Jump to content

Warrager

Members
  • Posts

    1232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Warrager

  1. Here is a link for Tarn's lair: http://www.tip.it/runescape/?page=tarns_lair.htm
  2. It has a very good special ability, but make sure you have extra money for the repair costs. Most people recommend it for training and slayer.
  3. Yes... It's only going to be like 6k...
  4. Wrong forum, posted already: http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=716033
  5. Weren't masks 400k+...? Wierd dip in prices. But the price guage is tied into G.E prices, so yes you were getting ripped.
  6. Yeah, it's only a matter of time... Also, shouldn't go this go into the debate forum? We're debating who is more greedy.
  7. There are 5 times the number of registered F2P accounts then P2P accounts...
  8. Pros: 1. Magic exp. 2. You could go to mining guild, mine 4 coal, 1 mith ore, superheat, repeat. 3. You still make a profit by superheating steel bars+ Cons: 1. Cost 250 gp per cast. 2. It can be tedious.
  9. Well most people anticipate that most to all items will drop somewhat in price. But not so significantly that barrows becomes worthless.
  10. Jagex didn't intend for pures to have the same playing privilages as impures... I really hate the idea that Jagex wants to force players into playing a certain way just because that is the way they have "Envisioned" it. People get bored of mains and skilling, like I did. I never said that you had to be a 'main'. I just said they're different capabilites of being a skiller(you can't tele, etc), or a pure(not good for monster hunting, etc).
  11. Multiple ores =P~ if that happens i would bow to jagex and god :pray: With the Varrock armour from the achievement diaries you can mine two ores at once Yes but that has a small chance of happening. Also the diaries can be hard for some to complete.
  12. Jagex didn't intend for pures to have the same playing privilages as impures...
  13. Um, if they quit Runescape it wouldn't matter. Posting on a forum that also hosts off topic disscusion, a gallery deticated to sig makers, etc, still shows they quit Runescape. For the most part(they may be still playing).
  14. Anyways, I'm pretty sure there will be some upheavels in herblore and possible other skills.
  15. I prefer the Jagex idea. If combat lvl was also included in a factor, bots might have a slim chance of coming back. Also it would be unfair to lower lvls and skillers... Right now its unfair to quest haters (ME) and everyone by resticting our abilites to interact. Its unfair to noobs not to let them us whips, then with the same logic. If you are more powerful, more involved you should get more accesses. Generally idiots use the term 'noob' to describe people. It doesn't make you look good. Anyways, I don't really care about your suggestion as Jagex will probably never take it up. :
  16. I prefer the Jagex idea. If combat lvl was also included in a factor, bots might have a slim chance of coming back. Also it would be unfair to lower lvls and skillers...
  17. Dear God... No, those are not the same thing as PK'ing. PK stand for Player killing. You kill other players in the mini-games. I see no real difference in it, other then you do not get items from the people you killed. Correct me if I'm wrong. That is precisely the point. 1. Bounty hunter is full of 1 itemers, there's one huge team, it's all multi combat, and there's the wretched 180 second pick up penalty. 2. You could do all of the other things you mentioned before the update. NOBODY considers that real Pking...
  18. You don't have to be real smart to play Runescape..
  19. Hm, well since there is a 5% variation of price on G.E, more people will sell/buy on G.E then bother to find a buyer/seller on a forum or ingame...
  20. Ive never brought this on myself, Ive never bought any Autoed goods, Ive never bought RL cash. I used to be a player mod and I would report anyone that I knew to be autoing, in some cases mute them if it was clear. I would think a former moderator would have a better suggestion to cut of all trading abilities of players less then 100 combat level.
  21. =D> You just explained how seriousily flawed your suggestion is and how bots could EASILY counter it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.