined your laughable assumption :(. [spoiler=Slightly Off-Topic, but still a reply to your post]I have always loved the people who honestly believe all religious people are brainwashed. They kind of remind me of the creationists who are so solemnly convinced about their beliefs that they refuse to even listen to anything the other side has to say (in a sense, brainwashed). Why don't you take an opportunity to listen for the first time? Religion isn't about having imaginary friends in the sky or however you word it; it's about having a little faith. I know there is no scientific evidence to prove the existence of God and this doesn't bother me. I have faith that there is a meaning to life beyond reproduction. I have faith that people are inherently good. I have faith that there's more to life than our short window of time on Earth. If you don't feel that way, that's fine. I would never be able to live a life without any hope or feeling of guidance. If you think this is inherently illogical, you are not open-minded; don't pretend to be. The inherent good nature of mankind amidst wars and all other conflicts exists. If you close your mind to the good, you are a pessimist and will most likely live a miserable life hating everyone. Have a heart. People are by no means perfect and are not meant to be perfect. In the end, it's not what you did wrong that matters, but what you did to help your fellow man.

Feel free to get circumcised - I'm certainly stopping you. What I am supporting stopping is the human rights violation of nonconsensual medical practices. [1][2] If getting circumcised is such an essential and core aspect of your religious belief, surely there's no issue getting it done as of when you reach the age of consent and majority? :rolleyes: I'm perfectly happy with having it done as a baby. My parents certainly do have a right to encourage my religious beliefs (sorry for not being an awesome teen rebel who has to go against society). Being circumcised = no consequences. Not being circumcised but wanting to later = dangerous and painful. How is this difficult to understand? Where is the human rights violation? Where is it? Is it the part where there's no consequences or the part where it's painless as a child? [satire]Also, you should check out my blog @ my-opinions-are-obviously-facts.blogspot.com. I'm very bitter about religion because my parents tried to make me religious, but I'm such a cool rebel that I can go against the grain. Also, my community college philosophy professor said so, therefore I'm 100% right and thinking for myself (wait...)[/satire]

I couldn't help but laugh when I read "human rights violation." A painless and most likely beneficial procedure is literally the exact opposite of a human rights violation. The bill, on the other hand, is literally oppressing religion (Jews, Catholics, and several protestant denominations). 68 million Catholics and 6.5 million Jews alone add up to be nearly 25% of the country (that's in case a "small minority" doesn't count to you). Sorry, my great-grandparents didn't come to the United States for freedom of religion only to have nonsensical regulations placed on it. Jews and Catholics have been treated poorly enough in this country by racist and xenophobic whack jobs, and now the people who are supposedly "open-minded" are against us too :thumbup:. I don't have a problem if you aren't a member of my faith, but please don't regulate how we practice ours (inb4irrelavent jim jones reference). No wait this is San Fransisco and they are, in fact, just so progressive that the First Amendment actually expired for them (it was written on some worthless piece of scrap paper 220+ years ago, I mean come on :rolleyes: ). I am very glad that I'm circumcised because of the health benefits that it does provide. If they were "open-minded" and left the decision to me now, I would not even consider it because of the pain it would cause now. I would, however, be angry at my parents for not having me circumcised as an infant. Being Circumcised: No credible consequences with a likelihood of health benefits and painless as an infant Not being Circumcised: Painful if you want it later in life and possible health hindrances for sexually active persons (thus making the only argument for circumcision redundant anyway) ^Toughest choice ever. I probably just don't understand, though, because I don't, amirite? Edit: Had a pretty good analogy to abortion at first, but I guess we should start sugar coating everything because it might accidentally cause intelligent discussion.

What's wrong with it? I've had mine since '06 and it has always worked fine :unsure:.

RS Facebook:

Sharks played outstanding tonight, no question about that. Van/SJ should be a long series.

Howard = Nabokov? I wish.