sweetdeal7777 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Now this means a world in which both members and non-members can play in. Members can use their skills, their members items, non-members can't. And in the wild, ANYTHING goes. I think this would give us a good idea of who would win the TRUE f2p vs. p2p battle. Also it would be interesting I think. So write your name down if you agree. Petition List 1. Sweetdeal7777 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetdeal7777 Posted June 30, 2006 Author Share Posted June 30, 2006 :cry: I thought it could work :( Imagine the wilderness! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoteman Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 whats the point? No. "A disbelief in magic can force some poor souls into believing in authority and business" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Imagine the wilderness! I did. Hence my answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaerehw14 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 ok, imagine the wilderness. people in full rune with scimitars trying to fight pures with ancients. bad idea, im sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxicologist Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 I think the poster is a member who keeps getting owned in the Members and Free Player's Wilderness. That's why he made this idea: so that he could taste some victory for once. Of course, that is just me. Besides, putting yourself on Support is rather lame too. Why do you resist? My experiments are only helping humanity push the boundaries of the Art of Toxicology... you should be proud to be one of my victims. ~Toxicologist~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 ok, imagine the wilderness. people in full rune with scimitars trying to fight pures with ancients. bad idea, im sorry. Not to mention that if a free player pk'd a member, he would be stuck with a bunch of items he or she has no use for (cant use, cant sell, cant do anything). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaerehw14 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 ok, imagine the wilderness. people in full rune with scimitars trying to fight pures with ancients. bad idea, im sorry. Not to mention that if a free player pk'd a member, he would be stuck with a bunch of items he or she has no use for (cant use, cant sell, cant do anything). exactly. when i was level 50 ish, i had just gotten my 5th set of full rune (go figure -.-) after dieing in the wild and pked a member with all member stuff on. i had no idea what the stuff was, but it looked cool. (it turned out to be junk). well i pked them. they lost their stuff. i got nothing. yay. i guess people could pick up the runes from the ancienters if they got within 1sq to attack them anyway. ::EDIT:: ohh, and think of the begging! people would be tyring for hours to get on that world with members just to ask them for "phr33 gee pee pl0x" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexek Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Bad idea. That would have many bugs and would use the time Jagex could be spending wisely to do something such as make a new skill or some new items. :D Nice to see that you have a good imagination though. PoetryIndexed Picture 1Indexed Picture 2 Killed my maxed Zerker pure April 2010 Rebooting Runescape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxicologist Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Good imagination? I suppose he is imagining how he is using members items to own all the free players out there, as he can't PK anyone in members or free player worlds. Why do you resist? My experiments are only helping humanity push the boundaries of the Art of Toxicology... you should be proud to be one of my victims. ~Toxicologist~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scars Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 That idea is so not happening. Good luck with adding people to that petition list other than yourself.You might find a few like you maybe. :shame: Thanks to WithTheQuickness for the sig! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyrant_iv Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 the only thing good about your post (sweetdeal777)as far as f2p are concirned is that they can wonder in amazement just how your avatar came 2 be? (50000 santa hats, wats going on there?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizard_1315 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Rune armour vs. Dragon Armour? Lvl 50 - 80 vs. lvls 126? Don't think so Every path you have trod, through wilderness and through war, has led to this road... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxicologist Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 There are level 126 F2P players out there, you know. But Rune Armour VS. Barrows? Fire Blast VS. Ice Barrage? Adamant Arrows on Maple Bows VS. Magic Short Bows with Specials? No thanks. Why do you resist? My experiments are only helping humanity push the boundaries of the Art of Toxicology... you should be proud to be one of my victims. ~Toxicologist~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willyhenriksen Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 More humilitaion for F2P? Show them what they don't get? Absolutely not. R.I.P. Shiva and Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwrm22 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 p2p is to overpowered for f2p... and it will just ruin f2p... cuz if a f2p kills a p2p he wont get the stuff they drop cuz its p2p... ^^ click my sig for my lesser ranging guide ^^jwrm22: 4816th > 99 cooking 100% f2p !1172 total! + 140mil in items.i dont play anymore... i think rs is ruined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetdeal7777 Posted June 30, 2006 Author Share Posted June 30, 2006 Wow, I get an idea, feel that I wish to share it, and everybody flames me for it...sheesh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drone243 Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 bad idea its just like going in the wild to get killed on purpose if ur f2p :shame: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 There are level 126 F2P players out there, you know. But Rune Armour VS. Barrows? Fire Blast VS. Ice Barrage? Adamant Arrows on Maple Bows VS. Magic Short Bows with Specials? No thanks. There aren't any level 126 free players (that werent previously members). The highest is 124, if I recall correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minoture Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 Bad IDea, I agree with the majority of people that posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosco Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 ya what everyone said... except for the guy that posted this topic \ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fshiu Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 There are level 126 F2P players out there, you know. But Rune Armour VS. Barrows? Fire Blast VS. Ice Barrage? Adamant Arrows on Maple Bows VS. Magic Short Bows with Specials? No thanks. There aren't any level 126 free players (that werent previously members). The highest is 124, if I recall correctly. I thought Franzk was 125 [sig too big, don't do it again] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwrm22 Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 There are level 126 F2P players out there, you know. But Rune Armour VS. Barrows? Fire Blast VS. Ice Barrage? Adamant Arrows on Maple Bows VS. Magic Short Bows with Specials? No thanks. There aren't any level 126 free players (that werent previously members). The highest is 124, if I recall correctly. I thought Franzk was 125 ya... hes a big no-lifer... cuz he only needs 1 more prayer for 126... thats about 700k bigbones burried. :shock: thats near the same time as 150mil fm exp... ^^ click my sig for my lesser ranging guide ^^jwrm22: 4816th > 99 cooking 100% f2p !1172 total! + 140mil in items.i dont play anymore... i think rs is ruined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E_D_G_E_1039 Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 There are level 126 F2P players out there, you know. But Rune Armour VS. Barrows? Fire Blast VS. Ice Barrage? Adamant Arrows on Maple Bows VS. Magic Short Bows with Specials? No thanks. There aren't any level 126 free players (that werent previously members). The highest is 124, if I recall correctly. I thought Franzk was 125 ya... hes a big no-lifer... cuz he only needs 1 more prayer for 126... thats about 700k bigbones burried. :shock: thats near the same time as 150mil fm exp... I clearly didnt recall correctly :lol: But my point was there are no f2p 126's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now