DK BoB

[Donkeykong23]

 

 

 

:arrow: Good? Bad?

[O_M_G_Guasto]

I like it, twice what I got.

 

 

 

10/10

[Xanotex]

Good melee armour and a nice cashpile to complete any goal you might set;

 

has about everything you need in my opinion.

 

 

 

9/10 because everything can improve. ;)

[Itsjustagame]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

I swear if one more < lvl 110 kid asks me my strength level when Im using a whip, I'm going to blow up the internet.

 

 

 

oh, 8/10

 

get a DFS :thumbup:

[meb]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

 

 

 

No, it's proof that +4 strength is much more useful than +4 to attack.

 

 

 

Nice bank, nothing out of the ordinary though. Get a rare skillcape or something, and a godsword. Every bank needs a godsword 8-) .

[Donkeykong23]

I had a DFS, but sold it because I'm training strength.

 

 

 

I probably should have kept it, it's rising.. :-k

[Itsjustagame]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

 

 

 

No, it's proof that +4 strength is much more useful than +4 to attack.

 

 

 

Nice bank, nothing out of the ordinary though. Get a rare skillcape or something, and a godsword. Every bank needs a godsword 8-) .

 

Not at all.

 

Being more accurate is sometimes better than being stronger.

 

 

 

Would you rather use a sniper rifle or an RPG to shoot a target a few hundred meters away?

[O_M_G_Guasto]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

I swear if one more < lvl 110 kid asks me my strength level when Im using a whip, I'm going to blow up the internet.

 

 

Reported for cyber terrorism.

[mario_sunny]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

 

 

 

No, it's proof that +4 strength is much more useful than +4 to attack.

 

 

 

Nice bank, nothing out of the ordinary though. Get a rare skillcape or something, and a godsword. Every bank needs a godsword 8-) .

 

Not at all.

 

Being more accurate is sometimes better than being stronger.

 

 

 

Would you rather use a sniper rifle or an RPG to shoot a target a few hundred meters away?

 

 

 

Acuracy bonuses do not count as much as strength bonuses. The berserker ring is better than warriors if you tested exp per hour.

 

 

 

Nice bank by the way. :D

[Inuashakent]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

 

 

 

No, it's proof that +4 strength is much more useful than +4 to attack.

 

 

 

Nice bank, nothing out of the ordinary though. Get a rare skillcape or something, and a godsword. Every bank needs a godsword 8-) .

 

Not at all.

 

Being more accurate is sometimes better than being stronger.

 

 

 

Would you rather use a sniper rifle or an RPG to shoot a target a few hundred meters away?

 

Experience rates prove you an idiot.

[Itsjustagame]

Warrior ring - 92k

 

Berserker ring - 1.4 mil

 

 

 

^^ Proof that this game is turning into Strength-noob central.

 

 

 

 

No, it's proof that +4 strength is much more useful than +4 to attack.

 

 

 

Nice bank, nothing out of the ordinary though. Get a rare skillcape or something, and a godsword. Every bank needs a godsword 8-) .

 

Not at all.

 

Being more accurate is sometimes better than being stronger.

 

 

 

Would you rather use a sniper rifle or an RPG to shoot a target a few hundred meters away?

 

Experience rates prove you an idiot.

 

your grammar proves you're an idiot.

 

Did I say anything about exp/hr?

 

Point that part out for me, please?

 

 

 

Though, I am pretty sure I said this:

 

Being more accurate is ****sometimes**** better than being stronger.

 

Imagine that, eh?

[Bauke]

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There.

 

 

 

Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

[Itsjustagame]

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There.

 

 

 

Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

 

How am I wrong?

 

When fighting something with high defense, accuracy to chip away at hp more often is better opposed to a string of 0s and a high hit here and there.

 

Someone fighting with melee in say, Godwars, may benefit more from a warrior ring because of the slash bonus if using a whip.

 

A staker with high defense and attack with low strength will benefit more from a warrior ring than a berserker ring.

 

 

 

There are uses for both rings.

