irregardless, we know you are correcting a mistake. However it is in our minds almost surely a non-existent one. If I thought a mistake I was correcting was pervasive, but it really wasn't at all and hardly no one made it, and someone informed me nicely, I would appreciate that. the subjective values are important to be aware of because in some cases they overwhelm the quantifiable ones. Not always - sometimes gp/h analysis is very valuable, because people are trying to be efficient, but aren't being as efficient as they could be. But this is one such case where they are relevant. relevant not to the content of this thread, but to the size of the audience for which this thread is useful. how important the subjective values are determine how valuable the quantifiable ones are to people. == example: Most people who do not have a fire capes do not not have one because they are trying to be efficient, and think getting one would be a waste of time - most people don't have one because, in this case, the subjective negative values associated with it (past failures, poor internet connection, etc.) outweigh the positive, concrete xp/h value. Of course such people won't necessarily admit this. I feel like the situation is comparable for people who do not pick of bones/hides. (note: i don't want to get into a discussion about the merits of this analogy; i'm just trying to provide another example where correcting a mistake would not be very useful.). == ^ no one is raging. I feel like this is sort of a useful discussion (for the participants, and for people who may read the thread).