munkis

Grats Se

hey remmember me? theres no bd around anymore last attempt was made by sport a while ago it was really the best clan around alot of members went too di but now theres no clan with any specific alot ammount of old bd think most quit Triumph through turmoil!

ggrats the and nice fought pkm

no but many expect them to whitraw to the 1967 limits or some even the 1949 limit the actual givin areas by the un if i remmember years right not good at that

boarder checkpoints isent indeed but the airspace and their water was an occupation then also remind that gaza isent a countrie most of palestine in the west bank is still occupied

hamas is extremly voilant but in geneve convention and un stuff all occupied people have the right to resist whitout being "terrorists" so hams is extremly voilent but they aint terrorists they are occupied citizens that is resisting the occupation power isreal

be apart in a socialist revolotion in any way posible

working ftw

or maybe simply expand the freedome FROM religon in usa ;)

i dont like cluster fights but this event has certainly made clan world a bit intresting again

you have a point but also dont forget someone who have never been in usa but have lots of friends from usa that have told u how it is living there alot during many years etc etc also gives quite a good picture of how it is living in a countrie specialy in "bigger pictures" like paying high tax for army while u get very little back and have to struggle for simple health care. the cultural diffrences etc are more hard understanding from stories so its not all lived there vs statistics its also other ways of learning about it ;) and amarican foreign policies are basicly imperialists when european empires crumbled in ww2 usa took over it not by marching armies everywhere like colonial eurpeans but mainly through economics and political pressure and if that dident work as last resorts war like vietnam iraq etc also someone mentioned earlier saddam killed 750'000? do people count the iraq iran war or what is that couse he dident "musterd gas" that many

drugs taking ur life is not about not working and going to school even if it seems like it it will be a chain it will take over ur life compltley and u will be a slave to the drugs and ur need for them...thats what they mean (the softer drugs are not this [cabbage] but they often lead to stronger stuff)

only time it worked was goldeneye the films based on games always sucked aswell not a video game but could runescape movie now be a new plan for jagex after the book #-o

bring back a serious discusion about socialism vs capitalism or as he said communism reformism vs revolotionarsm stop with the douche stuff it just redictulus....

u can already see effects from it right now hurricanes in carrabean that are longer seasons and records all very often heat in africa making it harder for people to grow the food etc etc im sure there more examples that bring death right now if this is made by humans? i think we are making the natrual phenomoman worse i mean all that pollution crap gotta do something right?

if u look at demand of old games it would be nes snes and n64 also they are amazing quality discs is not good at all #-o

mario is just wonderful he got a red hat sonic doesent ;) also from some experience platformers arent only popular amongs kids but also adults i think rpg and FPS is mainly teens :? not sure but maybe platformers are just popular amongs adults for nostalgia.. but the few 60 year olds ive seen gotten addicted to em cant be :lol:

nice fight 0 kills 4 death lol

No, "Palestine" was British territory, given to the Israelis to become Israel. As it was British land they could do what they want with it, and when it was granted to the Israelis (Given) it becomes Israeli owned land. Therefore they arent occupying the land, they're owning it. yes parts of it maybe but then in the war 1967 they occupied big areas including the golan area from syria and i think they occupied some more area some yaer after but not sure what year.. gaza strip was occupied from that war and until the year 2000 something not sure the date to the free gaza

apathy ignorence is atleast a bliss for the one with it nothing good with apathy what i can think off

I guess those are good points, but you have to remember Hamas doesn't have military targets. They do operate in a small area, and I say they're a terrorist organization, and fighting such an organization is like trying to beat dust, or insects. It just won't work. They operate in largely civilian areas, and have huge support thanks to disproportionate attacks. I can't comment on the Geneva convention, though - I know next to nothing about those points. theyre most support is from fatah being curropt PFLP lost alot of funding and prestige when soviet fell and then hamas came and started doing alot of sharity that is mostley why hamas is big and yes that is kidna the point of underground movements they are underground couse they cant compete with military targets just like the undergrounds in europe agianst nazi germany was the germans called em terrorists but few regard them as it now

i listen to alot of vinyl i usualy buy em on vinyl record markets that goes around and dont forget the awsome smell

What. So, a very cut-back (are they even still there?) occupation means the Palestinians can shoot all the rockets they want, at any target... But the Israelis cannot? Plus, are you serious about the blockades? Sure, it's a disproportionate attack, and sure, it will never have the hoped effect (basically telling hateful Muslim terrorists "[bleep] OFF"), but the Hamas certainly aren't making the lives of their people any better. I side with the civilians on both sides. Just stop the [cabbage] - abusing religion for power is ridiculous. im not the best on laws and stuff but yes hamas have the full right to shoot rockets all occupied people have the right to resist and its nto terrorism according to the geneve convention the isrealis can probs shot at military targets like hamas but isrealis are breaking alot og geneve convention rules and disproportionate attacks is in a un rule or the geneve too i dislike hamas alot they are ruining it for the palestininans but just couse they do doesent mean they dont have the same rights like the rest the funny part is just how much isreal liked hamas before 70's 80's i belived it was couse they were being a pain in the [wagon] for PLO :wall: now isreal got complete riligous nutcases to deal with

perfect dark although perfect dark was based on goldeneye like most modern FPS is ao goldeneye ftw multiplayer goldeneye was better though but like playing 2 players the single player thingy on PD

I call it a principle, you know, human compassion and all. I guess that's really what this whole debate boils down to. You either buy into society helping the needy, through actions or taxation, or you don't. I'm all for helping the needy but not in the ways mentioned so far, I'd much rather try to allocate a homeless person a space in rehab and a job prospect where willpower and determination is required to get through than just bail them out with them having nothing to do, no job prospect, no drug replacement as majority of the time they'll relapse. In another thread about communism/socialism, someone brought up the famous proverb - "Give a man a fish, you'll feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, you'll feed him for a lifetime." That's basically what should be applied here - Instead of simply handing out money and giving welfare to the poor and lower classes, teach and help them out of their situation. Now, some money to get them started would probably be helpful, but if you simply throw money at poor people you're not going to get anything done. yes i think marx or engels used that example once too as one of the better parts of socialism/communism since if u teach the man how to fish u lost a costumer while in socialsm u would want to teach the people all how to fish (metaphoricaly of course) That's the complete opposite though in terms of housing the homeless and providing the impoverished with welfare. Housing the homeless you will want to teach them "how to fish" as just giving them "fish" they will in turn only be a liability on society, same can be said for other groups who require welfare. Government's have nothing to gain by constantly throwing welfare to people, they'd gain much more getting them a job through taxation incomes. that is not oposite of what i said if so u missunderstood me english aint my native language im not the best at it but i agree with that 100% fighting unemployment is the most important of all and these people need a REAL job most of all