October 23, 200619 yr Well I'll keep updating as I make them, I'll try to update once a week hopefully, so keep checking back :thumbsup: and you can check out all my work at my Website Some of my recent sigs My latest and greatest I rly like this one, tried adding depth i dont know if i got it right but i tried and hurray no dots!!! Updated angel (no scanlines) Two I made for the same person (sorry, i think i'm addicted to dots :-$ ) Two avatars I made for the same person Here this is a pixel avvatar I made a while back i'll slap it on here \ Used one of the same renders as last time, but this onewas for someone else And thats all for this time So tell me what you think ..:: Qwality ~~-
October 24, 200619 yr Yah, the 2nd, 4th and your signature are the best IMO. It blends together better than the rest. The scanlines on the first kinda ruined it (like you said) because it takes away the colour quality. But for the third one, I'm not liking the scanlines at the top right corner and the text is alittle, ums...messy? It's just me :XD: nice work :thumbsup: .: Gallery :. Away :( -cheers all!
October 24, 200619 yr The 2nd one looks really good Nice work :D Respect- Oy_the_Great, Lode, Bubsa, Weezcake, Thrash111, Gloric, Vmser, Pianofrieak2, Runemetsa Sigs Made By - Pink
October 24, 200619 yr Author ty everyone :thumbsup: , glad you all like them, and on the third one, the text is a little sloppy because like i said, i didn't try very hard on it :-$
October 26, 200619 yr The last one is the best out of them all. #1: Brushing is just.. there. Never a fan of grunge brushing because it's so flat, has no depth and no point of view or focus in it. #2: Bit better, but the colors don't really work well IMO. Like the others, too, it's flat. #3: Man, do you always use those dots? O_O. Again, same crit as the first two, flat and flat again. Don't relly on the character to be a focus point. #4: This is a large improvement. Not only do the colors do well with it, but it has a good sense of depth in it not seen in the others. Also, the dots actualy fit, unlike the other signatures where it just seems tacked on there. Same thing with the circles, they fit.
October 26, 200619 yr Author but dots are so much fun, but i get what your saying, i'll try to refrain. and what you said about them beaing flat, just wondering how you knew I flattened all my work :mrgreen: JK, but yeah i sort of get what your saying, and i can sort of see how the last one has the most depth, anywho thanks for the cc :thumbsup:
October 26, 200619 yr look i know this is silly how do u put a sig on the bottom of ur post? ( i cant believe it my pc wont let me ) i like the voldemort one Thanks Terly for the best Avatar in TipIt -winks-
October 26, 200619 yr theyre ok. you need to practise using your pattern a LOT more though. text REALLY needs work. voldemort 1 is pretty.... yea... the way uve used the splatter brushes is ugly, and so is the pattern. My photobucket
October 26, 200619 yr Author ty for all the cc, but yeah I thought I alrdy said that the voldemort one was my worst :-s
October 27, 200619 yr This one is sloppy, I just threw it together cause I thought his face looked funny :lol: You're my hero. XD It really has
October 27, 200619 yr You should try different styles of text and blending it, also you need to add depth and something to bring out the renders and attract attention to it instantly when you see the sig. I do like the concept/idea of the sig and how you've placed the renders but you need to put more depth into them and contrast them and use more variation of the colours. I love the render, but you've totally killed the sig by making it all contrasted to the 1 colour, add more depth and please, please please! Get rid of the dots! I think the text is nice too, try blending it. Hehe, the renders funny. Ahh! The dots! Again! Get rid of them, heh, the scanlines in that sig seem suited for it and I think the text you've got is awesome! Try adding depth (again) and blending the render. This is your best in my opinion. The brushes, the vectors, the lighting, it's all there, it's awesome. But...THE DOTS! Ahhh, get rid of them! Overall I think you have some pretty nice sigs and your creativity, style and ideas are good but you need to add depth and blending. Also, add a bit more lighting like on your last sig.
October 27, 200619 yr Author what i've learned so far: less dots :mrgreen: and more depth :thumbsup: thanks for all the cc everyone i think i might update soon :
October 27, 200619 yr what i've learned so far: less dots :mrgreen: and more depth :thumbsup: thanks for all the cc everyone i think i might update soon : Haha! Learn and put that to practice, your next 'series' of sigs should be great. I look forward to seeing them. :thumbsup:
October 27, 200619 yr great job. gl with everything else :P Hate is a strong word<3:need 130k willows for 99 fm, or 3 mil to buy them "sniff"
October 27, 200619 yr Author I think i'm gonna go ahead and update now, but i made these a while ago so...not to much improvement :-$
October 28, 200619 yr I disagree with everyone, let the dots live on. When you look at sig after sig with dots, sure, it gets boring, but you have to look at the sig alone, where the dots look good (to me)
October 28, 200619 yr What is the font you used? It looks sort of like an English Cyrillic. Me doing staff.
Create an account or sign in to comment