InkofDeath

That was pretty good.

So many admins I've loved to see mod and/or post on here are gone. It makes me feel old on here. =S Ard, Trip, Sith, Albosky to name a few. Next generation of admins, for the win!

IWBTG is the most annoying, sadistic thing I've ever played. N is still pretty fun though, beat the 30 levels, and never got around to do the rest.

Basically that's what it's going to come down to. What forum mentality is going to win over the other. Giving Tip.It a leg-up, would be increasing it past 20, or what other communities have their time set at. Tip.It has the smallest time, Tip.It can still go to 10 minutes but it won't be a true advantage. As I've already explained I really don't think there's anything wrong with increasing the time, not out of personal preference, just out of speculation on how misleading the times are at 5 minutes, or 10 minutes, or higher.

Are you suggesting something for the forums, or did you mean to post this in Off-Topic? Your post completely confuses me. If you are suggesting something, maybe explain it better?

Besides the item database, and the 800 or so quests, then yes, but then again the information on AoC isn't all that interesting. The only interesting thing for anyone who has already gotten 75+, would be guide topics for Dungeon Raids... HoX > Sin in most cases, that darn AoE in the demon form...most annoying thing in the world. >.>

And I was only guessing when I was stating those numbers. Unless we find out how long the majority do take, as I was stating, it will always be speculated about. Even saying 'It doesn't take [/b]me X amount of time' is still not conveying whether or not it's true or false. though I don't really think a poll is going to be done just for this issue. And what is wrong with that, if I was correct in my previous post? We wouldn't be scamming anyone, and we'd probably get some form of 'latency' with the 'online' system. 5 minutes is good for a fast PM, but a lot of users re-appear on the forums after 2 minutes of refreshing the page, as it went from 72 users, to 50, to 74, to 80, 87, back down to 69. It was at 4am eastern when I did this. I've never really had that problem, but for a moderator/Admin it could have been annoying, for regular users, I doubt it, unless they are creating an event (TET), or discussing something in a forum topic (Some kind of player-event, or player-made 'game' topic, or picture topic). Anyways, simple fix is to have two different timers, 1 for 'Online', and 1 for 'who is online'. Would be much more flexible.

I see, I had a thought that this was the case for general cards anyways. Thanks though.

Basically 200 pictures were erased on a 1gig SD card. Does anyone have a few links to 'free' or such programs that could recover the lost data, or any tricks that any of you know of to recover any of them? I'm a little too weary about certain programs I found through Google, so if any of you know of any, it would be appreciated, as well as any other information. Thanks.

Frenzy stance? Your kidding? LOL, someone got cocky about being in a group...lol. DT would have been an easy kill anyways, just because you can manipulate their game play easily. Sin & guard would cause a lot of hassles depending on basic PvP skills. You got really lucky with that Fatality, if they had got their CC's...you probably would have died. @thesite: Yea, orange and black for the win. It's not very fancy or anything, but it has a good chunk of info, which is better than a fancy layout/design...lol.

Her point, or motivation to use such fluids, and then the 'theme' in which she is using is quite beautiful to read in theory, I want to say brilliant but not really. Regardless I don't think there's any other kind of fluid that can be used as paint that would fit her theme, or 'journal' as she discussed on the site. I think it's pretty cool and interesting to what she did.

What you're asking is Master & slave. Currently Local Disk (C:) is the Master, or default HDD. While Lenovo is the slave, or secondary HDD. Everything will be booted from Local Disk (C:), including the O/S, and any drivers you have, to my knowledge. I'm not sure but switching the Master & Slave can result in horrible problems, for you, and your computer. Switching them is done through BIOS & I think cords need to be changed physically. Anyways some guides, which you should read: http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial ... /43r01.asp http://www.techsupportforum.com/1211540-post3.html < -- A Post on a tech forum - May as well read the entire topic, it's relative to this in a way. Any others: http://www.google.ca/search?q=switching ... e=off&sa=2

Page two. :?

