Striker6

dont follow advice from people on the internet that you dont know: 1)They're probably wrong 2)There are no consequences to there actions 3)No good comes out of screwing around with internet settings

I once got detention for printing off pictures of the-milky-bar-kid in class. The teacher was especially enraged because he looks exactly like the milky bar kid, and most students blantantly shouted out 'milky' across the classroom. So as a joke I print out a few pictures of him but he gives me the detention and not them. Btw if you didnt know: :lol:

lolol, the father, I mean what? 'I thought it was disgusting' you just know he ushered his son out of the room and got down to business.

Gerry Adams

Has anybody played battlemaster? http://battlemaster.org/ Really good game.

That is just STRANGE, what kind of college do you go to?

To be honest it looks quite boring. I mean the first one was great, it had a nice amount of humour to it and was *relatively* realistic. The second one I couldn't really take seriously, the characters weren't scary but dorky and unbelievable, as well as that captain that we thought was dead not actually being dead, I mean what? This third one looks bad, from the trailer-you know its a predictable movie, elizabeth will fall in love with (will?) and jack sparrow will somehow defeat all the bad guys in a comic and predictable fashion that we all got bored of in the first film. But i'll probably be coerced into watching it :notalk:

I think nudists are creepy to be honest, they tend not to be hot girls either but quite elderly, fat, unattractive people that want to get in touch with mother earth *shudders*

Dude....thats a chick car.

Hahaha, sounds like you find the baggy style rather erotic too. Yeah, must be one of the perks of being a police officer, if you're that way inclined anyway.

If you were referring to the "older, more experienced people" comment, I wasn't referring to myself or teenagers. I was referring to adults. In fact, I'd say that I'm in the "kids" category currently, as my life experience is minimal as well. So, thank you for the: " :roll: ", I appreciated it. The vast majority of people on this forum are teenagers which you know full well. According to your argument teenagers are more experienced in life meaning they apparently have a superior opinion. This is wrong because my argument is that teenagers are actually going through puberty which is messing with their hormones, and frame of mind, meaning that a 12 year olds opinion is actually more reliable as they aren't undergoing a serious amount of change. They have views and tend to stick to them. *Early teens. As far as I can tell, 18, 19 and even 17 year olds have no where near what you would call 'impared judgement' due to hormones. I'm happy to see any scientific studies you can come up with for your case, though. You need evidence to tell you that teenagers hormones clearly effect the way they think? I thought that was obvious.

I don't quite understand what you mean by this. We moderators never locked topics unless someone bumped it for no reason. For example, if someone posted something like, "lol" on a 2 year old thread, then it would get locked. If you had contributed to the topic, it shouldn't have been locked. Either way, the policy has now been changed so bumped topics will no longer be locked. If it was a pointless bump (like "lol," ":D," "cool"), then that post will simply be removed. If the 'bump' contributed to the thread, then it will remain unlocked and the post will stay. I still thinks its a cruel circle, you could argue by bumping an old topic you are restarting an old good topic which is benefiting the forum if anything. It would also prevent people from continually posting the same topics, bumping should be encouraged, not just left as Viktorkrum said but positively bumped by the mod that locked the said repeated topic.

I'd wouldn't speak to him, I would just beat the hell out of him to discourage him for wasting time on the game. I would probably be a better person without Runescape (as I no longer play) this is happening :)

Yes, I am sure the editor is running out of things to say :lol: Plus it will give him more time to write his articles.

Apparently if your mothers father was bald chances are you will be. I'm not sure if thats true but if it is I am safe \

Its like Prison Break, they're just stretching it as far as it will go because initially they think because its popular they can completely screw up the story line and people will stick with it. Well I don't :notalk:

If you were referring to the "older, more experienced people" comment, I wasn't referring to myself or teenagers. I was referring to adults. In fact, I'd say that I'm in the "kids" category currently, as my life experience is minimal as well. So, thank you for the: " :roll: ", I appreciated it. The vast majority of people on this forum are teenagers which you know full well. According to your argument teenagers are more experienced in life meaning they apparently have a superior opinion. This is wrong because my argument is that teenagers are actually going through puberty which is messing with their hormones, and frame of mind, meaning that a 12 year olds opinion is actually more reliable as they aren't undergoing a serious amount of change. They have views and tend to stick to them.

Do you value the surgeons opinion in a medical case, or a hobo's? Now, would you say their opinions are equal? Or would you say that the opinion of the surgeon is superior? Oh, and in case you were wondering, this is not a matter of which being is superior, but which person's opinion is superior/more valuable. Kids' opinions are of little value when compared to those of older, more experienced people (in matters not pertaining to the kids themselves, of course, i.e. a study on what kids like for a marketing company). Get used to it. Yes because teenagers are really well known for their clarity of thought =D> :roll:

Well, from what I have seen of his posts he doesn't do that, and besides you probably did that when you were that age so have a little more respect.

Here is another example of fat_hobbit22 damaging the argument simply by replying to a post. Seriously he is 12 and I already respect him more than you, you can't even be bothered to check your spelling and grammar. Your post is clearly just concentrating on one aspect, aggravating people. On another note, I think the discriminating is done mainly by 15-16 year olds that aren't really that more experienced in life themselves. Just don't tell people your age if it bothers you, nobody really needs to know.

You are a good supporting argument that GCSE's are getting easier and easier.

Fr33 y3110w ph/\t f0r m3z0rz pl0x0rs. joking, sorry to see you are quitting :boohoo:

Well why this thread is here I might just say something. Why is it that if you make a post that has already been done before the mods tell you to use the search button. You think ok, I've used the search button and found it now I'm going to add my two cents, oh its been locked for bumping old topics. Cruel circle anyone?

Depends which university you're looking at as to whether or not GCSE's matter. Well good point, but I didn't think they totalled up in UCAS points but I could be wrong.

If it helps, GCSE's mean zip all once you have A levels, its us you need to be worried about as we have university to contemplate :ohnoes: