My New Car

[XdomX]

Why does everybody think when somebodys parents buy them their first car they're a spoiled brat? I mean it's not like a Corvette or something, its a car worth 7 grand, just because your parents spend around 7 grand on your FIRST CAR doesn't mean you a spoiled brat. :roll:

 

 

 

Actually.. Yea, it does.

[Randox]

I personaly prefer my cars non-american. I'd rather have a japanese car. Might have something to do with my parents preferance rubbing off on me but I have to admit, Infinity makes REALLY nice cars (Infinitys are the luxery versions of Niassan modes, like Accura is to Honda and so on). But if you got that car yourself congrats.

[Stoop111]

What happened to ever saying, "Oh, congrats on your new car Nanosauromo,"?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anywho, you're lucky you got a car, I dont know whats gonna happen when I'm looking for one, and tons of my freinds are still saving for theirs.

[look_its_rob]

runescapeloser22 wrote:

 

 

 

Why does everybody think when somebodys parents buy them their first car they're a spoiled brat? I mean it's not like a Corvette or something, its a car worth 7 grand, just because your parents spend around 7 grand on your FIRST CAR doesn't mean you a spoiled brat. Rolling Eyes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually.. Yea, it does.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How would you know if someone is a bratt just because their parents bought them a car? and if your parents get you a gift, that doesnt mean you are spoiled.

[Nanosauromo]

 

Why does everybody think when somebodys parents buy them their first car they're a spoiled brat? I mean it's not like a Corvette or something, its a car worth 7 grand, just because your parents spend around 7 grand on your FIRST CAR doesn't mean you a spoiled brat. :roll:

 

 

 

Actually.. Yea, it does.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That isn't true, but it doesn't matter, because I'm paying for this car myself.

[Led-Zeppelin]

Neither of your cars are really much to brag about. So shut the hell up, both of you. Specially the guy with the four banger old mans car.

 

 

 

And Tigra, there would be a wealth of four bangers that could tear your car apart, it's the size of a boat, power/weight ratio = crap, lol. You kinda jumped in with him on that whole argument and looked like just as much of a chump, lol.

 

 

 

You know what's hilarious? When people think weight matters SO much that no matter how powerful your car is, a much lighter car will always beat it.

 

 

 

*Snore* Stupid argument, and completely wrong.

 

 

 

As I stated before, my sister has a 4-banger Sunfire. It's small, weighs nothing and accelerates like a damn turtle. Seriously, driving my car and then driving her's, it's like night and day.

 

 

 

This crap applies to cars with around the same power, the lighter one will win. When the heavier car has TWICE the horsepower of the lighter car, the lighter car isn't going to win just on principle of being lighter.

 

 

 

The reason I find this so hilarious is because it isn't the first time I've heard someone use it as if they're some kind of expert. My friend has a 1970 Dodge Challenger with nearly 600hp, it's a freakin' monster, really. He'd race stupid 4-bangers all the time and they'd never stand a chance, even though the kids swore up and down that they'd win because their car was light and his weighed as much as a tank. Afterall, something made completely out of steel can't be fast, can it? The answer is; Uh, duh. Yes it can be.

 

 

 

So, if your car weighs 2,000 pounds and has 160hp, vs. a car that weighs 3,000 and has 300 something, you honestly think that 1,000 pounds is going to make the difference enough for the lil' 4-banger to win? Please. ANd I'm highly doubting the gap is even that big. My car doesn't weigh a lot. How you got that it's a "boat" is beyond me. My '67 Cougar is longer than my Grand Prix; and it's a coupe. It's registered as a "Sports car" and not a "boat" for a reason.

 

 

 

And I highly doubt I was the one who looked like a chump. I don't care how fast my stupid car is, I don't race it and I don't pretend to be a street racer like he does. I just wanted the other dude to know his car is a peice of crap and he shouldn't act like it's a Viper or something.

 

 

 

Good ol' Tigra shoving words in peoples mouths, yet he goes into flame-trooper mode when people do the same thing to him. :roll:

 

 

 

Did I ever say his 'light' car would beat yours? No I didn't, I've PMd you reguarding this, still awaiting your reply. (Or are you doing some research, as you've stated before, you really know nothing about cars?) :boohoo:

[Poopingman]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

[Tigra00]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

 

 

 

I'm aware it does matter, as I stated. What I said is that it doesn't matter THAT much, as in you're not going to beat someone just on weight principle, and linking me to an image of one car that may be an acception to that rule isn't going to prove me wrong, lol.