Nor do you have any obligation, or any need to pretend to anything of the opposite of those examples. IE; Tip.It has an/no obligation to make themselves look worse. Tip.It doesn't/shouldn't need to pretend it has less active users. Where does the line cross of being active? 15 minutes, you become inactive on the boards, but why? You were reading an interesting topic, or perhaps posting something, yet after 5 minutes only, you are taken off the list, even though you're clearly active, but not being recorded. Sure the 5 minutes would count as an 'actual number of activity', if you could record users not clicking, or interacting at all with the forums, except reading. But that's nearly impossible, and more or less impracticable. So where is this line that 5, or 10, or 15 minutes is showing unclear, or false activity? I'd give a bet 60% of users are taken off the 'Last Online', or 'Currently Online', at least 10-15 times per forum visit. Ridiculous, and I think the 5 minutes in this case, would be showing a false state of activity, for not recording those who are still active on the boards. It won't be under false pretenses if you look at what I typed above. Unless there's evidence that anyone who stops interacting with forum links for 5 minutes has clearly off-linked, or has closed their browser, or even just left the screen to sleep, then you can not say anything about false activity. Unless you can prove both authentic false, and true inactivity amongst users, then the only thing that is false is the current time for activity. Am I wrong? Does it not take the average user longer than 5 minutes to read through the first post, and say 1/2 of the rest of the topic? I know it does for me. Does it not take users more then 5 minutes to create a post, or even a topic? Yes, unless you have over 200 words per minute, which clearly isn't the case. So, why exactly are people calling 15 minutes inaccurate, or a false presentation of activity? If anything, 5 minutes is far more false/incorrect/inaccurate than 15 minutes is. Why? Because we spend most of our time reading. Not clicking. We spend more time typing as well, then clicking. Yet, which one of these actually contribute to activity being recorded? I'm speaking mainly about the majority of Off-Topic users, and about half of the General topics, and other forums probably a lot longer in terms of reading and replying as they are smaller, and have more detail, or content worth reading/posting about. Heck, with this, I can easily say 20 minutes is a better presentation of activity. But because the mentality is already saying 15 is ridiculous/false representation, we're not going to get 20, even though it's clear that 20 is far better than 15. Though I would say 30 minutes is extreme. There is no topic that the average user, on an average day, everyday, would spend 30 minutes on just reading or posting. The average time is probably between 10-15 minutes, each. You're not misleading. You are making yourselves look better, but not by making yourselves look larger, but giving a better accurate description of forum activity. Which, isn't misleading users, now is it? It's the opposite.

GREAT job both you & Peter. It wouldn't be half as what it was without what you contributed to this as well (and others, who worked behind the scenes). : Just because you're no longer an Admin doesn't mean you get no credit.

Anyone looking for an item database, and possibly a future Bestiary: www.doomdealer.com Very good FanSite. Though the item database currently only goes up to about 50-60, in due time it should be at 80 or 99% complete. These are Tradeskill items, or weapons, or armour, or generics, and quest items. So it has several uses. Plus you can submit your own items if they aren't in the database. In the future they are planning for a crafting area, and to get in sync with competitors of Feat Calcs, and zone areas (even though the zone area is done well).

One word: Tyranny.

The system looks interesting, hopefully it doesn't cause things like 'defending' and 'attacking' issues, like in Rs, non-skulled Vs those who do skull.

Paper Mario. Was amazing. :shock:

I'm currently 63, and it's crap trying to find a quest. The hell levels, 60 to 65. >.> When do the vast majority of quests in Thunder River and Atzel's become doable?

Might be using crafted gear. My 80 ToS only hits for like 1k :S. Not using gemmed gear is just asking to die. Also a non-gemmed ToS can hit up to 3k-4k at the moment because of an exploit, or I think it's the ToS, with lightning strike?

Ugh, I'm crashing every 20-30 minutes. >.>

You just confused the crap out of me. ToS are easy to kill if you get the first drop on the, if they get first stun...it can really go down the road from there. Well for an Assassin.

I find; Captain Falcon, Falco, Kirby, Bowser, and DK; To be really good in the Cruel brawl (that's the one where you fight 100 right?).

Privacy issues & concerns. Not everyone wants to be seen as online. Some people don't want to be disturbed by PM's. Not everyone wants to grab attention from users. It's a good feature for those who want choice. It's like as stated a 'cosmetic' addition of the forums. Servers no real great importance, yet to a minority it's either very useful, or a great treasure to them. Just because it has no purpose to the majority, doesn't mean people won't be using it. And as seeing as it is used, yet no negative repercussion, it's one of those little things that make a difference on the forums.