Take your failed trolling back to /b/ where you belong.
You call me a troll, then go on to cite Wikipedia? Well played son, well played. If you were at least half serious, you would've instead cited the DSM-IV. The FBI definition regards 13 or under, and yet, you are still calling him a pedophile. I'm curious as to where:-
a) You've found details pertaining to the age of the 'victims' in question (I dont like the word victim, but we'll roll with it)
b) Linked distribution with sexual interest in children.
c) Found information which proves he was diagnosed a pedophile (as is the standard) by a psychiatrist
Technically being labeled a pedophile is a psychiatric diagnosis that can be made
only by qualified psychologists or psychiatrists. For many, therefore, the word is a diagnostic term, not a legal one.
And as a matter of semantics, 13 year olds are actually considered to be adolescents, not children. So the wiki article is slightly off-base.
Adolescence is considered to be the period between ages 13 and 19. The adolescent experiences not only physical growth and change, but also emotional, psychological, social, and mental change and growth.