 

 

 

I don't respond to PM's, Led. Do you think you're THAT special? That I'd take extra time to PM you? Um, no. Besides that, you're still wrong. Oooo, you found one car that has nothing for horsepower and accelerates like a rocket (or whatever, I didn't even look at it) and you automatically think that means "Yes, any Honda Civic or Toyota Supra can kill any car, stock, because it's lighter." which was the original argument that dude made, and it's wrong.

[Outhit]

An avarage car nothing special. If you bought it your self then really good:P

[Led-Zeppelin]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

 

 

 

I'm aware it does matter, as I stated. What I said is that it doesn't matter THAT much, as in you're not going to beat someone just on weight principle, and linking me to an image of one car that may be an acception to that rule isn't going to prove me wrong, lol.

 

 

 

I don't respond to PM's, Led. Do you think you're THAT special? That I'd take extra time to PM you? Um, no. Besides that, you're still wrong. Oooo, you found one car that has nothing for horsepower and accelerates like a rocket (or whatever, I didn't even look at it) and you automatically think that means "Yes, any Honda Civic or Toyota Supra can kill any car, stock, because it's lighter." which was the original argument that dude made, and it's wrong.

 

 

 

Man I love when you shove words in peoples mouths, yet go into flame trooper mode when someone does the same to you.

 

 

 

Did I say that his 160hp car would beat yours? Um, no. Go back to school, do not pass go, do not collect $200. And yes, I must be that special as you replied exactly what you would have said in a PM, yay for dumb assness? I think the only reason you replied here is to make a spectacle and increase your e-cred. What a tool.

 

 

 

Pit a light car with less hp (not half, (I beleive this is dumb assness showing again?)) the match would be even, can you link me to a page with the stock stats of your car (HP, 1/4 Mile time and 0-60..) ya know, just for a laugh.

 

 

 

Any Honda Civic or any Supra can beat your car? Did I say that, no I didn't, get your fist full of words out of my mouth please. And a Supra isn't a four banger, like you said, you don't know much 'bout cars so you really don't have a leg to stand on in this arguement, peg leg maybe?

 

 

 

Supra = 3 litre, six cylander twin turbo stock, so yeah, not exactly a four banger? You fail.

[XdomX]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

 

 

 

I'm aware it does matter, as I stated. What I said is that it doesn't matter THAT much, as in you're not going to beat someone just on weight principle, and linking me to an image of one car that may be an acception to that rule isn't going to prove me wrong, lol.

 

 

 

I don't respond to PM's, Led. Do you think you're THAT special? That I'd take extra time to PM you? Um, no. Besides that, you're still wrong. Oooo, you found one car that has nothing for horsepower and accelerates like a rocket (or whatever, I didn't even look at it) and you automatically think that means "Yes, any Honda Civic or Toyota Supra can kill any car, stock, because it's lighter." which was the original argument that dude made, and it's wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supra = 3 litre, six cylander twin turbo stock, so yeah, not exactly a four banger? You fail.

 

Not every supra comes stock with the twin turbo. You Fail

[Led-Zeppelin]

It comes stock out of the factory with the option of twin turbos. I would have said STANDARD if I thought it was the bare minimum. You fail x2. Mmmm, need salt and pepper to eat your hat?

[martinisback]

Noob your father drop traded it to you.

 

 

 

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[monkeypie10]

Dude....you havbe no idea how many of those damn things I see on the road...they're like an infection that won't go away...good first car I guess but still....ugh...

 

 

 

HOLY CRAP. You should see Qatar with the Toyota Land Cruisers. Apparently, the "government" sais it's 1 out of every 6 cars in qatar.

[Tigra00]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

 

 

 

I'm aware it does matter, as I stated. What I said is that it doesn't matter THAT much, as in you're not going to beat someone just on weight principle, and linking me to an image of one car that may be an acception to that rule isn't going to prove me wrong, lol.

