That mixed DNA is sounding very important right now, isn't it? And yes, I believe that an anti-abortion stance has a very firm basis in ignorance. I don't have the numbers, but I would say that a vast majority of those that oppose it are doing it due to religious convictions. Hardly very convincing evidence. The vast majority of abortion proponents have their basis in deception. In human biological development, there is no such thing as a "fertilized egg". No, immediately after conception the correct scientific term is a Zygote. After it divides once, its considered to be a Blastocyst, after three weeks an Embryo. After the 8th week the person is considered to be a fetus. That entire time period, from fertilization to 8 weeks it can accurately be described as an embryo. "Fertilized egg" connotes images of a chicken egg. Also, in the 1950s, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists changed their definition of pregnancy from the beginning conception (fertilization) to implantation, so they could market "birth control" without having to call it an abortifacient. Further obfuscation is occurring now, where abortion proponents are trying to change the meaning of conception to implantation. If you ever go into Planned Parenthood, they'll incorrectly call a fetus a "ball of cells", or "mass of tissue", sometimes even a "parasite". But, you know, whatever it takes to make people feel better about killing.