Ezz

What would you choose, a weapon that has +1 attack bonus but hit once per second, or a weapon that has +200 attack bonus but hit once per hour? :mrgreen: Longswords are 1.5x slower (from what I know) than scimitars, sorry to break your bubble.

It depends what you decide to do, that's the special thing with role playing games.

Because all the autoers left after the trading limit updates. The trading limit updates happened 9 months ago, not this month. I'm guessing it's probably because everyone's starting school for real now.

Well, if I remember right they already have this in the Knowledge Base on the main RuneScape site.

Why do you have a main?

I only just started with Xfire a few days ago, and I only have one friend, so anyone feel free to add me, "philzeke" :D I've only played RS with it so far, but I'll be playing some Diablo II and StarCraft too. Oh and I also figured out how to get Xfire to detect SwiftKit as RS :

I prefer cats, but dogs are fine.

Wow, that looks nice, I'll have to try it.

I tried it, looks pretty good, I'll stick to firefox until I hear more about it though.

Yep, it's way too serious. People should play for fun like the game is made to be.

[/hide] You must be crazy, anything harder than the monsters we have now? Untradable? I guess I understand for higher levels but the only thing about this vid I agree with is the raise the skill cap for higher xp. The monsters we have now are so incredibly easy...He isn't saying to get rid of them, just add more. It makes me sad to see level 80's at Bandos... Makes me irritated to see 1 defence pures fighting a boss so easily. -.- No challenge in this game. I 100% agree, something needs to be done.

I remember seeing you on the Rgollum clan chat when hunting for them :P I was at the world 84 Kandarin one. [hide=][/hide] There is a screenshot of it ^ And the player standing by the log with Ahrim's and penguin mask was Mod Emilee :)

Repaired the N and the E, and no big sign of anyone trying to destroy it yet. *hopes they aren't waiting to strike* :roll:

Looks like it's not fully dead after all =D> I'll help reviving it :)

Didn't you just post this on the RSOF? And haven't you read that they're working on the new PvP? :| It'll come out in a few months, be patient...

It's clan wars : And yeah, that looks like a dragon platebody if I ever saw one. Hmm, I wish they wouldn't delete the last banner though, I think they should make the banner change every time you access the site.

How many minutes of mining extra fast did you get from 200 stardust? I got about 6 minutes from 60 stardust, so I'm guessing you got 20 minutes.

Defender of Varrock, because Jagex made a big deal out of it last year when they released that Attack on Varrock wallpaper.

We "lost" to whatever game they're playing, but that doesn't matter, because at least we aren't like them, and we had fun while making the logo too :) Yeah, this thread should stay up for discussion about drawball I guess, and maybe for remaking the tipit logo in some distant future :)

Meh, I guess it's not that big of a deal... :| Was fun while it lasted.

I heard on the RSC official forum (yes, it still exists if you're able access it) that people PK on sundays.

I believe the logo is being destroyed by some organised vandals now, since it's so much at one time. We need all the help we can get to fight them off :?

:lol: I just pronounce Karamja like it says, "Kah-ram(or rum)-jah". It doesn't seem that weird of a name to me. Although one that I find weird is Ardougne. I remember there being a Postbag from the Hedge where Jagex explained how it was pronounced. I remember it being something like "Are-doyne".

I would support lendable rares if they changed the item lending system so that it's less anonymous, like make it between friends only or something. Otherwise no, because I truly hate being asked to lend out my partyhat all the time... I've stopped wearing it :wall: Edit: Sure, people can add each other to be able to lend/borrow, but it would make item lending (not to mention begging to lend something) a lot less common and less anonymous.

Yes, I support it. I don't see what's wrong with it, you kill a fetus that is only a few cells large (don't know how many cells, but that's not significant, since from my understanding it isn't even close to having internal organs or anything yet) and isn't even close to "alive" yet.