 

 

 

I don't respond to PM's, Led. Do you think you're THAT special? That I'd take extra time to PM you? Um, no. Besides that, you're still wrong. Oooo, you found one car that has nothing for horsepower and accelerates like a rocket (or whatever, I didn't even look at it) and you automatically think that means "Yes, any Honda Civic or Toyota Supra can kill any car, stock, because it's lighter." which was the original argument that dude made, and it's wrong.

 

 

 

Man I love when you shove words in peoples mouths, yet go into flame trooper mode when someone does the same to you.

 

 

 

Did I say that his 160hp car would beat yours? Um, no. Go back to school, do not pass go, do not collect $200. And yes, I must be that special as you replied exactly what you would have said in a PM, yay for dumb assness? I think the only reason you replied here is to make a spectacle and increase your e-cred. What a tool.

 

 

 

Pit a light car with less hp (not half, (I beleive this is dumb assness showing again?)) the match would be even, can you link me to a page with the stock stats of your car (HP, 1/4 Mile time and 0-60..) ya know, just for a laugh.

 

 

 

Any Honda Civic or any Supra can beat your car? Did I say that, no I didn't, get your fist full of words out of my mouth please. And a Supra isn't a four banger, like you said, you don't know much 'bout cars so you really don't have a leg to stand on in this arguement, peg leg maybe?

 

 

 

Supra = 3 litre, six cylander twin turbo stock, so yeah, not exactly a four banger? You fail.

 

 

 

It seems you're completely unaware of what the dude originally said in the first place, which was that his car would kill mine, or that any other random 4-banger "probably could". You agreed, stating that since they're lighter than my "boat", they'd do it easily. NOW you introduce the stipulation of "less HP, but not MUCH less"? Yeeeeea...Too bad that's NOT WHAT HE SAID, MORON. And it *is* what I said anyways. I said that if a car has less, but not much less, and weighs less, it'll win, but a car that has half the HP and weighs half as much isn't going to win just because it weighs less.

 

 

 

How do I "fail", exactly? You're the one here who seemingly cannot read or understand simple logic, and you try to cut me down because I used a Supra as an example of a [cabbage]ty ricer car when it isn't necessarily that [cabbage]ty? I know Supra's are nice cars, but I couldn't think of any other car ricers worship at the time.

 

 

 

I do believe you're the one "failing" here...Most likely "English" or "Reading".

[Chris]

I'd dry hump that Lancer...

 

 

 

Still, prefer the look of the Evo IX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And before anyone complains about my choice in cars. I'm European and I drive this pile of [cabbage].

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vauxhall Calibra 16V Ecotec = 136BHP brand new... It's about 12 - 13 years old. So if I'm lucky it puts out about 90BHP because I've damaged the engine. ^-^;

[underu2000]

My nonexistant car pwns yours!

 

Otherwise, cool.

[SuziAngel]

My car had her 2nd birthday yesterday. : She's a Peugeot 206 with about 60hp that could like, totally pwn a snail.

[Chris]

My car had her 2nd birthday yesterday. : She's a Peugeot 206 with about 60hp that could like, totally pwn a snail.

 

 

 

<3 206's. Although I'd prefer a GTi. :P

[Poopingman]

I'd dry hump that Lancer...

 

 

 

Still, prefer the look of the Evo IX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And before anyone complains about my choice in cars. I'm European and I drive this pile of [cabbage].

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vauxhall Calibra 16V Ecotec = 136BHP brand new... It's about 12 - 13 years old. So if I'm lucky it puts out about 90BHP because I've damaged the engine. ^-^;

 

 

 

Evos or bust IMO. Definitely a nice car.

 

 

 

Did you know, studies show that 94% of people who drive Evos are tools?

[Led-Zeppelin]

[hide]

Actually weight matters. But power matters more.

 

 

 

I'm aware it does matter, as I stated. What I said is that it doesn't matter THAT much, as in you're not going to beat someone just on weight principle, and linking me to an image of one car that may be an acception to that rule isn't going to prove me wrong, lol.

 

 

 

I don't respond to PM's, Led. Do you think you're THAT special? That I'd take extra time to PM you? Um, no. Besides that, you're still wrong. Oooo, you found one car that has nothing for horsepower and accelerates like a rocket (or whatever, I didn't even look at it) and you automatically think that means "Yes, any Honda Civic or Toyota Supra can kill any car, stock, because it's lighter." which was the original argument that dude made, and it's wrong.

 

 

 

Man I love when you shove words in peoples mouths, yet go into flame trooper mode when someone does the same to you.

 

 

 

Did I say that his 160hp car would beat yours? Um, no. Go back to school, do not pass go, do not collect $200. And yes, I must be that special as you replied exactly what you would have said in a PM, yay for dumb assness? I think the only reason you replied here is to make a spectacle and increase your e-cred. What a tool.

 

 

 

Pit a light car with less hp (not half, (I beleive this is dumb assness showing again?)) the match would be even, can you link me to a page with the stock stats of your car (HP, 1/4 Mile time and 0-60..) ya know, just for a laugh.

 

 

 

Any Honda Civic or any Supra can beat your car? Did I say that, no I didn't, get your fist full of words out of my mouth please. And a Supra isn't a four banger, like you said, you don't know much 'bout cars so you really don't have a leg to stand on in this arguement, peg leg maybe?

 

 

 

Supra = 3 litre, six cylander twin turbo stock, so yeah, not exactly a four banger? You fail.

 

 

 

It seems you're completely unaware of what the dude originally said in the first place, which was that his car would kill mine, or that any other random 4-banger "probably could". You agreed, stating that since they're lighter than my "boat", they'd do it easily. NOW you introduce the stipulation of "less HP, but not MUCH less"? Yeeeeea...Too bad that's NOT WHAT HE SAID, MORON. And it *is* what I said anyways. I said that if a car has less, but not much less, and weighs less, it'll win, but a car that has half the HP and weighs half as much isn't going to win just because it weighs less.

 

 

 

How do I "fail", exactly? You're the one here who seemingly cannot read or understand simple logic, and you try to cut me down because I used a Supra as an example of a [cabbage] ricer car when it isn't necessarily that [cabbage]? I know Supra's are nice cars, but I couldn't think of any other car ricers worship at the time.

 

 

 

I do believe you're the one "failing" here...Most likely "English" or "Reading".

[/hide]

 

 

 

I never said his car would beat yours, I never agreed with him, if you'd go back to school and learn some basic reading you'd of noticed I said; "Both of your cars blow, so shut the hell up". Did I not? Yours for the fact its as big as a boat, and couldn't manourver corners any better then a palsy victim doing brain surgery. And his for the fact its an old mans car?

 

 

 

I was just laughing at you two bickering over your cars whilst yes, yours is the better looking and faster car of the two, it's still nothing special, as you were making it out to be "OMgz n0 4 banger can beat my car LOPLZ!".

 

 

 

I'm by no means a ricer, so don't lump me in that category, as I obviously haven't been bragging about "phat rimzzz yo or body kits and sunroof" :lol: . (I lol'd when he said that).

[Poopingman]

 

 

 

I'm by no means a ricer, so don't lump me in that category, as I obviously haven't been bragging about "phat rimzzz yo or body kits and sunroof" :lol: . (I lol'd when he said that).

 

 

 

Theres more to being a ricer than that, a lot of it is dependent on the driver's mindset.

[chiknstu]

I personally prefer Corvettes, but gratulations anyways :)

 

 

 

this is his first car... wouldn't we all prefer a 'Vette

 

 

 

as for my first car... even though i can't really drive it would be my dad's old karman ghia or his toyota camry...

 

i missed out on the whole get a job thing this year so i'll just bum my way around muahaha

[Led-Zeppelin]

 

 

 

I'm by no means a ricer, so don't lump me in that category, as I obviously haven't been bragging about "phat rimzzz yo or body kits and sunroof" :lol: . (I lol'd when he said that).

 

 

 

Theres more to being a ricer than that, a lot of it is dependent on the driver's mindset.

 

 

 

I've only ever raced my car a few times, out at the legal drags, does that make me a ricer?

[____]

this is his first car... wouldn't we all prefer a 'Vette

 

Only if you like street cars. I used to, then I got smart and realised their potenital stoped at the end of the bitumen; unless it was a rally-grade vehicle... in which case it's not a legal road vehicle :P