Nadril

I copied over a rogue, mage, warrior and druid to PTR. Now just waiting for them to actually , you know, get there. :lol: Depending on how much damn time I have left on PTR once I get copied over I might make a rogue PTR dueling/PvP video...

Its giving me an error right now for copying over a premade, looks like others are having problems too.

Super volcanoes do exist. There is one in Yellowstone, for example.

The spawning glen in zangermarsh IMO.

Its been in here for a month, I never noticed a difference.

I dunno. I wouldn't really base your opinion on the class on your first few games in wsg. Play what you find to be fun and you will learn to make it work in whatever battleground you play. A low level battleground is not the place to decide what you want to play, IMO. Even though gear matching has been introduced, twinks still make the game frustrating. And quitting a class because you have poor gear doesn't make sense either. Hang in there - you'll get better gear. If you have Burning Crusade, to heck what gear you have 1-60. Once you hit outland, everything is replaced (except in the rare cases of those who raided heavily pre-BC). Don't decide on class AND race based on what other people say. Even though a lot of people hate blood elves, I find the race to be the most visually appealing and have the most interesting lore. Their zones rock, their capital city is the best, they look great in cloth (only classes I play), etc. I'm having trouble sticking with my current 70 lock because it is human.. in comparison to BE, they are terrible. Anyways, what I mean is this: you decide what you want to play. And don't make the decision based on gear. That is replaced very quickly. Agreed here. Classes also scale at different rates, just play what you enjoy.

This just in but the term "emo" is a stereotype.

I'm looking forward to possibly raiding kara while on vicoden after I get mine out. :lol:

Play a clothie or plate class. Dont go with the same class. I suggest a tauren warrior. If he's going by getting HK's playing a warrior at lower levels isn't going to be his best bet really.

Your reality post was mostly just rambling and doesn't really have anything to do with what I said. The message I am trying to get across is that I have not seen something that couldn't be rationally explained using logic. Here's a challenge. Find me a photo of paranormal activity, or something about it, and lets see if any of us can or can not debunk it. Chances are it has a rational conclusion behind it.

No, YOU silly. As Nad has already said, the burden of proof lies with you to come with an explanation for whatever. Nad is not someone who the burden of proof rests with, or me, or Zonorch or anybody else who isn't making the claim of paranormal activity. When there is no concrete proof of something you should assume a position of skepticism leaning towards a potential rational explanation, to think otherwise and demand an absolute proof for this rational explanation and assume the paranormal without this absolute proof is as you put it so nicely, silly. [/hide] :roll: Alright. Let me make it simple for you. Something happens. Let's say lights in the sky. Some people say it's aliens. Other people say it's just lights coming from emengency cars. Whoever is able to prove their point wins. My drink accidentally spills. Someone could say that it was a ghost, however I can say that I just held it wrong, tripped a bit and got off balance and lost grip of it. Which one is more realistic? I admit that it isn't a very good example but I hope you get my point. We have to follow with logical examples first. If they don't match up is when we should look for other, less logical, theories.

And thats my que! Of course that happens. Capitalists can put whatever they want on the news, it doesn;t even have to be about anything. In what you call Communism (Stalinism, really, not Communism) only the stuff that people need to know is on the news. Otherwise it would just be wasting resources, not a good thing. Even though the people wouldn;t get all the details, we still wouldn;t ogle at the fact that Angelina Jolie took a crap. And its also much easier to keep what the people want to hear tucked behind tight lips. Remember, there is a different between what the people want and the government wants. Anyways the media is mostly in it for the money. A good story will rake in a lot more cash. On the flip side you can't have TOP STORY all the time, there has to be filler stuff.

I love 3.1 :P. It was the first "OS" I ever used aside from DOS as a kid. I usually ended up using DOS. Anyways I agree with rick here man, get some good 'ole dos games and have a blast. :thumbsup:

What exactly is it doing? Is it not loading a page at all? How are you posting on these forums, a second PC or do they work? Sorry but your question was really ambiguous, I'm not sure where to start until we get more details.

Never liked rapcore, the two genres just don't mix for me. I think I remember listening to older Eminem stuff back in the day before I got into metal. I'll check out the other suggestion too as well, thanks.

I can't believe I'm the first to ask but, well, what are you trying to unlock? :lol: :uhh:

No. No. No. No. There, knock yourself out. And jesus learn to use the search engine.

Just to stir this up a bit but what artist/songs would you recommend to someone who's never really had an interest in rap before? I'm a huge metalhead. I guess you could say I'm not really looking for some guys talking about how big of a pimp they are or how much they get from their girl. More of something that kind of just makes the (good) rap what it is. To be honest I've never given the genre a shot so I'm curious.

Are you saying that the reason the PS2 sold more than the xbox was because of the PS2 was out longer? you're saying that the xbox would of sold more if it was out before and had a previous gen console? He is saying the reason it sold more is it had a reputation behind it. The playstation was largely popular. People had no idea what the Xbox was all about when it came out.

Sup rocket. Too bad I'm lazy or I'd try and go meet you wherever you're at man. (I'm in alexandria, virginia as well). :thumbsup:

Sorry but this isn't a court of law, and we aren't proving anyone guilty of innocent here. The burden of proof is always on the person trying to make a claim. Do, tell me, how I could disprove the idea of ghosts completely? Yes I could disprove certain images but how do you disprove something which most likely is not there? Put another way, lets look at it like this. If someone runs around saying that they saw this 3 horned unicorn running around would you expect the others to try and prove him wrong? We couldn't, there is nothing to go by. The burden of proof is on him. He can find it again, take a photo. There are many ways that he can (try) to prove something, we have nothing to go on. Think about it. A huge story hits the media, its not going to get covered up. In this day and age when the internet is as large as it is it would only be a matter of time before it got exposed, especially if it was a hard rock proof of what happened. Tell me, how can you prove something so ambiguous in a laboratory? You can't test a blurry picture for samples, and more often then not these 'finds' of ghosts and/or alien spacecraft are nothing more than an object mistook for said paranormal item or is a camera trick. You don't need a laboratory to prove something such as that. It also should be interesting for you to know that there is a 1 million $ challenge. Mercifull has posted it a lot in threads such as these. The gist of it is that if you can come up with concrete proof of paranormal activity than you can make 1 million dollars. So far no one has been able to claim the prize.

Pretty much hit the nail on the head there. Not like I'm going to get into this 'debate' though. Shoving around numbers proves nothing. Have fun trying to continue on your little fanboy crusade here though sycosis, its kinda cute. :XD:

That is horribly stupid logic for a couple of reasons. - As Zonorhc stated, the media would be up in arms immediately if we had concrete evidence about paranormal activity. - You assume we take it baselessly and have never done any research ourself. I myself find the idea of UFO's, the Bermuda triangle, ghosts, ect. very fascinating. However there simply is just no evidence for any of the like. (I'm talking about UFO's in the non-literal sense of course. The kind aliens fly around with. Again the burden of proof is on others who think this is true.

No, I don't. UFO's somewhere or someplace probably do exist but I can bet you they aren't near us.

August 3rd or so.