Lenticular_J

I want some pimping leather or tweed or something. I have a...Hollister coat, though. Got it on sale for twenty bucks, and it's plenty warm. Won't be wearing it for long, though. Small mother [bleep]er.

Exactly. Well, that and it's the Christian Bible. You aren't going to read up on geometry for your calculus class, are ya? Well, you might... Biology - physics, maybe.

Well, just saying, all you folks who think life will be wonderful if it gets legalized - think reaaaall hard. Tobacco companies will likely band together and monopolize the industry, and will [cabbage] chemicals on your lovely weed. Just an FYI. Not to mention, that [cabbage] would probably get expensive once they throw something like nicotine in...

I have to go to schoooooooooooool. And my contacts are very bluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurry.

I literally think you should get a mullet, chops, and a handlebar mustache. I wish my facial hair wasn't so wimpy...

Oh God. Some kid at our school has an orange one. I seriously peed a little when I first saw it.

What about a picture? Why say your room is awesome, and not prove it? I'm sure you really wanted to show off your "awesomeness" room you could find a way. I was just saying I literally have no way to get a picture. My phone doesn't have a camera, and I don't have a regular one either. The awesomeness is a side effect. Also: Awesomeness is a word. Firefox r00lz.

I don't know. I hope to never be stuck in this type of dilemma. Why not just build a new train track? Or, even better - cut the damn rope.

Tanks on advanced are [bleep]ing unstoppable. We got one playing an easy run (teehee), and it was down in a few submachine gun rounds. It hit my friend twice, and he lost maybe four health points. Wtf.

I don't. Making such a ridiculous assumption is the same s me assuming all Canadians live in igloos. Of course, that logic is flawed because all Canadians do...

This Oreo I'm holding is neither soggy nor forboding, and smells like chocolate and cream. Am I supposed to keep demanding for a hundred pages, or am I supposed to just call you a moron...? Maybe I should review the most ignorant posts of our centurion-thread. I'm just trying to show you how ridiculously ignorant and simply stupid a question like that is.

If you're going to go to that, I get to demand you answer my question. Maybe I'll throw an e-fit. Maybe I'll tell you to watch a ridiculous video over the Nabisco company, and then answer more ridiculous questions. Once again. Prove you don't enjoy cookies.

Mine would make you implode from awesomeness. I.E., I have no way to convey it to you.

I wasn't asking if you've ever been able to eat them. I demand you provide proof that you don't like them. I believe you've seen the point I'm trying to illustrate. And that is what we are doing by debating. Logical fallacies are used to ensure that we do so in a reasonable and logical manner. Eh, I guess we just have to agree to disagree. I find it illogical to bind your life to the logic of dead men who, in turn, wanted us to explore and find our own logic. Not just decide, "Well, I've looked at theirs, and it's pretty good."

Prove that you don't.

That's the one thing in this world that pisses me off to no end. Some punk in a tuner or other similarly small car decides to ruin their engine so it makes a loud noise. It's like getting a stick shift when you haven't spent your entire life driving with it - it's ridiculous and unnecessary. Not to mention, in many cases it actually means your car is running worse. If I ever own a little car, it'll run quiet and smooth, like the car-God meant.

And where's the atheists with the inconclusive evidence God could never exist and anyone who believes in Him should be flogged? That would be philosophical stagnation. Would Aristotle want you to unquestionably follow his trains of thought? No, he'd encourage you to explore your mind and new ways of doing things. I'd like to ask you a question, then. Do you like cookies?

I guess I just find bringing something like logical fallacies into a debate over God funny. Like trying to bring health studies into a debate over your favorite candy.

I can't find any pictures right now, but I'm a sucker for a sexy Chevy truck or any classic muscle car.

You obviously don't understand the concept of faith in religion. It's different for every single person. I'll use a comparison. A group of people like one person. Perhaps there's someone you like here on the forums? Suppose everyone that likes that person came together. Suppose I don't like them, and I demand that you all have the same exact reason to like them, or you're all morons. Will you all like that person for the same reason? No. Perhaps for similar reasons, but never the same. Religion on an individual scale is as ridiculously varied as morals. To answer your question, yes, I consider myself a Protestant Christian, although my PERSONAL beliefs differ from any one person that considers themselves such. To use an example brought up in the past, the orbiting teacup. Nobody can prove the existence or nonexistence of it, so debating it is silly in itself. But that is also the point of debates. EDIT: Fixed the quotes.

James, I already answered ten relatively ignorant questions. I don't feel like answering ten more that are even worse AND will only be answered by YOU by more questions. Perhaps I don't feel like reciting my personal faith to you? I see the point you're trying to make, but you have to agree it's silly.

Looks similar to Half-Life 1, but I'm pretty sure it isn't.

We're debating God. You bring up logical fallacies...? I really want this post removed, since it's just flamebait and trolling. :/ BUT. I'll take the bait. Question 1: I don't believe God heals anyone more than a placebo, unless there's a literal need for it. Question 2: Because the choices of governments of other people that have major effects in their lives. Question 3: Because the Bible was written by men...? Of course men would put their own discrepancies into their work. Question 4: Oh, all other literature written in the first century was absolutely study material we use today. Question 5: Once again. Men wrote the Bible. They put their own beliefs into it. The Bible contains pitifully few of God's own words, if any. And maybe fewer of Jesus of Nazareth's. Question 6: I don't really think God interferes in our lives, unless they're some sort of special person leading humanity to greatness. Question 7: Could ask the same question of why his first poopy wasn't preserved in gold. His "miracles", which I cannot confirm the existence or non-existence of, were healing people. Since there really weren't the best medical records during His time, it'd be hard to find out if a dead person became healed. Question 8: He's dead. :| Question 9: Access to seeing the universe as He did. Ability to see love and goodness as ably as we notice gravity. See my post covering my beliefs several pages ago. Question 10: We aren't some sort of angels. I mean, Buddha taught that we should be peaceful - yet Japanese Buddhist monks were some of the most feared warriors in the world in the 16th century. That was a pitifully ignorant video. And I don't even have a college degree! :

I'm downloading the demo now. Is there split-screen co-op on the Xbox? Also, does anyone have it and want to play?

That is the greatest thing Texas fans have to put all of their hope in Oklahoma winning. :ohnoes: Well, they could hope for Baylor to... Ohh Lord, I couldn't even complete that sentence in my head.