 

All I said is that the berserker is worth SO much more is because everyone is obsessed with strength these days. You can't train combat anywhere anymore without being asked your strength level. (unless you're maxed melee...then the person asking you is a moron).

 

 

 

Bandos armor is another good example. The defensive stats are below most if not all the barrows melee sets, but it's valued at so much more because of the strength bonus.

 

 

 

A seers ring is in the 50k's, and an archers ring falls a little below 400k. Both have uses where a berserker ring would be foolish to use, but both fall WAY below it in price.

[SirHartlar]

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There.

 

 

 

Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

 

How am I wrong?

 

When fighting something with high defense, accuracy to chip away at hp more often is better opposed to a string of 0s and a high hit here and there.

 

Someone fighting with melee in say, Godwars, may benefit more from a warrior ring because of the slash bonus if using a whip.

 

A staker with high defense and attack with low strength will benefit more from a warrior ring than a berserker ring.

 

 

 

There are uses for both rings.

 

All I said is that the berserker is worth SO much more is because everyone is obsessed with strength these days. You can't train combat anywhere anymore without being asked your strength level. (unless you're maxed melee...then the person asking you is a moron).

 

 

 

Bandos armor is another good example. The defensive stats are below most if not all the barrows melee sets, but it's valued at so much more because of the strength bonus.

 

 

 

A seers ring is in the 50k's, and an archers ring falls a little below 400k. Both have uses where a berserker ring would be foolish to use, but both fall WAY below it in price.

 

 

 

It's just a game.

 

 

 

Nice BoB, you should think about investing that 20M into something special. :)

[DanDuke]

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There.

 

 

 

Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

 

How am I wrong?

 

When fighting something with high defense, accuracy to chip away at hp more often is better opposed to a string of 0s and a high hit here and there.

 

Someone fighting with melee in say, Godwars, may benefit more from a warrior ring because of the slash bonus if using a whip.

 

A staker with high defense and attack with low strength will benefit more from a warrior ring than a berserker ring.

 

 

 

There are uses for both rings.

 

All I said is that the berserker is worth SO much more is because everyone is obsessed with strength these days. You can't train combat anywhere anymore without being asked your strength level. (unless you're maxed melee...then the person asking you is a moron).

 

 

 

Bandos armor is another good example. The defensive stats are below most if not all the barrows melee sets, but it's valued at so much more because of the strength bonus.

 

 

 

A seers ring is in the 50k's, and an archers ring falls a little below 400k. Both have uses where a berserker ring would be foolish to use, but both fall WAY below it in price.

 

 

 

It's just a game, and they're just rings with different bonuses. Nothing to go crazy about.

 

 

 

8.5/10 for BoB, I like it. I'm more combat-oriented as well.

[Bauke]

That's quite a meaningless thing to say. You were simply wrong about the rings. There.

 

 

 

Edit: Oh, and decent'ish bank.

 

How am I wrong?

 

When fighting something with high defense, accuracy to chip away at hp more often is better opposed to a string of 0s and a high hit here and there.

 

Someone fighting with melee in say, Godwars, may benefit more from a warrior ring because of the slash bonus if using a whip.

 

A staker with high defense and attack with low strength will benefit more from a warrior ring than a berserker ring.

 

 

 

There are uses for both rings.

 

All I said is that the berserker is worth SO much more is because everyone is obsessed with strength these days. You can't train combat anywhere anymore without being asked your strength level. (unless you're maxed melee...then the person asking you is a moron).

 

 

 

Bandos armor is another good example. The defensive stats are below most if not all the barrows melee sets, but it's valued at so much more because of the strength bonus.

 

 

 

A seers ring is in the 50k's, and an archers ring falls a little below 400k. Both have uses where a berserker ring would be foolish to use, but both fall WAY below it in price.

 

Strength is overrated, yes. But when it comes to xp rates in training, then you're better off using a berserker. I think that's what inuashakent tried to say (since he talked about xp rates and all). The statement of "accuracy is sometimes better" is far too generalized to be applicable on the xp rates that both rings give.

 

 

 

Anyways, on the scale of offtopicness, I rate this thread a 9 :thumbup: