Ezz

Basketball may be rivaling football (normal) :P Loads and loads of people play it in China, and China is basically 1/3rd of the world's population or so :lol:

Only a few know, and I've actually found a friend who plays RS :) I only tell friends if they ask if I play any online games or whatever. I don't feel the need to tell anyone or anything, neither do I feel the need to not tell them :P

I agree on #1. And about #2, you could just ignore them if they're insulting you, that's pretty much like every other "players are insulting me" rant. Sure I agree people shouldn't be insulting others over a game, but an easy solution is just ignoring them. I appreciate their helping me become better though (without insulting me that is) :P

If you want to be extreme you can pretty much logically say that you can't prove anything at all. It's all a question on how far you're willing to question things :P

Sweden is a very socialist country and it's working totally fine, pretty much no homeless people and still a lot of people with a good amount of wealth. I don't get all the idiots who are saying "boo socialism!", I think they're mixing it up with communism or something.

Not big news to me, I've known this since the day the PvP worlds came out.

I only try to look good if I'm doing something non outfit related, like skilling and such.

Never been to the RSOF before? It's pretty much always like that :P Anyways, these complaints will die down when the hype is down.

Umm, I've never really heard of that particular honour code, so I can't say I know :P

Saw 1 was great, and I hate all the other ones. IMO it would have been perfect if they stopped after the first one.

I don't understand when others complain about "safing". The reason I don't personally eat until 1/2 or 1/3 of my HP bar is because eating loses you like 1.5 turns or so, so I wait until I'm desperate to eat. So yeah, I don't understand why the other player is complaining, the other player is just basically asking you to die.

I agree, and to people saying "Oh but it isn't the real world...", what do you mean? When I play games I'm spending time in the real world, and the games themselves are in the real world too (as electricity making pixels flash across the screen). It should only make sense that stealing virtual items should be punishable, because that is like stealing someone's time into something, just like stealing someone's money off of a bank account (besides, money on a bank account is just pixels isn't it?). I believe there was a TipIt times on this too. I guess you could argue that with a bank account you can buy "real life" things though.

I PK for fun, drops are a bonus :)

I believe in causal determinism (basically what you said, the laws of physics being applied etc.), and have yet to find something that goes against it in logic :P

Yeah, I agree, this MSSW was disappointing. Hopefully the next one might be better.

Yeah, those complaints are getting rather tedious.

Welcome back : As you can see the TipIt forums are getting a little spammy :P

That was truly disappointing... :( But at least the beginning was fun, when we all ran through the Wildy :)

There's no "big reason" behind everything, we just make our own individual reasons for our own existence or lives.

so your theory is that desired items rise in demand fall in supply, causing an increase in price for these items, and your prediction is that people will have more money to spend? this COULD, and i stress could, be possible if items dropped on death were lootable, however these items are taken from the game, leaving degradable items in their place. end result is less wealth overall, higher prices for pking gear, and no impact on the gold supply in the game. i'm not sure that i follow your "items lost, gp worth less, prices would rise, but rares keep prices from rising" train of thought... but my real confusion comes from your inflation theory, sure the price for highly demanded pking goods is going to rise, but this does not constitute inflation. prices will not be effected across the board for general use items, only those used in and relating to pking. Huh? No I mean that the amount of GP in the game will stay the same, while the amount of items will decrease, thus creating an inflation, since there's too much GP for the price of items to stay the same. By logic the items decreasing in supply will of course rise, but if people buy rares, they will rise instead, keeping the items at a steady price, while the overflow of GP goes into the rare market. Hope I made myself clearer this time :P Edit: And yes, I sort of took it for granted that the whole economy revolves around PKing in this one :P

I think Jagex are trying to make it easier for people to be able to buy membership, just recently they released RS support with Wallie cards and the pay cards which you can buy in the US. So it shouldn't be that hard buying a membership.

Yeah, that's quite odd, but it makes me think that there's something more to them.

This is going to be epic in PvP Worlds :thumbsup:

They might, because right now a lot of items are taken out of the game (lost upon death), so there will be an inflation of gp soon, and that usually leads to people buying rares, instead of all other items rising in price. Rares (used to) work as a buffer for inflation.

That's a good question! And I wonder what the players' reaction would be? Would it have been for the better or for the worse? I personally think a lot of players would have complained, partly because it's very different from the wild, and RS players are generally very conservative about changes :P (thinks of all the rants when the look of the zero changed...)