Jump to content

Nazgul740

Members
  • Posts

    2013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nazgul740

  1. brighten the render so it looks like it is being highlighted or somesuch... and it would be teh sex... too flat atm though
  2. flat, anatomy issues, horrific clouds... You really really need linework help... :?
  3. OH gosh please no! i would have to give him a 5 then if he had those in his bank
  4. yeah, you can still hit high with 60+ defence. its not like a curse to stop all hits 25+. i constantly hit 26s with my whip and d scimmy in the duel arena. against barrows. i would say pures are good until 70 combat, when the defence starts to kick in. 1 def pures are just easy to kill in my eyes, i hit 26/26 dds spec, thats with quite a bad strength bonus. so...with there 1 def + my 75 attack, with 4 chances to hit double 26...there as good as dead. the first time i ever really members pked, i took d scimmy, full proselyte, dds...against a rune pure. my dds specs were: 17-0 23-0 24-0 23-0 and his specs were mostly 0s, i think he hit one double 9. ~~~Gudi~~~ Funny how when i fight people with barrows at 81 attack super potted and with prayer i rarely hit them... odd that you "constantly" hit them... you do know what that word means right :wall: So its my fault that higher levels have higher def? ~~~Gudi~~~ Don't use words you don't know the meaning of... :shame: Constantly Main Entry: always Part of Speech: adverb Definition: continually Synonyms: consistently, constantly, eternally, ever, everlastingly, evermore, for keeps, forever, forevermore, in perpetuum, invariably, perpetually, regularly, repeatedly, unceasingly, without exception Antonyms: at no time, never, temporarily Also, I did not say that i was fighting higher levels then me... I've lost to a level 85 when we both had whips+barrows... Pures aren't pointless i won 2mill in two days with one of my ranger pures at the dual arena... most people who are smart know that pures are a money drain unless they either have the skills to kill others consistantly aka-94+ mage/90 range or the stats to win most stakes... Pures can make a ton of cash if used correctly but almost all of the people who make them these days havn't ever pked and just think they can get rich out of a months easy work :roll:
  5. yeah, you can still hit high with 60+ defence. its not like a curse to stop all hits 25+. i constantly hit 26s with my whip and d scimmy in the duel arena. against barrows. i would say pures are good until 70 combat, when the defence starts to kick in. 1 def pures are just easy to kill in my eyes, i hit 26/26 dds spec, thats with quite a bad strength bonus. so...with there 1 def + my 75 attack, with 4 chances to hit double 26...there as good as dead. the first time i ever really members pked, i took d scimmy, full proselyte, dds...against a rune pure. my dds specs were: 17-0 23-0 24-0 23-0 and his specs were mostly 0s, i think he hit one double 9. ~~~Gudi~~~ Funny how when i fight people with barrows at 81 attack super potted and with prayer i rarely hit them... odd that you "constantly" hit them... you do know what that word means right :wall:
  6. :oops: I use a lens flare on another layer when brightening up a spot so i thought that might have been what you did and yeah the scattering (dunno what its really called) around him now makes it look better... I would a tad more through there maybe some jagged edges... Gah, i've sorta just been fiddleing around with ps myself so i don't know the names for any of this stuff :wall:
  7. I thought it was fun myself but the time spent didn't make up for the reward :(
  8. I would probably toned down the lens flare a tad... and the blending looks a bit... how would you say it gooey?
  9. wow the final came out very nice... I stopped going to alot of those types of conventions after guys starting hitting on me... :-s (yeah im a guy too) Just because somone likes to create costumes doesn't mean they aren't straight :( I think your outfit is pretty much dead on... Your friend's busterblade is also pretty darn sweet
  10. ehh i don't like the color of your render in there... I would of changed that a tad before popping it in there... That bg is purt though
  11. Ya i would change that if i were you.. purty bg though... got a tutorial or somthing that details how to make that kind or is it just skill... colors are really nice in the bg if you want to leave render i would color balance or hue change it to match better
  12. Ill take you on in a tech sig battle nadril \ After you finish this one of course.. just drop me a pm... I egerly await both of yalls sigs :D
  13. That start is teh suck.. And no, any attempt to try and create somthing that replaces buddies needs to be a few things A. able to fit more then one in a sig B. Easy to add onto C. looks decent D. Ease of use for people who want to create sigs Basically we don't have many people here who are that good at pixeling who would be willing to work on this... Eventually we would have a bunch of missmatched pieces, some of which are awsome and some that look like blobs of colors... So, NO just FLAMEING NO :x
  14. on that thing about abby pkers... i saw one dude attacking rc'ers... later that day he was rcing... I was like wtf? they just turn around and use the glories so i think most of them are fair game... I just wish there was some way to preserve pouches... :cry:
  15. So today i was killing green dragons with my standard 3 items and monkfish... I was taking a break from runecrafting after some twelve hundred natures... So i was relaxing and having a gander and a lvl 77 and 94 come up... Now i don't judge on people and such but this level 94 was using mithril armor a d-skim and no glory... After his first kill I promptly attacked him myself with my d-skim... Now he teleported after a few hits and the 77 that came with him asked why i had attacked him... I replied that he would slow down the dragons as it was an empty world with slow sprawns and 3 people there would be a pain to get full... The 77 gives me the expected reply of "omg, i can't believe you noob!" Now i'm wonder what yall think... Cons of my view: I take the risk of losing my items now I lose food if he hits or had poisoned me I might have to tele losing overall valuable time I could run out of prayer if i had been using a whip Pros of my view: I gain time If he had had items i might have gotten some Since i play with chat on hide or off i now don't risk the chance of being accused of being an auto'er when i don't talk His view: Its not nice I made a guy tele thus making him lose time --I can't think of more... y'all got any? So, I attacked some poor innocent trainer... should i be ashamed? Maybe, am I? Nah, i take the risk when i get a skull so in the same manner i reap the rewards when he teleports... Now obviously i could have been charming and social but since i only have one hour to play why would i spend my time talking to someone i don't know who will cut in half what i am able to accomplish... Anyway, what do yall think? Am i a mean haggott who hates on those poor skillers... or just a dedicated trainer myself who won't let another player stand in his way...
  16. why does your render smash right into the main piece on the right?
  17. same guy who made mediocre graphic sigs? Jeesh when you have talent like this in pixeling why bother? If it was the same guy... been away from forums for so long.. :-k #-o Your overall picture comes out looking nice... however its not alltogether relistic... it looks to be a personal style which heck is fine by me... but i would try and focus on keeping the main relistic qualities that make an image appear almost photographic
  18. I think that you should have lowered the saturation of the origanal render layer to about 50% to make it blend into the background... Up to you really just my opinion they don't flow together enough for my tastes
  19. Yeah you are probably right but! he could be useing different computers and loggin in his accounts all at once... you are allowed to do that unless they come in contact with each other... (which you said they did) He really could actually be playing all of them Still, probably not
  20. None taken... thats the type of sig it is... 8-) least so far as my tutorial showed me how to do
  21. mm i don't see how it would be "blurry" on my screen its about as crisp as a picture can get :S... what is your resolution at?
  22. Yeah my name is hell0lumby on there i think i will certianly take you up on that offer... don't worry :twisted:
  23. No i mean that people will say something like say... take the layer and click option 2 3 and 4 and then ill make a layer and there won't be any options... im sure cs can do everything that the others can its just the diffculty of finding the things i need to pop in there #-o
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.