The Mysterious Editor

[Ard_Choille]

Has the editor acuall poster in this topic on their actual forum account, not the "The_Editor" one?

 

 

 

... and you think you'll get a straight answer to this question because ... ?

[Errdoth]

 

Has the editor acuall poster in this topic on their actual forum account, not the "The_Editor" one?

 

 

 

... and you think you'll get a straight answer to this question because ... ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I really don't know, but whenever I post, your the first person to respond. Suspicious, I say. And it makes perfect sense that your Guthix Skiller article would be put to throw off suspicion, but it only proved that your writing was "Times Worthy" :-k ... :-k ... :-k

[Nabbagad]

 

 

 

The editor is a very illusive person.

 

 

 

Has anyone come close to uncovering the identity?

 

 

 

Every article gives hints, but nothing clonclusive.

 

 

 

Does anyone else besides Kiara know the true identity?

 

 

 

Is the editor male or female?

 

 

 

Thoughts of journalism come to mind.

 

 

 

Or is our editor a published author.

 

 

 

Really makes you wonder how this secret has been kept for so long.

 

 

 

I wonder how long the great secret can be kept for.

 

 

 

Some interrogation might be required.

 

 

 

Maybe we should bait the editor with some free geepee

 

 

 

Evedently this is all inconclusive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one who has spotted this?

 

 

 

Nope, spotted it with the missing "E" line. \ Hmm, what could that mean?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Ard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe Adamskii made a typo......maybe not :-k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adam left out one E because one of the Editors name starts with 'E'...?

[KingWenlok]

The editor is a very illusive person.

 

 

 

Has anyone come close to uncovering the identity?

 

 

 

Every article gives hints, but nothing clonclusive.

 

 

 

Does anyone else besides Kiara know the true identity?

 

 

 

Is the editor male or female?

 

 

 

Thoughts of journalism come to mind.

 

 

 

Or is our editor a published author.

 

 

 

Really makes you wonder how this secret has been kept for so long.

 

 

 

I wonder how long the great secret can be kept for.

 

 

 

Some interrogation might be required.

 

 

 

Maybe we should bait the editor with some free geepee

 

 

 

Evedently this is all inconclusive.

 

 

 

Oh, I suppose you're right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reading this thread, I think the Editor's identity will be revealed soon.

 

 

 

Like, the Editor could be anyone.

 

 

 

Yes, anyone. :mrgreen:

[Hugh_Mannity]

I really don't know, but whenever I post, your the first person to respond. Suspicious, I say. And it makes perfect sense that your Guthix Skiller article would be put to throw off suspicion, but it only proved that your writing was "Times Worthy" :-k ... :-k ... :-k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Me -- mere coincidence. You and Ard are probably in the same time zone or something.

[Adamskii]

 

The editor is a very illusive person.

 

 

 

Has anyone come close to uncovering the identity?

 

 

 

Every article gives hints, but nothing clonclusive.

 

 

 

Does anyone else besides Kiara know the true identity?

 

 

 

Is the editor male or female?

 

 

 

Thoughts of journalism come to mind.

 

 

 

Or is our editor a published author.

 

 

 

Really makes you wonder how this secret has been kept for so long.

 

 

 

I wonder how long the great secret can be kept for.

 

 

 

Some interrogation might be required.

 

 

 

Maybe we should bait the editor with some free geepee

 

 

 

Evedently this is all inconclusive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one who has spotted this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coincidence I guess....

[Nero]

 

 

The editor is a very illusive person.

 

 

 

Has anyone come close to uncovering the identity?

 

 

 

Every article gives hints, but nothing clonclusive.

 

 

 

Does anyone else besides Kiara know the true identity?

 

 

 

Is the editor male or female?

 

 

 

Thoughts of journalism come to mind.

 

 

 

Or is our editor a published author.

 

 

 

Really makes you wonder how this secret has been kept for so long.

 

 

 

I wonder how long the great secret can be kept for.

 

 

 

Some interrogation might be required.

 

 

 

Maybe we should bait the editor with some free geepee

 

 

 

Evedently this is all inconclusive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one who has spotted this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coincidence I guess....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lol. I have no clue who he/she/they are, so I won't even guess.

[la la la]

After lots of reading and research, I believe I know who the editor is. Flame if you want, but this is what i believe.

 

 

 

I began by looking at patterns in this thread written by "The_Editor":

 

 

 

 

 

 

kirbybeam wrote:

 

 

 

I don't know if this has been posted yet, but that tip it times is against the forum rules:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A healthy life is a balanced life: work or school, sleep, chores, interaction with family and friends, games. If you're not doing some or all of these, then something is out of whack.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not everyone is a virtue theorist. I find it offensive that tip it promotes a "balanced life" over other ethical/religious choices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We only get one shot at life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a very religious statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're confusing "religion", "philosophy" and "spirituality" for one thing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those are not a religious statements. They are not religious dogma, nor are they promoting one religion or sect over others. They are philosophical statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nowhere have I ever suggested that one religion or sect is preferable to another, and I strongly resent your accusation that I'm promoting any sort of religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am most certainly not a virtue theorist -- however it's been my practical experience, over several decades, that a balance between work and play, between feast and famine, between rest and exertion tend to lead to a more satisfactory quality of life. That's neither a religious dogma nor a theory, but practical wisdom born of a lifetime's experience. There is also considerable medical evidence indicating that a balanced life is a healthier one -- now I know a lot of doctors who think they're gods, but that still doesn't make espousal of balance a religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We do only get one shot at our current lives -- that's not religious dogma either, that's basic physics -- time flows in one direction only. There's no "time outs", no "do overs", no rehearsals, -- you get to live from birth to death with no opportunity to go back and relive any portion of your life to undo any mistakes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Had you read the article in toto, you would have read the conclusion where I said:

 

 

 

Quote:

 

 

 

Play RuneScape, have a good time, collect all those fancy skill capes, but don't neglect the real world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am well aware of Tip.It's rules and policies. However, as Editor I have a degree of autonomy beyond that of the forum discussions. There are responsibilities that come with that autonomy and neither I nor my predecessors have abused the position by using it as a bully pulpit. We endeavour to both inform and entertain our readers, not preach, promote, or propagandize. I save my serious rants for my personal journal, which is not linked to these forums in any way whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I also compared this thread to some threads of tip.it writers. These include: Ard Choille, Kiara Kat, Swampjedi, and Duke Freedom. Yes, I think it is Duke Freedom!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, Let me quote Duke Freedom's most recent article. Notice the "--" pattern as well as his general pattern of speech.

 

 

 

Construction & The Price Behaviour of Rares

 

 

 

Duke_Freedom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, itÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s that time again! I hope that the mathematical gibberish and interesting graphs in this article will entertain you once again. The subject this time? Well, in the first part of this article, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll redo some calculations on construction, and IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll take a look at the total highscores experience graph of construction. In the second part, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll be taking a deeper look into the economic behaviour of rares -- and IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll do my best to amaze you with a fascinating graph about it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In retrospect, it seems my first article about the construction money drain was a "bit" too positive about the amount of money drained by construction. However, at the time of writing, I didnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t really have a clue about how many people would continue levelling the skill after the initial popularity of the skill would wear off. That's also why I announced that IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢d take another look into the money drained by the skill after it had been around for a few months. Since the skill is now over 3 months old, it's a good time to take a critical look at it again now. The newness factor of the skill is pretty much gone, so we should be able to get a good impression of how much money the skill will continue to drain out of the economy in the future.

 

 

 

Click here to see the

 

 

 

Graph of Total Contruction Experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not surprisingly, the graph of the total experience of all players on the construction highscores shows to be a root function (= large growth initially, which slowly becomes less with the time) in the first month. It sounds logical that a new skill is very popular during the first few days after it comes out, then loses players' interest quickly. Eventually, we should expect the graph to start looking more like a linear line (as the interest in levelling the skill will become 'constant'), or actually even a bit like an exponential function (as more and more people are starting to play RuneScape).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see in the graph, the total experience of all people on the construction highscores (about 203K people) combined is 23.2 billion now. During the first 10 days of the skill, players gained roughly 1 billion experience per day on average. Three weeks after that, it dropped to 325 million exp per day, and nowadays it is somewhere around 100 million experience per day -- and it seems to stay around that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The previous time I assumed that with every construction exp gained, roughly 8gp was drained out of the economy. After some comments about that in the forum thread of the previous article and a few chats with higher levelled constructors, I decided that 10gp drained per exp gained is probably more accurate. This means that construction has drained a total of approximately 232 billion gp so far, and that it will continue to drain roughly 1 billion gp per day in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While this amount is still significant, it is too small to do anything about the huge money production in RuneScape. Compared to my last estimate of a net 6 to 7 billion gp created per day, the 1 billion gp drain per day does nothing more than slightly slow down the massive creation of money. Thus the effect of construction on the future price development of rares, for which the money creation (= inflation) is the most important factor, is minimal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the most common misconceptions about rares is that they continuously go up in price in a steady and consistent manner. This is simply not true. Every now and then rares experience a small price drop or at least price stagnation. Usually this is the result of extreme price increases in the recent history. In turn, such periods of price stagnation or falling prices are generally followed by a period of rising prices. Eventually the prices rise too high, which results in a stagnating rares market again. And so on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now a logical question would be whether there is any consistency in the way these events happen? Does the period of prosperity always last a certain amount of time, or does it last 1 month one time, and 6 months the next time? In other words, is there a repetitive pattern, or is it all just random?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To answer this question, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ve created a graph that shows the average daily price growth in percentages of all rares, in which each rare is equally important in contribution. To ensure that the graph is a bit more robust and to make the interpretation of the graph easier, I used only monthly data to create it. After all, incidental daily price increases of 20 % (such things have happened on several occasions in history) are not useful when you are looking for patterned behaviour.

 

 

 

Click here to see the

 

 

 

Graph of Average

 

 

 

Growth Rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So there you have it. I think anyone will immediately be surprised by how clearly the pattern is evident in the graph. RuneScapeÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s rares market has the kind of economic behaviour that you read about in (theoretical) Economics textbooks -- in practice, economists are a lot less likely to run into such obvious patterns. And this is not the first time either! If you can still remember from my previous article, I also found out that the rares market seems to follow the (estimated) total amount of gp ingame almost precisely. (Advanced) economics theories and laws seem to be amazingly applicable for something that some people tend to call "just a game".

 

 

 

I have had my say, respond however you like.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally, let me add that Duke Freedom was released from tip.it staff upon breaking the rule of real-world item trading. One way he could stay as almost a complete member of the staff would be to work as the anonymous editor :-w

[Mirror]

After lots of reading and research, I believe I know who the editor is. Flame if you want, but this is what i believe.

 

 

 

I began by looking at patterns in this thread written by "The_Editor":

 

 

 

 

 

 

kirbybeam wrote:

 

 

 

I don't know if this has been posted yet, but that tip it times is against the forum rules:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A healthy life is a balanced life: work or school, sleep, chores, interaction with family and friends, games. If you're not doing some or all of these, then something is out of whack.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not everyone is a virtue theorist. I find it offensive that tip it promotes a "balanced life" over other ethical/religious choices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We only get one shot at life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a very religious statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're confusing "religion", "philosophy" and "spirituality" for one thing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those are not a religious statements. They are not religious dogma, nor are they promoting one religion or sect over others. They are philosophical statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nowhere have I ever suggested that one religion or sect is preferable to another, and I strongly resent your accusation that I'm promoting any sort of religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am most certainly not a virtue theorist -- however it's been my practical experience, over several decades, that a balance between work and play, between feast and famine, between rest and exertion tend to lead to a more satisfactory quality of life. That's neither a religious dogma nor a theory, but practical wisdom born of a lifetime's experience. There is also considerable medical evidence indicating that a balanced life is a healthier one -- now I know a lot of doctors who think they're gods, but that still doesn't make espousal of balance a religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We do only get one shot at our current lives -- that's not religious dogma either, that's basic physics -- time flows in one direction only. There's no "time outs", no "do overs", no rehearsals, -- you get to live from birth to death with no opportunity to go back and relive any portion of your life to undo any mistakes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Had you read the article in toto, you would have read the conclusion where I said:

 

 

 

Quote:

 

 

 

Play RuneScape, have a good time, collect all those fancy skill capes, but don't neglect the real world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am well aware of Tip.It's rules and policies. However, as Editor I have a degree of autonomy beyond that of the forum discussions. There are responsibilities that come with that autonomy and neither I nor my predecessors have abused the position by using it as a bully pulpit. We endeavour to both inform and entertain our readers, not preach, promote, or propagandize. I save my serious rants for my personal journal, which is not linked to these forums in any way whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I also compared this thread to some threads of tip.it writers. These include: Ard Choille, Kiara Kat, Swampjedi, and Duke Freedom. Yes, I think it is Duke Freedom!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, Let me quote Duke Freedom's most recent article. Notice the "--" pattern as well as his general pattern of speech.

 

 

 

Construction & The Price Behaviour of Rares

 

 

 

Duke_Freedom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, itÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s that time again! I hope that the mathematical gibberish and interesting graphs in this article will entertain you once again. The subject this time? Well, in the first part of this article, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll redo some calculations on construction, and IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll take a look at the total highscores experience graph of construction. In the second part, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll be taking a deeper look into the economic behaviour of rares -- and IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ll do my best to amaze you with a fascinating graph about it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In retrospect, it seems my first article about the construction money drain was a "bit" too positive about the amount of money drained by construction. However, at the time of writing, I didnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t really have a clue about how many people would continue levelling the skill after the initial popularity of the skill would wear off. That's also why I announced that IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢d take another look into the money drained by the skill after it had been around for a few months. Since the skill is now over 3 months old, it's a good time to take a critical look at it again now. The newness factor of the skill is pretty much gone, so we should be able to get a good impression of how much money the skill will continue to drain out of the economy in the future.

 

 

 

Click here to see the

 

 

 

Graph of Total Contruction Experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not surprisingly, the graph of the total experience of all players on the construction highscores shows to be a root function (= large growth initially, which slowly becomes less with the time) in the first month. It sounds logical that a new skill is very popular during the first few days after it comes out, then loses players' interest quickly. Eventually, we should expect the graph to start looking more like a linear line (as the interest in levelling the skill will become 'constant'), or actually even a bit like an exponential function (as more and more people are starting to play RuneScape).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see in the graph, the total experience of all people on the construction highscores (about 203K people) combined is 23.2 billion now. During the first 10 days of the skill, players gained roughly 1 billion experience per day on average. Three weeks after that, it dropped to 325 million exp per day, and nowadays it is somewhere around 100 million experience per day -- and it seems to stay around that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The previous time I assumed that with every construction exp gained, roughly 8gp was drained out of the economy. After some comments about that in the forum thread of the previous article and a few chats with higher levelled constructors, I decided that 10gp drained per exp gained is probably more accurate. This means that construction has drained a total of approximately 232 billion gp so far, and that it will continue to drain roughly 1 billion gp per day in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While this amount is still significant, it is too small to do anything about the huge money production in RuneScape. Compared to my last estimate of a net 6 to 7 billion gp created per day, the 1 billion gp drain per day does nothing more than slightly slow down the massive creation of money. Thus the effect of construction on the future price development of rares, for which the money creation (= inflation) is the most important factor, is minimal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the most common misconceptions about rares is that they continuously go up in price in a steady and consistent manner. This is simply not true. Every now and then rares experience a small price drop or at least price stagnation. Usually this is the result of extreme price increases in the recent history. In turn, such periods of price stagnation or falling prices are generally followed by a period of rising prices. Eventually the prices rise too high, which results in a stagnating rares market again. And so on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now a logical question would be whether there is any consistency in the way these events happen? Does the period of prosperity always last a certain amount of time, or does it last 1 month one time, and 6 months the next time? In other words, is there a repetitive pattern, or is it all just random?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To answer this question, IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ve created a graph that shows the average daily price growth in percentages of all rares, in which each rare is equally important in contribution. To ensure that the graph is a bit more robust and to make the interpretation of the graph easier, I used only monthly data to create it. After all, incidental daily price increases of 20 % (such things have happened on several occasions in history) are not useful when you are looking for patterned behaviour.

 

 

 

Click here to see the

 

 

 

Graph of Average

 

 

 

Growth Rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So there you have it. I think anyone will immediately be surprised by how clearly the pattern is evident in the graph. RuneScapeÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s rares market has the kind of economic behaviour that you read about in (theoretical) Economics textbooks -- in practice, economists are a lot less likely to run into such obvious patterns. And this is not the first time either! If you can still remember from my previous article, I also found out that the rares market seems to follow the (estimated) total amount of gp ingame almost precisely. (Advanced) economics theories and laws seem to be amazingly applicable for something that some people tend to call "just a game".

 

 

 

I have had my say, respond however you like.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally, let me add that Duke Freedom was released from tip.it staff upon breaking the rule of real-world item trading. One way he could stay as almost a complete member of the staff would be to work as the anonymous editor :-w

 

 

 

O_o That actually makes sense. :ohnoes:

[jemathonical]

That makes so much sense.

