Ammako

It's an 07 Kuradal's dungeon.

Yeah because they go in your PoH bookcases

Worst idea in the world and it's awful that people keep suggesting it. Yay for saying that something is "the worst idea in the world" without actually saying *why* they think it's a bad idea! \:D/

Too bad there's no Banner carrier pet in OSRS.

Then yeah, if they specifically put a limit on burying bones, then the action bar bypassing this limit is probably bug abuse.

Doesn't help that due to Nintendo's poor advertising, many parents thought the Wii U was just the gamepad and that it was just an accessory for the Wii.

Buying defender update to make them work the same way as pre-EoC.

Buying whip 0gp

Especially the drag on tooth island spot.

If signet farming becomes even deader, then that would mean cheaper prices for keystones. While that would be the end of moneymaking at Rorarii, it would make it more viable for people to make their own ascensions since you could get more keys for less. Then again, chances are you might still be better off buying the Ascbows directly.

I would like you to explain why you consider it bug abuse, because I don't really see why. Because back then, we had no action bar, so for things like dropping fish, burying bones, etc. you had no choice but to do each of them one at a time separately. Then they add an action bar, even going as far as specifically giving us the ability to simply hold the key down in order to drop all of an inventory of items at once (even though spam clicking is faster), not sure why they would consider burying bones like that to be bug abuse if they don't consider dropping items that way to be bug abuse either. Besides, you're paying like 3-4 times as much for that kind of prayer exp/hour compared to simply using a Gilded altar :P

That is, if Jagex doesn't go and remove all charges off everyone's necklaces for no reason after a certain amount of time.

Am I balanced yet?

http://s149.photobucket.com/user/ixfd64/library/rs%20addicts?sort=3&page=1

If you spamclick that button on the action bar you can bury much faster than just holding down the key like that video shows.

Yeah this is the one I saw originally: I didn't know you had more though

But Oddish made his own set of dual Ascbows within two weeks or something :P

supure pures

Kinda like the time I was spam clicking the button on SoF and it glitched out, showed Blacksmith's helm as a prize but it disappared super quick and I got absolutely nothing + the spin got used up.

I don't leik your luck

totally cool

That's like saying I have half the profound decorative set and the solution to completing that content is to drop the two pieces I already have.

Well I wasn't saying that they failed, just that Nintendo were comparatively much less popular than the competition. In comparison, GB/C sold over 118 million, all GBA models sold over 81 million in total, the DS sold nearly 154 million. The only competitor still in the race at the time was Sony with the PSP, really. That did really well as well, however, with 80 million rounded up (so the DS line sold a bit less than twice as much as the PSP.) Then the 3DS already sold 43 million units (couldn't tell for the Vita unless I find the numbers, I had 9 million as of january 2013 but the 3DS' numbers were from March 2014) All that just to say Nintendo might as well switch the focus to handhelds 100%. I really like the Wii U's potential, but they really don't seem to be willing to actually make use of it. I mean, they showed a concept video of what Zelda on Wii U could look like (if you guys remember that Zelda trailer they made to show off what the system was capable of) and it looked stunning, then they end up releasing a sub-par HD re-release of Wind Waker, a Dynasty Warriors + Legend of Zelda mash up and a cel-shaded open-world Zelda. Now don't get me wrong I don't mind the cel-shaded look, but it would be really nice if we could have games with graphics that really push the system's capabilities, you know? Graphics isn't the most important part of games, sure, but if they have the possibility of making the graphics really good, but don't do it... I mean you could have the same game, same gameplay and everything, only difference being one has cartoony graphics and one has much more realistic and immersive HD graphics... People are used to super good graphics on PC and/or XBox/Playstation, if they look at the games on Wii U and don't see anything that catches their eyes they probably won't look any further into it, while if they had super good graphics they'd probably be more likely to investigate more, maybe take an interest in said game and eventually buy the system.

The Wii was a huge commercial success though, with over 101 million sales worldwide. Meanwhile, the N64 had 32 million sales worldwide. For comparison's sake, Sony's system at the time (the PS1) sold 102 million. And if we take this further, the GameCube sold 22 million worldwide, while the PS2 sold 153 million. They ARE currently failing hard with the Wii U though, I'll give you that.