 

 

 

Duke Freedom ey?

 

 

 

Can some one confirm this?

[la la la]

I found another article that sounds just like it was written by Duke:

 

 

 

It will probably come up again as the RuneScape Economy is something that your Editor finds endlessly fascinating (your Editor, in case you hadn't noticed, is a genuine Nerd!).

 

 

 

Read the rest of the article: http://www.tip.it/runescape/index.php?times=52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, I am beginning to either doubt myself. He speaks of taking place in a good amount of runescape labor months after being banned. Either I am on the wrong trail, or duke has created a new account, something I doubt.

[D. V. Devnull]

Hmm, would be funny if my thought of who The Editor is was wrong... :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

[Hugh_Mannity]

Hmm, would be funny if my thought of who The Editor is was wrong... :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So when are you going to tell us who you think it is and why you think so?

[Mirror]

I found another article that sounds just like it was written by Duke:

 

 

 

It will probably come up again as the RuneScape Economy is something that your Editor finds endlessly fascinating (your Editor, in case you hadn't noticed, is a genuine Nerd!).

 

 

 

Read the rest of the article: http://www.tip.it/runescape/index.php?times=52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, I am beginning to either doubt myself. He speaks of taking place in a good amount of runescape labor months after being banned. Either I am on the wrong trail, or duke has created a new account, something I doubt.

 

 

 

He has created a new account but does not use it that often and I believe he has yet to level it. :lol:

[la la la]

Yes... reekedofmud

 

 

 

I think it's just time for someone to come out and way who it is :wall:

[D. V. Devnull]

Yes... reekedofmud

 

 

 

I think it's just time for someone to come out and way who it is :wall:

 

 

 

I think you mean "say", not "way"... :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

[Saskia Snow]

This is still funny, D. V. when will you say who you think it is?

[Hugh_Mannity]

This is still funny, D. V. when will you say who you think it is?

 

 

 

He won't because he doesn't know any more than any of the rest of us.

[D. V. Devnull]

 

This is still funny, D. V. when will you say who you think it is?

 

 

 

He won't because he doesn't know any more than any of the rest of us.

 

 

 

Or if I do really know, and I do spit out who I think it is, I'll have 15 Tip.It Admins all breathing down my throat with one thought on their minds... "blood" ...Get the [long bleep] point?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Edit]

[Satenza]

I'm willing to bet anyone my entire life it isn't Duke.

[D. V. Devnull]

I'm willing to bet anyone my entire life it isn't Duke.

 

 

 

That could be a risky bet, you know. :( ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

[Satenza]

There's no risk involved. Except the risk of death.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Which i will face if I am wrong. Hmm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Duke's the editor!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*runs*

[Saskia Snow]

 

 

This is still funny, D. V. when will you say who you think it is?

 

 

 

He won't because he doesn't know any more than any of the rest of us.

 

 

 

Or if I do really know, and I do spit out who I think it is, I'll have 15 Tip.It Admins all breathing down my throat with one thought on their minds... "blood" ...Get the [long bleep] point?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Edit]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How is it adult nature? it's a cherub (angel type thing) I haven't had any complaints so far :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ON TOPIC: a guess is a guess, alot of people have had guesses, you are prolly wrong anyway hehe

[D. V. Devnull]

Off-Topic:

 

 

 

 

[Edit]

 

 

 

How is it adult nature? it's a cherub (angel type thing) I haven't had any complaints so far :D

 

 

 

Think "bare-bodied female with wings", and you will get what I mean, Saskia... :| ... (Sorry. :( ... I'm one of those males with a mind that finds the most awkward things in the most innocent intentions.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-Topic:

 

 

 

There's no risk involved. Except the risk of death.

 

 

 

Which i will face if I am wrong. Hmm.

 

 

 

Duke's the editor!

 

 

 

*runs*

 

 

 

(I've dropped a few line feeds on the quote, just to avoid stretching so much.)

 

 

 

Do you get my point now, Satenza? Might NOT want to bet your life on it. :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

[jemathonical]

 

 

This is still funny, D. V. when will you say who you think it is?

 

 

 

He won't because he doesn't know any more than any of the rest of us.

 

 

 

Or if I do really know, and I do spit out who I think it is, I'll have 15 Tip.It Admins all breathing down my throat with one thought on their minds... "blood" ...Get the [long bleep] point?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Edit]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think its cute

 

 

 

Nothing riskay with that...